GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (4) TMI 1 - SUPREME COURT

2016 (4) TMI 1 - SUPREME COURT - 2015 (9) SCC 433, 2015 (7) JT 286, 2015 (8) SCALE 737 - Termination of contract awarded and forfeiting the security deposit placed by the contractor for the work to the state and further stating that the work had been put an end to at the cost and risk of the contractor - High Court of Kerala has reversed the decision of the learned Single Judge whereunder he had declined to interfere with the order of the Secretary, Public Works Department, Road and Projects of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

der of termination of contract. The procedure adopted by the High Court, if we permit ourselves to say so, is quite unknown to exercise of powers under Article 226 in a contractual matter.

We can well appreciate a Committee being appointed in a Public Interest Litigation to assist the Court or to find out certain facts. Such an exercise is meant for public good and in public interest. For example, when an issue arises whether in a particular State there are toilets for school childre .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ate Bench should have applied more restraint and proceeded in accordance with law instead of making a roving enquiry. Such a step is impermissible and by no stretch of imagination subserves any public interest. Thus the appeal is allowed and the judgment and order passed by the Appellate Bench is set aside. - CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6086 OF 2015 (@ SLP(C) NO. 19380 OF 2014) - Dated:- 14-8-2015 - MISRA,DIPAK AND PANT,PRAFULLA CHANDRA, JJ). Dipak Misra, J. The present appeal, by special leave, assails th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ate and further stating that the work had been put an end to at the cost and risk of the contractor. 2. Exposition of facts with essential details is imperative to appreciate the controversy in proper perspective and also to consider the manner in which the Appellate Bench has exercised the writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution in respect of a matter relating to termination of contract. The respondent was awarded the work, namely, Stimulus package-improvements to Kannavam-Idumb .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

30.06.2012 and thereafter further extension was granted upto 31.03.2013. 3. As is perceptible from the order of termination of the contract, despite issue of several notices and instructions, the contractor failed to complete the work even during the extended period. The Executive Engineer of the Department issued a memorandum on 14.02.2013 stopping the work. As there was some deviation of work, the revised estimate was required to be done but the same was not sanctioned by the Government. At th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

filed W.P.(C) No. 23087 of 2012. The High Court directed the Principal Secretary, PWD to consider and pass orders on his representation. It is apt to note here that the respondent had filed series of writ petitions, namely, W.P.(C) No. 26075 of 2012 and W.P.(C) No. 5690 of 2013 and the High Court vide order dated 08.04.2013 in W.P.(C) No. 5690 of 2013, directed the Secretary, PWD to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. Eventually, as has been stated earlier, the contract was terminate .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dge directed measurement of the work to be completed effecting necessary entries in the measurement book before finalization of the tender proceedings, if any, in respect of balance work. The learned Single Judge had also directed that the measurements should take place after notice to the contractor. 6. The aforesaid order was assailed in the writ appeal. When the appeal was listed for admission, the Appellate Bench, on 17.12.2013, passed the following order:- We heard the learned counsel for t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ted within the extended period since the Department did not fulfil certain mandatory requirements in order to complete the work and since a stop memo was issued even before the expiration of the extended period. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the appellant is prepared to take out a commission to substantiate the contention that 90% of the work is over. Learned Government pleader sought for a short time to get instructions. Since the matter is urgent and since the courts are .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ted 17.12.2013. Thereafter, the Court passed the following order:- The Commissioners would be free to seek the help of a competent Engineer for the purpose of enabling them to prepare a report which would throw light on the disputed question involved in the case. The appellant as well as respondents would provide all assistance to the Commissioners for execution of their work. The Commissioners would be entitled to call for any record from the appellant as well as respondents 3 and 4 for the pur .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

um amount of work so far up to the commission, inspection date of 3.1.2014 of ₹ 2,27,90,383/- which is 72.24% of the revised estimate and 97.09% of the original work (Estimate PAC). There are some minor damages in the completed portion of BT surface and white topped portion (concrete road) and the general condition of the whole work executed by the contractor is satisfactory. A detailed item wise statement is prepared and appended herewith for perusal as Annexure A. 9. The Appellate Bench .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nd Bridges) to consider and dispose of the matter afresh after affording an opportunity to the contractor of being heard. It also directed that the Commission s report and the Engineer s report and the accounts shall be produced by the contractor before the competent authority who shall take the same into account before taking final decision in the matter. After so directing, the High Court eventually ruled that: Since Exhibit P15 order is passed on incorrect data and since that data was found t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ll pay the said amount of ₹ 5,000/- to the Engineer within 15 days and proof thereof shall be produced by the appellant before this Court. 10. We have heard Mr. Ramesh Babu M.R., learned counsel for the appellants and Mr. K. Parmeshwar, learned counsel for the respondent. 11. The thrust of the matter is whether the Appellate Bench in intra- court appeal arising from a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, should have carried out the exercise that it has done and eventually quashe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

balance work. That direction, as is evident, has been accepted by the State. 12. As the factual narration would reveal, the respondent has been invoking the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution on various occasions challenging every action which pertain to extension of time, denial of revised estimate by the State Government and many other facets of that nature and the High Court, we must say, has been generously passing orders for consideration by the appropriate .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t a Commission of two Advocates and granting them liberty to take assistance of a competent Engineer. As the report would show, the Commission of two Advocates have taken assistance of a retired Assistant Executive Engineer and submitted the report. Though, learned counsel for the State had not objected to the same, yet we really fail to fathom how a writ jurisdiction can be extended to cause a roving enquiry through a Commission and rely on the facts collected without granting opportunity to th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

