Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Versus M/s CMS Securitas Ltd.

2016 (4) TMI 207 - ITAT MUMBAI

Deduction of bad debts disallowed - Held that:- The claim on account of bad debts written off is now settled on the basis of judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of T.R.F Ltd. v. CIT [2010 (2) TMI 211 - SUPREME COURT]. There is no dispute on facts that bad debts have been written off. Thus, as per law, the assessee is undisputedly eligible for the claim. The only hurdle created by the AO was that since the claim was not made in the return of income, therefore, the claim could not ha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e course of assessment proceedings if he is able to show that the return filed was not in accordance with the law or if some income was wrongly offered to tax, which was as per law, not liable to tax, or if the assessee finds that there was omission to make a claim in the return of income. The only precaution to be taken here would be that fresh claim of the assessee should be strictly within the four corners of law. If it is so, the claim made even for the first time during the assessment proce .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

1961 (5) TMI 54 - SUPREME COURT ), held that the state authorities should not raise technical pleas if the citizens have a lawful right, which is being denied to them merely on technical grounds. The state authorities cannot adopt the attitude which private litigants might adopt. - Decided in favour of assessee. - ITA No. 4474/MUM/2013 - Dated:- 26-2-2016 - Saktijit Dey, JM And Ashwani Taneja, AM For the Appellant : Shri S R Kirtney (DR) For the Respondent : Shri Basant K Jain ORDER Per Ashwani .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of bad debt of ₹ 96,35,224/- made in the return of income when assessee had failed to claim such deduction by filing revised return of income u/s. 139 of the Income Tax Act. 2. The Appellant craves to leave to add, to amend and/or to alter any of the grounds of appeal, if need be. 3. The appellant, therefore, prays that on the grounds stated above, the order of the CIT(A)-39, Mumbai may be set aside and that of the Assessing Officer restored." 2. During the course of the hearing, it w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he order of the Assessing Officer (in short 'the AO'). 3. We have gone through the orders of the lower authorities as well as order of the Tribunal for A.Y 2008-09. The solitary issue involved in the Revenue's appeal is that in the return of income the assessee had made claim on account of bad debts written off for ₹ 96,35,224/-. During the course of assessment it was found by the assessee that the assessee had by mistake claimed lesser amount on account of bad debts, and there .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t the aforesaid judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court was not applicable on the appellate authority. The CIT(A) also relied upon the circular issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes no. 14 dt. 11.4.1955, wherein it was guided by the Board to the revenue officers of the Income Tax Department that they must not take advantage of the ignorance of the assessee and that it was one of the duties of the officers to assist the tax payers in determination of correct amount of tax payable, as per .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he course of the assessment proceeding with respect to additional claim on account of bad debts. The AO in that year had had rejected the claim in an identical manner by relying upon the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Goetze (India) Ltd. v. CIT (supra) as has been done in this year. The said claim was allowed by the ld. CIT(A) and Department carried the matter in appeal before the Tribunal. 5. The Tribunal in A.Y 2008-09 considered the entire gamut of facts and the pos .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ee stated before ld. CIT(A) that actual debts written off in the financial year relevant to the assessment year under consideration is ₹ 1,87,70,011/ and there is a mistake in the return of income. Ld. CIT(A) considered the submissions of the assessee and held that even if the claim is not made in the return of income and it is made before the first appellant authority, the claim can be entertained. The First Appellate Authority referred the decision of the Third Member of Delhi Bench of t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

re deciding the merits of the claim. In Goetze (India) Ltd. v. CIT (2006) 204 CTR (SC) 182 : (2006) 284 ITR 323 (SC), the Supreme Court held that the assessee can make a claim for deduction, which has not been claimed in the return, only by filing a revised return within the time allowed. In the same decision, it was made clear that the power of the Tribunal to admit an additional ground under s. 254 is not affected by its decision. It was however clarified that the case was concerned with only .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

