Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. NALCO Versus Commr. of Central Excise, BBSR-I

2016 (4) TMI 18 - CESTAT KOLKATA

Denial of CENVAT credit with respect to motor vehicle chassis (Tractor) falling under Chapter 87 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - interest and an equivalent amount of penalty has been imposed under Rule 13 (1) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 - Held that:- From the above definition of capital goods, goods of Chapter 87 are not covered within the definition of capital goods for the purpose of taking CENVAT Credit as capital goods. There is also nothing on record to suggest as to how the said .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

redit is taken has not been used directly in or in relation to the manufacture of the finished goods manufactured by the appellant. Accordingly, the Bench does not find any merit in interfering with denial of CENVAT Credit and interest ordered by the first appellate authority against the appellant. In the case of Gajra Gears Ltd. Vs. CCE (2015 (5) TMI 629 - SUPREME COURT ), Hon'ble Apex Court also made the observations that material handling equipments like hand trolley or fork lift and operatio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ful misstatement etc. Accordingly, penalty imposed upon the appellant is set aside. - Excise Appeal No. 129/2005 - Order No : FO/A/75228/16 - Dated:- 29-3-2016 - SRI H.K. THAKUR, TECHNICAL MEMBER For the Petitioner : None For the Respondent : Sri S.S. Chatterjee, Supdt. (A.R.) ORDER PER SRI H.K. THAKUR This appeal has been filed by the appellant against Order-in-Appeal No.286/BBSR-I/04 dated-15/12/2004 under which Order-in-Original No. AC/CTC-AGL-1/CE/6/2004 Dated-16/02/2004 passed by the adjudi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

request has been received from the appellant. As the matter pertains to the year 2005, therefore, the same cannot be kept pending any further. 3. Shri S.S.Chatterjee, Supdt. (A.R.) appearing on behalf of the Revenue argued that the appellant took CENVAT Credit on motor vehicle chassis (Truck) falling under Chapter 87 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. It was his case that Chapter 87 of the Central Excise Tariff is not covered under Rule 2 (b) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, therefore, ca .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the present appeal is whether CENVAT Credit with respect to motor vehicle chassis (Tractor) falling under Chapter 87 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, is admissible to the appellant under Rule 2 (b) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002. The said rule 2 (b) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 is reproduced below:- (b) capital goods mean, - (i) all goods falling under Chapter 82, Chapter 84, Chapter85, Chapter90, heading No. 68.02 and Sub-heading No. 6801.10 of the First Schedule to the Tariff Act .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version