Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Welset Plast Extrusions Pvt. Ltd. Versus ACIT, Mumbai

2016 (4) TMI 297 - ITAT MUMBAI

Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - TDS u/s.194C - Held that:- No payment was made to the transporter by the assessee and thus the assessee is not liable to pay/ deduct the TDS is convincing, hence the present appeal on this ground is accepted. - Decided in favour of assessee. - ITA No. 77/Mum/2013 - Dated:- 15-1-2016 - N. K. BIllaiya, AM And Pawan Singh, JM For the Petitioner : Shri K. Shivaram & Miss Neelam Jadhav For the Respondent : Shri Abani Kanta Nayak (DR) ORDER Per Pawan Singh, JM 1. The p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s A/c. 2. The learned CIT(A) erred in not allowing ₹ 46,644/- treating it as prior period expenses without appreciating that the expenditure was wholly and exclusively incurred for business purpose during the relevant year. 3. The C IT(A) erred in not admitting the additional evidence filed under Rule 46A of the Income Tax Rules without appreciating that the same ought to party (agent) was not responding to the notice u/s 133(6) of the Act. II. Disallowance of freight and Octroi Charges u/ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

disallowed u/s. 40(a)(ia) of the Act. 6. The lamed CIT(A) also failed to appreciate that the payee are assessed to tax an already paid taxes on the said amount and therefore there should not be any disallowance, the aforesaid view is also supported by the amendment made by the Finance Act 2012 inserting proviso to section 40(a)(ia) of the Act which is clarificatory in nature and ought to be applied retrospectively. 7. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, alter or delete any or all the above .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in assessment order dated 30.11.2011, against which an appeal was filed before the CIT(A) including disallowance u/s 40A(ia) for the amount of ₹ 27,69,384/-. 3. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee on the ground of disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) in the impugned order dated 02.011.2012 against which the present appeal is filed before us. 4. We have heard the Authorized Representative (AR) of the assessee and Departmental Representative (DR) of the revenue. At the beginning of making .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nuineness of the transaction. The assessee provided his PAN number and address of Rajesh Singh and shown the Ledger Account about the nature of transaction on which the commission to be paid and date of payment and TDS deducted, the assessee further explained that commission was paid through Account Payee Cheque and even Rajesh Singh was communicated to compliance the notice of Income tax Department and copy of material forwarded to the party were placed on record, however, the submission made b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

der of CIT(A) further revealed that assessee filed an application for additional evidence u/s 46A and the same was dismissed by observing that appellate authority are vested with the discretion to admit or reject the application for production of additional evidence. 7. The Ld AR for the assessee argued that the Ld. CIT(A) has not allowed the application for leading additional evidence and mechanically rejected the same, otherwise the assessee could prove the identity of the party and the genuin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e cheque through which the payment was made was clear in the account of assessee or not ? 10. The assessee seeks opportunity to lead the additional evidence before the CIT(A) to prove the identity of the person and genuineness of the transaction but the same was rejected in a mechanical way without giving any reason, hence, we are of the considered opinion that this issue be remanded to the file of AO, the matter is restored and send to the files of the AO. The AO is directed to decide the issue .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eno Marketing & Trading Co. of ₹ 1,26,940/- (3) Umya India Pvt. Limited of ₹ 3,75,742/- & (4) Reliance Industries Limited of ₹ 80,040/- totaling of ₹ 27,69,384/- in respect of which the assessee was asked to specify if TDS has been deducted in respect of the said amount or not and the assessee vide its reply dated 07.11.2011, explained that the freight & octroi charges were separately charged in the purchase invoice by the supplier. While in booking purchase i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to any resident for carrying out any work in pursuance of contract between the contractor and specified person shall deduct in context on income comprised and the assessee had not deducted tax on reimbursement on freight charges and the same is not allowable as expenditure in view of the provision of section 40(a)(ia). 12. The CIT(A) while dealing with this ground has observed that assessee company has made disbursement of expenses on account of freight and further noticed that assessee-company .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

only to avoid TDS provision and that no doubt that payment made to the transporter is made by assessee-company nor directly but through supplier and the provision of section 194C applicable on freight to pay basis irrespective of actual payment and that the provision of section 40(a)(ia) are clearly applicable. 13. The AR of the assessee is argued that the AO well as CIT(A) misconceived by considering the case of assessee and argued that assessee-company has placed order for purchase of raw-mate .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version