New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (10) TMI 2482 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

2015 (10) TMI 2482 - MADRAS HIGH COURT - TMI - Seeking return of papers - Assessment order passed by 1st respondent questioned before 2nd respondent and paid an amount of ₹ 16,80,500/- and also furnished bank guarantee for ₹ 33,61,00/- by the petitioner. After having heard the appeal, the 2nd respondent rejected the contentions of the petitioner and dismissed the appeal as not entertainable holding that the dispute cannot be the subject matter of the appeal under Section 51 of the Ac .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

resented by the petitioner before the revisional authority complying with all the formalities. On such presentation, the authority concerned shall entertain the same without any reference to the period of limitation and dispose of the same in accordance with law. Petition disposed of - W.P.Nos.24425 of 2015 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2015 - Dated:- 12-10-2015 - MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN For the Petitioner :Mr. Joseph Prabakar For the Respondent :Mr. V. Haribabu, AGP ORDER Writ petition is filed for the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hat it is engaged in the business of trading of steel coils and manufacturing of automotive parts registered under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax, 2006 with TIN No.33111644181 and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 with registration number CST 1244789. During the year 2013- 2014, the petitioner awarded two contracts to M/s.Fujita Corporation, for ₹ 32.01 crores and ₹ 1.60 crores respectively. After the receipt of the contract, Fujita Corporation obtained two certificates in Form S for n .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s dismissed by order dated 18.06.2015. Hence, the petitioner is before this Court with the prayer as mentioned above. 3. Heard both sides and also perused the records carefully. 4. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the said assessment order was questioned before the Appellate Authority/second respondent and the petitioner paid an amount of ₹ 16,80,500/- and also furnished bank guarantee for ₹ 33,61,00/-. Further, according to him, after having heard the appeal, the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rcumstances in W.P.No.27139 of 2015 by order dated 01.09.2015 this Court has passed the following order: In the result, the writ petition is allowed. The impugned order of the 2nd respondent dismissing the appeal as against levy of tax on TDS and the consequential levy of penalty under Section 27(3) of the TNVAT Act, for want of jurisdiction, is set aside and the 2nd respondent is directed to return all papers to the petitioner within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version