Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commissioner of Customs (Exports Promotion) , Mumbai Versus Steel Authority of India Ltd.

2016 (3) TMI 985 - CESTAT MUMBAI

Eligibility for benefit of notification no. 56/2008 dated 29/04/2008 and notification no. 21/2002 - EDI system which is operational into the customs was not updated to extend benefit of notification 56/2008 to the product imported - Respondent sought amendment to bills of entry as per the provisions of section 149 and/or 154 of the Customs Act, 1962 which was not responded to - Held that:- eligible benefit of the notification could not be extended to assessee due to an error and non updation of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

0 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD]. - Decided against the revenue - Appeal No. C/643/09-Mum - A/85891/16/CB - Dated:- 25-1-2016 - M V Ravindran, Member (J) And C J Mathew, Member (T) For the Appellant : Shri K Puggal, Assistant Commissioner (AR) For the Respondent : Shri Bharat Raichandani, Adv ORDER Per M V Ravindran This appeal is filed by the revenue against Order-in-Appeal No.91/2009/MCH /AC /CRS/09-10 dated 13/04/2009. 2. Heard both sides and perused the records. 3. The issue involved in this case is r .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the benefit. The respondent had also requested for amendment under section 149 and/or 154 of the Customs Act, 1962, by a letter dated 08-10-2008, to seek to correct the errors in the EDI bill of entry. Nothing took place from the department side. The refund claim filed by the respondent was rejected by the adjudicating authority by placing reliance of the judgment of Apex Court in the case of Priya Blue Industries Ltd. - 2004 (170) ELT A308 (SC) and Flock (India) Pvt. Ltd. - 2000 (120) ELT 285 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ase of Priya Blue Industries Ltd. & Flock (India) Pvt. Ltd will apply. On the other hand learned counsel submits that the application filed by the appellant for correction in the bills of entry was not considered and there is no doubt that the respondent is eligible for benefit of notification no. 21/2002 and 56/2008, he relied upon the judgment of the tribunal in the case of Oswal Agloimpex Pvt. Ltd. 2012 (283) ELT 300 as also in the case of Cipla Ltd.. 7. We find that there is no dispute a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version