Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

D.E. Shaw India Advisory Services Pvt. Ltd. Versus DCIT, Circle-7 (1) , New Delhi

Stay of demand - Held that:- Delay in deciding the appeal cannot be attributed to the assessee. The stay is extended for a period of six months or disposal of appeal whichever is earlier. It goes without saying that no adjournment on any unreasonable ground shall be sought by the assessee on the next date of hearing - S. A. 211/Del/2016 (In ITA No.-1681/Del/2015) - Dated:- 7-4-2016 - Smt Diva Singh, Judicial Member And Sh. L. P. Sahu, Accountant Member For the Appellant : Mr. Ajit Tolani, Adv Fo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed by another period of six months. Referring to the record it was submitted that the assessee has been ready to argue the appeal on all the dates the appeal came up for hearing. It was submitted that infact the hearing had concluded on 03.09.2015 and thereafter it was re-fixed for clarification on a few dates and finally released for a fresh hearing. Thus it was submitted that the hearing has not concluded in the stipulated period of one year on account of no fault of the assessee. 3. Mr. A.Gov .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eady been granted by the ITAT. In the circumstances, we deem it appropriate to extract the relevant provisions of the income Tax Act, 1961 for ready-reference:- 254. Orders of Appellate Tribunal - (1) The Appellate Tribunal may, after giving both the parties to the appeal an opportunity of being heard, pass such orders thereon as it thinks fit. (2A) In every appeal, the Appellate Tribunal, where it is possible, may hear and decide such appeal within a period of four years from the end of the fin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ovided further that where such appeal is not so disposed of within the said period of stay as specified in the order of stay, the Appellate Tribunal may, on an application made in this behalf by the assessee and on being satisfied that the delay in disposing of the appeal is not attributable to the assessee, extend the period of stay, or pass an order of stay for a further period or periods as it thinks fit; so, however, that the aggregate of the period originally allowed and the period or perio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the expiry of such period or periods, even if the delay in disposing of the appeal is not attributable to the assessee. 4.1. A plain reading of the above makes it clear that the Statute has vested the ITAT with the power to grant stay initially for a period of six months in terms of the first proviso to sub-section (2A) of section 254. In case the appeal is not decided within the said period, the second proviso, on an application by the assessee, empowers the Tribunal to further extend stay for .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ch of the High Court in the case of Maruti Suzuki s was not called upon to examine the Constitutional validity of the third proviso to Section 254(2A) of the said Act and the said issue had been left open. Thus examining the amendment carried out by the Finance Act, 2008 in the third proviso which introduced the words even if the delay in disposing of the appeal is not attributable to the assessee the Jurisdictional High Court held that the Legislature created a hostile discrimination against th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, the petitioners are correct in their submission that unequals have been treated equally. Assessees who, after having obtained stay orders and by their conduct delay the appeal proceedings, have been treated in the same manner in which assessees, who have not, in any way, delayed the proceedings in the appeal. The two classes of assessees are distinct and cannot be clubbed together. This clubbing together has led to hostile discrimination against the assessees to whom the delay is not attributa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ds. On the contrary, the clubbing together of 'well behaved' assessees and those who cause delay in the appeal proceedings is itself violative of Article 14 of the Constitution and has no nexus or connection with the object sought to be achieved. The said expression introduced by the Finance Act, 2008 is, therefore, struck down as being violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. This would revert us to the position of law as interpreted by the Bombay High Court in Narang Overs .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

2016. For ready-reference, we extract the following paras from M/s Sunlife India Services Centre Pvt. Ltd. vs DCIT :- 7.2. Thus on considering the judicial precedent, we find that there is no impediment to the Tribunal to extend stay for a period beyond 365 days in deserving cases. Reliance may also be placed on order dated 01.02.2016 in SA No.-18/Del/2016 in ITA No.414/Del/2015 in the case M/s Jaypee Infratech Ltd.vs ACIT. In the said background reverting to the facts of the present case we fin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

have no hesitation in holding that the adjournments moved on behalf of the assessee could not be considered to be an act of delaying the disposal of appeals or to drag out the hearing after having obtained the stay. We find that more or less factually similar position was considered by the Hon ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in PML Industries Ltd. vs CCE [2013] 22 GSTR 83 (P&H) which was relied upon by the petitioners before the Hon ble Delhi High Court in Pepsi Foods Pvt.Ltd. (cited su .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

vision indicated that the waiver would stand vacated after 180 days. In that context, the question arose, as to whether the second proviso to sub-section (2A) of section 35C was directory and that the Tribunal, in appropriate circumstances, could extend the period of stay beyond 180 days. While considering the said question, the Punjab and Haryana High Court held as under (page 117 of 22 GSTR) : "Though the right of appeal is a creation of Statute and it can be exercised only subject to the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

uty demanded and penalty levied, if the appeal is not decided within 180 days. The assessee has no control in respect of matters pending before the Tribunal ; in the matter of availability of infrastructure ; the members of the Tribunal and the workload. Therefore, for the reason that the Tribunal is not able to decide appeal within 180 days, the vacation of stay is a harsh and onerous and unreasonable condition. The condition of vacation of stay for the inability of the Tribunal to decide the a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

assessee in delay or avoiding the decision of appeal, so as to warrant an order of vacation of stay. If the provision is not read down in the manner mentioned above, such condition suffers from illegality rendering the right of appeal as redundant . . . Consequently, the second proviso in sub-section (2A) of section 35C is ordered to be read down to mean that after 180 days, the Revenue has a right to seek vacation of stay on proof of the fact that the assessee is the one, who is defaulted or ta .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r the facts of the present case. On considering the facts which are found recorded in the Court proceedings by way of order sheet entries in ITA No.1681/Del/2015, we find that hearing in ITA No.-1681/Del/2015 stood concluded as per record on 03.09.2015. Thereafter, the appeal was fixed for clarification by the Co-ordinate Bench on 05.11.2015 in terms of the following direction:- 05.11.2015 Refix the matter for certain clarification on 24th Nov.2015. Issue notice. Sd/ (Suchitra Kamble) Sd/- (S.V. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

venue. On 02.02.2015 it was adjourned on the request of the Revenue to 04.04.2016 i.e. today and even today it has been adjourned on the written request of the Revenue. 4.5. Accordingly, we find from the record that except for seeking an adjournment on 24.11.2015 on all the other dates the appeal has been adjourned on the request of the Revenue. The circumstances which led the assessee to seek an adjournment on 24.11.2015 can be best addressed in assessee s own version by referring to the applic .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Manpower Service provider

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: ‘DUTY DRAWBACK’ CANNOT BE EQUATED WITH ‘REBATE OF DUTY’

Forum: GST on Notional rent

Highlight: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

News: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

Highlight: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

Highlight: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Non-payment of service tax - maintenance and repair charges - appellants had knowingly and deliberately shown the repair charges as job work charges to mislead about their taxability - demand confirmed.

Highlight: BAS - execution of the project of smart card for vehicle registration – implementing the SOC-VRC project - The fact that the Government has outsourced some part of the work and paid certain consideration for such outsourced work, does not make the activity subject to service tax.

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

Circular: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg.

News: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg. - Trade Notice

Highlight: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg. - Various amendments are made in Chapter-4 of Hand Book of Procedures 2015-2020.

Forum: GST rates on mobile recharge business

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version