GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
What's New Case Laws Highlights Articles News Forum Short Notes Statutory TMI SMS More ...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (4) TMI 89 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

2016 (4) TMI 89 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT - TMI - Pre deposit - stay of demand - Held that:- We direct that till 7 April 2016 by which date the petitioner has been directed to deposit 30% of the balance amount, no coercive steps shall be taken by the Department. However, if the petitioner fails to deposit the balance 30% of the disputed tax by 7 April 2016, the protection granted by the Court shall stand automatically withdrawn and it will be open to the Department to pursue the matter in accordanc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e Surya Prakash Kesarwani, JJ. For the Petitioner : Abhinav Mehrotra For the Respondent : S.C. ORDER This petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 11 March 2016 passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Muzaffarnagar on the petition for stay of demand filed by the petitioner. It is stated that for the A.Y. 2012-13 an order was passed on 31 March 2015 determining the income at ₹ 3,20,17,882/- as against the returned income of ₹ 17,07,650/-. This resulted in tax d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d so it would be just if pending the disposal of the First Appeal, the assessee was directed to deposit 50% of the disputed tax. However, as 20% had already been deposited by the assessee, it was directed that assessee should pay the balance 30% of the disputed tax by 22 March 2016. In addition thereto, the assessee was also required to give an undertaking that it will cooperate in the early disposal of the First Appeal and will not seek any adjournment and would also provide by 14 March 2016 th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y reduce the amount required to be deposited by the petitioner but should also issue a direction for early disposal of the First Appeal. Sri Piyush Agarwal, learned counsel appearing for the respondents has, however, submitted that the order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Muzaffarnaga does not suffer from any illegality. He has, however, very fairly stated that Commissioner of Income Tax (A) shall make all endeavours to decide the First Appeal at an early date. We have consi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Advanced Search


Latest Notifications:

    Dated      Category

20-7-2017 Cus (NT)

20-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

19-7-2017 IT

19-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 CE (NT)

18-7-2017 CE

18-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

15-7-2017 Kerala SGST

14-7-2017 Andhra Pradesh SGST

14-7-2017 Cus (NT)

14-7-2017 Cus

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 ADD

13-7-2017 ADD

12-7-2017 Jammu & Kashmir SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 CGST Rate

More Notifications


Latest Circulars:

21-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

20-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

20-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

19-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

19-7-2017 Income Tax

18-7-2017 Customs

17-7-2017 Customs

14-7-2017 Income Tax

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

More Circulars



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version