Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2016 (1) TMI 1093

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Kejriwal, CIT DR ORDER Per N. K. Saini, AM: This is an appeal by the assessee against the order dated 16.07.2014 of ld. CIT(A)-XXXII, New Delhi. 2. Following grounds have been raised in this appeal: 1. That having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in not deleting the adhoc addition of ₹ 2,10,000/- fully as made by Ld. AO and has further erred in sustaining the addition to the extent of ₹ 2,10,000/- on account of house hold withdrawals u/s 69C of Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. That in any case and in any view of the matter, action of Ld. CIT(A) in not deleting the adhoc addition to the extent of ₹ 2,10,000/- fully as made by Ld. AO is bad in .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e assessee at the very outset stated that the issue under consideration is covered vide order dated 19.10.2015 in ITA Nos. 501 502/Del/2015 for the assessment years 2008-09 2009-10 respectively in assessee s own case (copy of the said order was furnished which is placed on record). 6. In his rival submissions the ld. DR supported the orders of the authorities below and further submitted that the assessee was one of the assessees on whom the Income Tax Department has conducted a search and multiple government agencies like CBI, Enforcement Directorate, Delhi Police etc. were investigating the alleged fraud done by them during Common Wealth Games, New Delhi, 2010 by getting the contracts directly or indirectly for organizing, construct .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ndings have been given in paras 5 6 of the order dated 19.10.2015 which read as under: 5. Admittedly no incriminating material was found or seized during the course of search and seizure operation u/s. 132 of the Act in the case of the assessee. It is also not in dispute, that the assessment for both these assessment years have not abated. Under the circumstances, I find that the issue is covered in favour of the assesee and against the Revenue by the decision dated 28.8.2015 of the Hon ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT vs. Kabul Chawla passed in ITA No. 707, 709 and 713/2014 held has under:- 37. On a conspectus of Section 153A(1) of the Act, read with the provisos thereto, and in the light of the law explained in the af .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... er this Section only on the basis of seized material. v. In absence of any incriminating material, the completed assessment can be reiterated and the abated assessment or reassessment can be made. The word 'assess' in Section 153 A is relatable to abated proceedings (i.e. those pending on the date of search) and the word 'reassess' to completed assessment proceedings. vi. Insofar as pending assessments are concerned, the jurisdiction to make the original assessment and the assessment under Section 153A merges into one. Only one assessment shall be made separately for each AY on the basis of the findings of the search and any other material existing or brought on the record of the AO. vii. Completed assessm .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates