Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Kotsons Pvt. Ltd. And G.S. Rajput Versus CCE & ST, Jaipur-I

2016 (4) TMI 14 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

CENVAT credit wrongly availed - penalty imposed - Held that:- The appellants have reversed the credit and also deposited the interest. The appellants have not been able to substantiate their act of availing credit as per provisions of law. Therefore the finding of the authorities below that appellant has wrongly availed credit does not call for any interference.

Equal amount of penalty under Rule 15 read with 11AC is imposed upon the appellants besides separate penalty upon the Vice P .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed is totally unjustified. The same are set aside. - Appeal No. E/59446 & 59447/2013-EX(SM) - Final Order No.52718-52719/2015 - Dated:- 1-9-2015 - MS. SULEKHA BEEVI C.S., MEMBER (JUDICIAL) For the Petitioner : Shri Bipin Garg, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri R.K. Gupta, DR ORDER PER: SULEKHA BEEVI C.S. The allegation raised against the appellant is that appellant availed 100% Cenvat credit on capital goods supplied by their sister unit, in the same financial year and also did not take into ac .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Rs.17,17,299/-) in the same financial year in which the said capital goods were received instead of availing 50% credit as provided in Rule 4(2) (a) of Cenvat Credit Rules 2004. Therefore appellants wrongly availed credit of ₹ 17.17,299/-. It was also observed that the supplier unit (viz. Kotsons (P) Ltd. Alwar-Unit-I) had cleared the impugned old and used capital goods on the same value on which the capital goods were received by them, whereas they were required to clear these capital go .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssued which finalized in the order dated 10.1.2012 which disallowed the credit of ₹ 18,59,650/- and confirmed the liability of interest and appropriated the credit reversed and interest deposited. A penalty of equal amount was imposed, besides separate penalty of ₹ 1,50,000/- on Shri G.S. Rajput, Vice President of M/s Kotsons (P) Ltd. The learned Counsel for the appellant referred to Rule 10 of the Cenvat Credit Rules and contended that sub clause (2) of Rule 10 permits utilizing the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d capital goods were cleared to the sister unit. The appellants then availed 100% credit on capital goods in the same financial year. The sister unit while clearing the goods availed credit on the entire duty paid on invoices without taking into account the depreciation. The learned counsel for appellants had made a frail attempt to establish that Rule 10 of CCR would apply in case of shifting of the capital goods to sister unit. Rule 10 does not fall in place with the facts of this case. The ap .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version