Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (4) TMI 44 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

2016 (4) TMI 44 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT - TMI - Reopening of assessment - Held that:- The petitioning assessee had to provide for the entire amount due of ₹ 19,20,000/- that accrued to the retired partner irrespective of the amount actually paid upon Accounting Standard-15 coming into effect; but the concerned partner would show only the amount received of ₹ 4,80,000/-. While the figures appear to be mismatched, that is because of the different accounting systems followed by the two as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ng officer from elsewhere which could prompt the same, the notice dated March 31, 2014 issued by the assessing officer and all steps taken pursuant thereto for reassessment of the petitioning assessee’s accounts for the assessment year 2007-08 stand set aside. - WP No. 228 of 2016 - Dated:- 21-3-2016 - Sanjib Banerjee, J. ORDER The Court : The petitioners question the propriety of a notice dated March 31, 2014 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for initiating proceedings for re .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

appropriate authorities within time. Upon such attempt at reassessment being challenged by way of WP No.205 of 2013, this Court restrained any final order being communicated on the reassessment without the leave of Court. The matter is pending after filing of affidavits. As far as the present attempt at reassessment is concerned, it pertains to the pension to an erstwhile partner of the petitioner firm. The petitioners claim that since the petitioners referred to the accounts being prepared on .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

unts for the relevant year. Under Clause 18 in Form No.3CD, the petitioning assessee disclosed the particulars of payments made to the persons specified under Section 40A(2)(b) of the Act. The list of all relevant persons was also disclosed. It was clearly mentioned therein that P. M. Narielvala (since deceased) was an erstwhile partner of the petitioner firm and a sum of ₹ 19,20,000/- was shown to have accrued to the said erstwhile partner on account of pension. The petitioners say that s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he petitioning assessee. On behalf of the department, it is submitted that even if the petitioning assessee followed the mercantile system of accounting on accrual basis, the deduction of the sum of ₹ 19,20,000/- could not have been made from the profit and loss accounts of the company for the relevant year when, during such year, only a sum of ₹ 4,80,000/- had actually been paid to the erstwhile partner and the balance amount had not been paid but was only notionally provided for. I .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version