Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

The Pr. Commissioner of Income-Tax-3, Ahmedabad Versus M/s Zealous Web Technologies

2016 (4) TMI 255 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Eligibility for exemption u/s 10B - whether assessee had established a new 100% Export Oriented Undertaking eligible for exemption u/s 10B of the Income Tax Act and not SEZ Unit as held by ITAT? - Held that:- From the facts as emerging from the record, it is evident that the assessee's Unit was granted approval as a 100% Export Oriented Undertaking by a letter of permission dated 02.02.2007, which was ratified in the second meeting of the Board for Approval held on 17.05.2007. The assessee being .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ntly therefore, the conclusion arrived at by the Commissioner of Income Tax is based upon an erroneous finding of fact. The Tribunal, therefore, did not commit any error in holding that the assessee was a 100% Export Oriented Undertaking and not an SEZ Unit and therefore, entitled to deduction under section 10B of the Act. - Decided in favour of assessee - Tax Appeal No. 255 of 2016 - Dated:- 21-3-2016 - Harsha Devani And G. R. Udhwani, JJ. For the Appellant : Mr Varun K Patel, Adv ORDER ( Per : .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

te Tribunal has erred in law and on facts in holding that the respondent assessee had established a new 100% Export Oriented Undertaking eligible for exemption u/s 10B of the Income Tax Act and not SEZ Unit?" 2. The assessment year is 2010-11 and the relevant accounting period is the previous year 2009-10. The assessee, which is assessed in the status of a firm, develops software for foreign clients. The assessee filed its return of income on 17.09.2010 declaring a total income of ₹ 6 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

c Zone had granted it approval under the EOU Scheme by permission letter dated 02.02.2007 as a 100% Export Oriented Unit and not an Undertaking as provided by the Board. He, accordingly, was of the view that the approval permitted to an SEZ (Special Economic Zone) Unit did not carry the same meaning as an Undertaking envisaged under section 10B of the Act. He, therefore, issued a notice dated 04.02.2014 under section 263 of the Act seeking to reverse the assessment made by the Assessing Officer. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

see reiterated its status as a 100% Export Oriented Undertaking instead of an SEZ Unit. The Commissioner of Income Tax, however, did not agree with the submissions advanced by the assessee and was of the view that a 'Unit' under SEZ does not contain the same meaning as an 'undertaking' envisaged in section 10B of the Act. Further as per clause (zc) of section 2 of the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, a 'Unit' means a unit set up by an entrepreneur in a Special Economic Z .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ing the merits of the case, allowed the assessee's appeal. 4. Mr. Varun Patel, learned standing counsel for the appellant, assailed the impugned order by placing reliance upon the findings recorded by the Commissioner of Income Tax and submitted that the assessee not having satisfied the requirements for availing the benefit under section 10B of the Act, the Commissioner of Income-tax had rightly set aside the assessment order. It was submitted that the Tribunal has erred in holding that the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

llant and perused the impugned order passed by the Tribunal, the order under section 263 of the Act as well as the assessment order under section 143(3) of the Act. 6. A perusal of the impugned order reveals that the Tribunal has, upon appreciation of the evidence on record, taken note of the fact that the Development Commissioner, Kandla Special Economic Zone, Ministry of Commerce and Industry had granted approval to the assessee in EOU Scheme 2004-09 for establishment of a new Undertaking at t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Tax's observation that an SEZ Unit cannot be held eligible for section 10B deduction being established outside the defined SEZ. The Tribunal placed reliance upon the decision of the Delhi High Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax v. Enable Export Pvt. Ltd. rendered on 14.09.2009 in ITA No.1072 of 2011, wherein it was held that once the Development Commissioner, exercising powers of the Board of Approval, gives his assent to an Undertaking, the same is valid for claiming deduction .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version