Contact us   Feedback   Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (4) TMI 95 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

2016 (4) TMI 95 - MADRAS HIGH COURT - TMI - Refund claim of amount collected towards compounding fee - Detain of mix gold ornaments and released on collecting compounding fee - Proper due process of law not followed - Second respondent neither issued any notice nor passed any compounding order before collecting the compounding fee of ₹ 3,05,802/- from the petitioner for release of the goods - Held that:- in view of the ground raised by petitioner that it would suffice, if a copy of the not .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sion before the authority concerned. On filing of such revision, the authority concerned shall entertain the same without raising any issue relating to limitation and thereafter consider and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, after affording due opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner. Since the place of business of the petitioner is at Gujarat, representation shall be made by the counsel on record for the petitioner, on which basis, the copy of the compoundi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, as per release order dated 01.10.2014. 2. According to the petitioner, the petitioner is a registered dealer under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act. In the course of their business, the petitioner sent mixed gold ornaments under approval voucher/Bill ref. No.1 dated 29.09.2014 to their representative through courier viz., M/s. Blue Dart Aviation. As no buyer was available for the same, the representative returned the entire goods on 30.09.2014, without effecting any sale in the State of Tamil N .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ner is before this Court. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the goods in question were transported accompanying the valid documents, which clearly show that the same were sent for approval and on final selection of the same, sale bill would be raised. However, without properly verifying the same and without any authority, the second respondent detained the same and issued the goods detention notice dated 30.09.2014. Further, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version