Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2016 (4) TMI 149

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... filed by the appellant, for the early hearing of the appeals, is cryptic in nature, it cannot be said that the appellants could be really aggrieved by the said order. In such circumstances, we find that there is no merit in the present appeals filed by the appellants. Hence, the appeals stand dismissed. - C.M.A. Nos. 35 and 36 of 2016 - - - Dated:- 21-1-2016 - M. Jaichandren And S. Vimala , J .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... anufacturers of automobile components. The appellant had filed an appeal before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, against the Order in Original Nos.11 12 of 2014, dated 28.5.2014, passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai, confirming the demand of differential duties of central excise said to be payable by the appellant, along with the interes .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... said to be due from the appellant during the pendency of the appeal. However, it had dismissed the applications for the early hearing of the appeals stating that they had no merits. 4. In such circumstances, the appellant had filed the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeals before this Court raising the following substantial questions of law. A. Whether the Tribunal is justified in rejecting .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ax Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1982. As such, the Tribunal ought to have passed a detailed order giving reasons, while dismissing the said applications. 6. The learned counsel appearing for the appellants had further submitted that the Tribunal had failed to take into consideration the instructions contained in CESTAT F.No.974/PR (CEGAT)/86, dated 21.2.1986, wherein, the circumstances .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... een aggrieved by the common order passed by the Tribunal dismissing the early hearing applications filed by the appellant. Even though the order passed by the Tribunal dismissing the applications filed by the appellant, for the early hearing of the appeals, is cryptic in nature, it cannot be said that the appellants could be really aggrieved by the said order. In such circumstances, we find that t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates