Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

IN RE : ELITECORE TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED

2016 (4) TMI 359 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Scheme of Amalgamation - Held that:- The Official Liquidator has opined that the affairs of the Petitioner Transferor Company have not been conducted in a manner prejudicial to the interest of its members or to the public interest. In the view of this Court, there does not appear to be any impediment to the grant of sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation. From the material on record and upon perusal of the Scheme, it appears to be fair, and reasonable and does not appear to contain any clause th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

VERNMENT STANDING COUNSEL FOR MR DEVANG VYAS, ADVOCATE, MRS MAUNA M BHATT, ADVOCATE ORAL ORDER 1 This petition has been filed by the Petitioner Company for the sanction of scheme of Amalgamation between Elitecore Technologies Private Limited (Petitioner Transferor Company) and Sterlite Technologies (Transferee Company) and their respective shareholders and creditors ( Scheme ) under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, along with the corresponding provisions of Companies Act, 2013. 2 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he group, optimal utilization of resources and better administration and cost reduction. 3 It has been pointed out that vide the order dated 22nd January, 2016, passed in the Company Application No. 30 of 2016, the meetings of the Equity Shareholders and Secured Creditors were dispensed with, in view of the written consent letters of all the Equity Shareholders and Secured Creditors. The meeting of the Unsecured Creditors was dispensed with in view of the fact that there is no Arrangement and/or .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

bruary, 2016. The publication in the Government gazette was dispensed with. 5 Notice of the petition has been served upon the Regional Director (Western Region). In response thereto, Shri Devang Vyas, Assistant Solicitor General of India has filed his appearance in the petition and affidavits dated 11th March,2016 and 16th March, 2016 have been filed by the Regional Director, NorthWestern Region, Ministry of Corporate Affairs. 6 In the above affidavit, the Regional Director has, inter alia, made .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t filed by the Regional Director it is submitted that the Petitioner Company undertake to comply with the provisions of the Income Tax Act and Rules framed thereunder. Further, it is observed by the Regional Director in Para 2 of Affidavit dated 16.03.2016 that the Petitioner Company has outstanding income tax year demand for the Assessment Years, 201112, 201213 and that the Petitioner Company has been selected for scrutiny for Assessment Years, 201314 and 201415. It is further submitted that th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e Circulars of SEBI as well as NSE and BSE. In response to the second observation made by the Regional Director, learned advocate for the petitioner relies on the affidavit dated 16.03.2016, filed on behalf of the petitioner company and submits that, as mentioned in the said affidavit, clause 6.1 of the Scheme specifically envisages about the compliance of the AS14. 9 In response to the third observation made on behalf of Income Tax Department, it is submitted that the Petitioner Company underta .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cordingly, the aforementioned tax demands would, subject to the outcome of the appeals in this regard, be payable, if required, by the Transferee Company. 10 It may be noted that the Regional Director in his affidavit has also stated that as per the report of the Registrar of Companies there is no complaint against the petitioner companies. 11 In response to the notice issued by this Court, the Official Liquidator has filed his Report dated 14th March, 2016, wherein, it is, inter alia, stated th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d that in view of the report of the Chartered Accountants, the affairs of the Petitioner Transferor Company have not been conducted in a manner prejudicial to the interest of its members or to the public interest in terms of the second proviso to section 394(1) of the Companies Act, 1956 and, therefore, the Petitioner Transferor Company may be dissolved without being woundup. 12 As regards the observation raised by the Official Liquidator in his report that the Petitioner Transferor Company be d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

would not be absolved from any of its statutory liabilities in any manner. 13 This Court has heard Ms. Dharmishta Raval, learned advocate for the petitioner, Mr. Kshitij Amin, learned Central Government Standing Counsel on behalf of Mr. Devang Vyas, learned Assistant Solicitor General of India, and Ms. Mauna M Bhatt, learned advocate for the Income Tax Department. 14 In view of the above discussion, it transpires that the observations made by the Regional Director have been addressed. The Offic .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version