GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (4) TMI 193 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

2016 (4) TMI 193 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT - 2016 (331) E.L.T. 73 (Cal.) - Provisional assessment in terms of Rule 7 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Held that:- Since Rule 7 gives right to the assessee to apply for provisional assessment and for payment of duty on provisional basis, the learned Single Judge was justified in allowing the writ petition in passing order in terms of prayer (a) of the writ petition. Therefore, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submission adv .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of hearing, the parties are at liberty to rely on judgments and orders in support of their contentions and the Deputy Commissioner in his reasoned order shall deal with the same. - APO No. 337 of 2015, W.P. No. 299 of 2015 and G.A. No. 2665 of 2015 - Dated:- 9-9-2015 - Soumitra Pal and Mir Dara Sheko, JJ. Shri P.K. Roy, K.K. Maiti, Dr. Samir Chakraborty and Sanjay Bhowmick, Advocates, for Appearing Parties. ORDER The Court : Since necessary documents and orders are annexed to the applicatio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

-I & Ors.] [2015 (323) E.L.T. 508 (Cal.)], whereby the learned Single Judge had allowed the writ petition in terms of prayer (a) thereof. Prayer (a) of the writ petition is as under : A writ of and/or order and/or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondents and each of them, their servants and/or agents to allow clearance of excisable goods manufactured/to be manufactured by the petitioners under provisional assessment in terms of Rule 7 of the said Rules and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ustoms, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, will be jeopardized. 4. Dr. Chakraborty submits that since the applications for provisional assessment under the said Rule were kept pending and were not informed about filing of any stay application in the appeal filed before CESTAT, the respondents were compelled to file writ petition to allow clearance of goods on provisional assessment and for payment of duty on provisional basis under Rule 7 of the Rules. Submission is that since adequ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version