Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2016 (4) TMI 113

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nasmuch as there is no provision in the balance sheet showing any payment of service tax on the basis of different categories or invoicewise etc. Similarly, the observations made by the adjudicating authority in respect of ST 3 return and TR 6 invoices not being co-related is vague observations without any further details as to how the two documents are not in consonance with each other. Ignoring the documentary evidence regarding services provided by CIRT, Pune and paid the service tax by same and making general observations in a legal matter cannot be appreciated. Therefore, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded back. Demand of Service tax of around ₹ 3 crores - Business Auxiliary Service - Services provided .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ociation of State Road Transport Undertaking (hereinafter referred to as ASRTU), they have their another division and known as Central Institute of Road Transport (CIRT) at Pune. Both the units are engaged in providing various services to its registered members. Proceedings were initiated against the appellant by way of issuing two show cause notices, which raised the demand of Service tax in respect of various services being provided by them and falling under different heads. The proceedings in the show cause notice culminated into impugned orders passed by the Commissioner confirming the demand of service tax to the tune of ₹ 9.66 crores. It is seen that during the adjudication before the Commissioner,the appellant took a categorica .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n sheet submitted by the noticee along with their reply dated 18.6.2012 is totally vague, incomplete and misleading in the said reconciliation sheet the noticee has inconspicuously claimed exemption from payment of service tax on account of export of services, but the assessee has not submitted any proof, whatsoever, in this regard in support of their claim regarding export of services. During the course of personal hearing held on 21.10.2013, the assessee had produced a letter dated 15.10.2013 issued by State Bank of India, Pune stating that the requisite report /verification in respect of deposit of Service Tax by CIRT Pune would be given in 10-15 days time, but I find that no such report has been produced by the noticee. I find that even .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the main ground that invoices produced by the assessee did not tally with the service tax paid by Pune, in the common balance sheet for the two. It also stand recorded by the adjudicating authority that in respect of ST 3 return and TR 6 challan, produced before him, there is no co-relation between two. We find the above observation of the Commissioner did not reflect upon the correct factual position. We fail to understand as to how the challans produced by the appellant would get reflected in the common balance sheet inasmuch as there is no provision in the balance sheet showing any payment of service tax on the basis of different categories or invoicewise etc. Similarly, the observations made by the adjudicating authority in respect o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... spute that no fee is charged by the appellant from the member transport. If that be the case, we prima facie agree with the learned advocate that said activity may not get covered under the category of Business Auxiliary service . We have not gone into the details of said legal issue and inasmuch as the matter is being remanded to the adjudicating authority, we leave open it for the adjudicating authority to re-decide the issue on merits. 7. We also find that small amount of tax to the extent of ₹ 12 lakh stand confirmed against the appellant under the category of club and association activity. The said issue is now decided by various High courts. Reference may be made to judgment of Hon ble High Court of Jharkhand in Ranchi Club .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates