New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (4) TMI 195 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT

2016 (4) TMI 195 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT - 2016 (332) E.L.T. 47 (Chhattisgarh) - Failure to deposit the penalty amount as ordered under Section 35F - Held that:- The Appellant does not appear to have brought to the attention of the authorities at earlier stage the dropping of the proceedings against the original assessee on 16.12.2013. The fact was mentioned for the first time in the Miscellaneous Application. The earlier interim order of the Tribunal dated 3.9.2014 directing deposit of entire .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

reasons. It has repeatedly been held that reasons are part of the principles of natural justice which apply with equal force to Courts and Tribunals. It is trite law that justice must not only be done but it must appear to be done. A litigant approaching the Court with a perceived grievance according to his understanding has a right to be told why his perception was not correct. He cannot be confronted with the conclusions without telling him the reasons. Modification application restored to fi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nal Order dated 5.5.2015 dismissing the substantive Appeal No. E/52889/2014 for failure to deposit the penalty amount of ₹ 27,000/- as ordered under Section 35F of the Act on 3.9.2014. 3. Learned Counsel for the Appellant submitted that a search was carried out at the premises of M/s. Shubh Labh Ispat Private Limited, Raipur. On basis of the papers seized and statements recorded, on a prima facie opinion for clandestine removal of 97.160 MT MS Ingot during the period of April 2005 to Decem .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n noticee M/s. Shubh Labh Ispat Private Limited, Raipur had itself been dropped on 16.12.2013 in Appeal No. 406-409/RPR-I/2013. Aggrieved, the Appellant carried the matter in appeal to the Tribunal under Section 35B of the Act which ordered deposit of entire penalty of ₹ 27,000/- on 3.9.2014 without again appreciating that the demand against original assessee itself had been dropped. 4. The Appellant, in the circumstances filed a miscellaneous application before the Tribunal on 10.10.2014 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

igilant for protection of its own interests as no body appeared on its behalf on 5.5.2015. The Court may not test the order of the authority including the Tribunal on grounds not urged before them. Even the final order of the Tribunal cannot be said to suffer any deficiency if a party does not appear and plead its case properly. 6. We have considered the submissions on behalf of the parties and are in partial agreement with the submissions on behalf of the Respondent. The Appellant does not appe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version