not in his return but in the course of the assessment proceedings and the ITO failed to consider the same, it was open to the AAC to entertain the claim. In CIT v. Kanpur Coal Syndicate (1964) 53 ITR 225 (SC), it was held by the Supreme Court that the powers of the CIT(A) of income and it was merely enlarged to 40 per cent on the footing that the assessee was running the trucks on hire. It cannot be said to be an entirely new claim made for the first time in the letter filed by the assessee in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

igher depreciation on merits." 4. Ld CIT(A) has stated that the facts in the case before him are similar to the above mentioned decision and accordingly allowed the claim of ₹ 1,87,70,011/- as bad debts amount actually written off by the assessee. Hence department is in appeal before the Tribunal. 5. During the course of hearing ld.DR relied on the order of the AO and whereas ld.AR relied on the order of ld. CIT(A). He further submitted that the assessee actually written of amount of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f as irrecoverable in accounts of assessee to satisfy the condition of Section 36(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961". In view of the above amendment w.e.f. 1-4-1989 the assessee is entitled to claim deduction as it would satisfy the purpose of the Act. In view of above, in the facts of case, we uphold the order of ld. CIT(A) and reject ground of appeal taken by the department. Hence, appeal of the department is dismissed." 6. We have gone through the aforesaid judgment of the Tribuna .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

been allowed to the assessee. We do not respectfully agree with the views of the AO. In our considered view, if the assessee is entitled for a deduction, as per law and facts, same should not have been denied to itr merely because the claim was not made in the return of income. That would, in our considered opinion, amount to collecting taxes without authority of law. It is further noted by us that it is well settled position of law that assessee can resile from its return of income during the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ings should not be rejected. 7. In our view, there are no estoppels on legal issues under the income tax law. Even if, assessee agrees or consents for something contrary to law, the A.O. is obliged under the law, to discharge his duty of making fair assessment of income and to compute amount of tax payable as per law. As per Article 265 of the Constitution of India, "No tax can be collected except by authority of law". Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ramlal vs Rewa Coalfield L .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f had included that dividend income in its return for the year in question, but there was no estoppel in the Income-tax Act and the assessee having itself challenged the validity of taxing the dividend during the year of assessment in question, it must be taken that it had resiled from the position which it had wrongly taken while filing the return. Quite apart from it, it was incumbent on the income-tax department to find out whether a particular income was assessable in the particular year or .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

other judgment of Hon'ble Gujarat High Court, in the case of, S.R. Koshti 276 ITR 165 (Guj) in which relief was granted to assessee with following observations: "The authorities under the Act are under an obligation to act in accordance with law. Tax can be collected only as provided under the Act. If an assessee, under a mistake, misconception or on not being properly instructed, is over-assessed, the authorities under the Act are required to assist him and ensure that only legitimate .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ollection of tax if the same is without authority of law." 10. Lastly, we find it useful to refer to judgment of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of Central Provinces Manganese Ore 112 ITR 734, holding that, the mere fact that a deduction was not claimed before the Income-tax Officer, was not of much importance, since if the liability arises then a claim can be made in a bonafide manner at any stage before the higher authority, who is competent to grant relief. 11. As far as the ju .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eld that the Tribunal has powers to allow fresh claim made by the assessee during the course of assessment proceedings. The relevant observations of Hon'ble High Court are reproduced below :- "12. As clear from the abovesaid facts, there is no dispute that customer introduction charges did not (sic) represent revenue expenditure. The principal ground taken by the Revenue in this appeal is that if no claim for deduction of the amount was made in the return of income then deduction would .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

taxing authorities is to assess correctly the tax liability of an assessee in accordance with law. We do not see any reason to restrict the power of the Tribunal under s. 254 only to decide the grounds which arise from the order of the CIT(A). Both the assessee as well as the Department have a right to file an appeal/cross-objection before the Tribunal. We fail to see why the Tribunal should be prevented from considering questions of law arising in assessment proceedings although not raised ear .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ng the question before it subject to the restrictions or limitations, if any, prescribed by the statutory provisions. in the absence of any statutory provision, the appellate authority is vested with all the plenary powers which the subordinate authority may have in the matter. There is no good reason to justify curtailment of the power of the AAC in entertaining an additional ground raised by the assessee in seeking modification of the order of assessment passed by the ITO. This Court further o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version