GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
What's New Case Laws Highlights Articles News Forum Short Notes Statutory TMI SMS More ...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (4) TMI 363 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

2016 (4) TMI 363 - MADRAS HIGH COURT - 2016 (336) E.L.T. 270 (Mad.) - Whether the Tribunal erred in relying upon the statement of one Sundaram when the said statement was not made available to the appellants either through the show cause notice or during the proceedings before the learned Collector (Appeals) - Seizure conducted on 16.6.1992 in the business premises of the assessee by name T.R.Nanniar (who is now no more) and seized 6 silver ingots weighing 19.165 kilograms, on a reasonable belie .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of Sundaram. The seizure took place about 24 years ago. The reference itself was of the year 2000. Today, even if the contention that Sundaram ought to have been produced for cross-examination is upheld, the matter has to be remitted back, but, it is impossible to produce Sundaram for cross-examination. - Therefore, taking into account the developments and also taking into account the admission made by Nanniar, the Tribunal did not commit any mistake in relying upon the statement. - Decided .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

daram when the said statement was not made available to the appellants either through the show cause notice or during the proceedings before the learned Collector (Appeals)? 2) Whether the decision of the Tribunal that because no cross-examination was asked for, therefore, the non-supply of the said statement of Sundaram to the appellants during the course of proceedings before the learned Collector (Appeals) does not violate the principles of natural justice is correct in law?" 2. Heard Mr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Act, 1962. 4. Subsequently, Nanniar retracted his statement on 19.6.1992. In the meantime, the silver bars were assayed and found to be of purity ranging from 99.42 to 99.51. 5. A show cause notice was issued on 10.12.1992 proposing confiscation and imposition of penalty. After a reply was sent, an order in original dated 4.8.1993 was passed confiscating the silver bars and imposing a penalty. The said order was confirmed by the Commissioner (Appeals) on 23.12.1993. 6. However, on an appeal made .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Advanced Search


Latest Notifications:

    Dated      Category

20-7-2017 Cus (NT)

20-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

19-7-2017 IT

19-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 CE (NT)

18-7-2017 CE

18-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

15-7-2017 Kerala SGST

14-7-2017 Andhra Pradesh SGST

14-7-2017 Cus (NT)

14-7-2017 Cus

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 ADD

13-7-2017 ADD

12-7-2017 Jammu & Kashmir SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 CGST Rate

More Notifications


Latest Circulars:

21-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

20-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

20-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

19-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

19-7-2017 Income Tax

18-7-2017 Customs

17-7-2017 Customs

14-7-2017 Income Tax

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

More Circulars



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version