In State of Bihar v. Jain Plastics and Chemicals Ltd.[ (2002) 1 SCC 216], a two-Judge Bench reiterating the exercise of power under Article 226 of the Constitution in respect of enforcement of contractual obligations has stated:- It is to be reiterated that writ petition under Article 226 is not the proper proceedings for adjudicating such disputes. Under the law, it was open to the respondent to approach the court of competent jurisdiction for appropriate relief for breach of contract. It is se .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eferring to the contentions raised in the affidavits and counter-affidavits, but that would hardly be a ground for exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution in case of alleged breach of contract. Whether the alleged non-supply of road permits by the appellants would justify breach of contract by the respondent would depend upon facts and evidence and is not required to be decided or dealt with in a writ petition. Such seriously disputed questions or rival claim .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

security deposit is without authority of law and without any binding contract between the parties and also contrary to Section 5 of the Contract Act; and (b) whether the writ petition is maintainable in a claim arising out of breach of contract. While dealing with the said issue, this Court opined that:- It is settled law that disputes relating to contracts cannot be agitated under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. It has been so held in the cases of Kerala SEB v. Kurien E. Kalathil[(20 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

owever, are cases where the writ court was enforcing a statutory right or duty. These cases do not lay down that a writ court can interfere in a matter of contract only. Thus on the ground of maintainability the petition should have been dismissed . 15. Having referred to the aforesaid decisions, it is obligatory on our part to refer to two other authorities of this Court where it has been opined that under what circumstances a disputed question of fact can be gone into. In Gunwant Kaur v. Munic .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

etitioner s right to relief questions of fact may fall to be determined. In a petition under Article 226 the High Court has jurisdiction to try issues both of fact and law. Exercise of the jurisdiction is, it is true, discretionary, but the discretion must be exercised on sound judicial principles. When the petition raises questions of fact of a complex nature, which may for their determination require oral evidence to be taken, and on that account the High Court is of the view that the dispute .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

or for analogous reasons. 15. From the averments made in the petition filed by the appellants it is clear that in proof of a large number of allegations the appellants relied upon documentary evidence and the only matter in respect of which conflict of facts may possibly arise related to the due publication of the notification under Section 4 by the Collector. 16. In the present case, in our judgment, the High Court was not justified in dismissing the petition on the ground that it will not dete .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tee Corpn. of India Ltd.[ (2004) 3 SCC 553], a two-Judge Bench after referring to various judgments as well as the pronouncement in Gunwant Kaur (supra) and Century Spg. And Mfg. Co. Ltd. v. Ulhasnagar Municipal Council[(1970) 1 SCC 582], has held thus:- 19. Therefore, it is clear from the above enunciation of law that merely because one of the parties to the litigation raises a dispute in regard to the facts of the case, the court entertaining such petition under Article 226 of the Constitution .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

some disputed questions of fact. xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx 27. From the above discussion of ours, the following legal principles emerge as to the maintainability of a writ petition: (a) In an appropriate case, a writ petition as against a State or an instrumentality of a State arising out of a contractual obligation is maintainable. (b) Merely because some disputed questions of fact arise for consideration, same cannot be a ground to refuse to entertain a writ petition in all cases as a matter of rule. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

stitution. The High Court having regard to the facts of the case, has a discretion to entertain or not to entertain a writ petition. The Court has imposed upon itself certain restrictions in the exercise of this power. (See Whirlpool Corpn. v. Registrar of Trade Marks[(1998) 8 SCC 1].) And this plenary right of the High Court to issue a prerogative writ will not normally be exercised by the Court to the exclusion of other available remedies unless such action of the State or its instrumentality .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he insurance contract which were agreed between the parties were after the terms of the contract between the exporter and the importer were executed which included the addendum, therefore, without hesitation we must proceed on the basis that the first respondent issued the insurance policy knowing very well that there was more than one mode of payment of consideration and it had insured failure of all the modes of payment of consideration. From the correspondence as well as from the terms of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

een the exporter and the importer on the face of it does not give room for a second or another construction than the one already accepted by us. We have also noted that reliance placed on sub-clause (d) of the proviso to the insurance contract by the Appellate Bench is also misplaced which is clear from the language of the said clause itself. Therefore, in our opinion, it does not require any external aid, much less any oral evidence to interpret the above clause. Merely because the first respon .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Marfatia & Sons v. Board of Trustees, Port of Bombay[(1989) 3 SCC 293], Mahabir Auto Stores v. Indian Oil Corp.[ (1990) 3 SCC 752] and Jamshed Hormusji Wadia v. Board of Trustees, Port of Mumbai[(2004) 3 SCC 214] and opined thus:- Although the scope of judicial review or the development of law in this field has been noticed hereinbefore particularly in the light of the decision of this Court in ABL International Ltd. each case, however, must be decided on its own facts. Public interest as no .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed by the High Court in exercise of its power of judicial review and ultimately the appeal was dismissed. 20. We have referred to the aforesaid authorities to highlight under what circumstances in respect of contractual claim or challenge to violation of contract can be entertained by a writ court. It depends upon facts of each case. The issue that had arisen in ABL International (supra) was that an instrumentality of a State was placing a different construction on the clauses of the contract of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version