New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (4) TMI 235 - CESTAT CHENNAI

2016 (4) TMI 235 - CESTAT CHENNAI - TMI - Imposition of penalty - Rule 15 (1) of CCR 2004 - Availed Cenvat credit on inputs and service tax paid on input service for the liability of excisable goods - Disallowance of Cenvat credit availed and duty demanded alongwith interest - Appellant submitted that keeping in view the smallness of the disputed duty amount, the penalty of ₹ 10,000/- is too harsh and there is no justification for the same - Held that:- since the dispute involves interpret .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r the Petitioner : Shri M. Kannan, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri R.Subramanian, AC (AR) ORDER Hinduja Foundries Ltd., Sriperumbadur, the appellants herein, are manufacturers of Unmachined Rough Iron Casting and are registered with Central Excise and are availing cenvat credit on inputs and service tax paid on input service for the liability of excisable goods. During the period April 2011 to August 2011, they availed cenvat credit of ₹ 1,03,015/- being service tax paid on various insu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

was reduced to ₹ 10,000/-. The relevant findings and the order of the Commissioner (appeals) are reproduced as under :- 10. Now coming to the aspect of equal penalty impose in the Impugned Order under Rule 15 (1) of the CCR 2004 for short, except for stating that the Appellant has contravened the provisions of the Rules, there is no specific allegation so as to hold that they are guilty of having committed fraud, collusion or suppression of facts or made any wilful misstatement with an in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Insurance Service relating to (i) Standard Fire Insurance Policy & Special Perils Policy (ii) Fire and Special Perils Policy, and (iii) Consequential Loss (Fire) Insurance Policy. The demand along with interest and penalty are set aside to that extent. (2) The Appellant is not eligible to avail credit of Service Tax paid on Money Insurance Policy and Fidelity Guarantee Policy. The demand along with interest are upheld to that extent. (3) The amounts of (i) and (ii) of para-1 alone for the ma .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version