Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s R.N. Gupta & Co Ltd. Versus ACIT

Computation of deduction u/s 80HHC on account of income by way of Duty Entitlement Pass Book (DEPB) - See M/s Fitex Industries And Ors. Versus ACIT [2011 (6) TMI 844 - ITAT CHANDIGARH] - Decided in favour of assessee. - ITA Nos. 926 to 928/Chd/2011 - Dated:- 21-11-2011 - SHRI H.L.KARWA, HON'BLE, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI D.K.SRIVASTAVA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER For the Petitioner : None For the Respondent : Smt. Jyoti Kumari ORDER PER H.L.KARWA, VP These three appeals filed by the assessee involving .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of Kalpataru Colours and Chemicals ignoring the specific directions of the Hon'ble Tribunal for deciding the issue on the basis of Special Bench Judgment in the case of M/s Topman Exports v ITO. 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee is engaged in the business of manufacturing of steel forgings rigs and accessories. While framing the assessments for the year under consideration, the Assessing Officer disallowed the deduction claimed u/s 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f CIT(A) before the Tribunal. 5. We have heard Smt. Jyoti Kumari, Ld. DR at length and have also perused the materials available on record. 6. The issue arising in these appeals relates to computation of deduction u/s 80HHC of the Income Tax Act on account of income by way of Duty Entitlement Pass Book (DEPB). The issue was decided by the Chandigarh Bench of the Tribunal vide order dated 31.8.2009 following the decision of a Special Bench of Mumbai Tribunal in M/s Topman Exports v ITO (2009) 29 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

wable on such receipts u/s 80HHC observed after hearing the rival contentions of the parties that the view taken by Mumbai Bench in the case of M/s Topman Exports v ITO (supra) and M/s Kalpataru Chemicals v ACIT (ITA No. 5769/Mum/2006 and 5851/Mum/2006 order dated 11.8.2009, has been reversed by the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in CIT v Kalapataru Colour & Chemical (2010) 328 ITR 451 (Bom). The Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court held as under:- 6. After hearing learned counsel for .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

arh Bench of the Tribunal in the case of M/s Fitex Industries v ACIT-V, Ludhiana & Others in ITA No. 956/Chad/2006 relating to assessment years 2003-04 and others. The Tribunal vide its order dated 30.6.2011 after keeping in view of the observations and the directions of the Hon'ble High Court in the case of CIT Vs F.C.Sondhi and Co P.Ltd (2011) (2011) 334 ITR 141 (P&H) and following the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of CIT v Kalapatru Colours and C .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

h made by the Finance Minister while introducing the said amendment in 2005 and had also considered the reasons for the introduction of clause (iiid) in section 28 of the Act in view of the decision of Delhi Bench of the Tribunal in the case of P& G Enterprises (93 ITD 138) (Del) and had observed as under : 32. The Tribunal has relied to a considerable extent on a speech made by the then Finance Minister on the floor of Parliament in support of its conclusion that only the premium realized b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

fer of the DEPB credit and not the amount that was received in excess of the face value of the DEPB credit. As a matter of fact in that case the assessee had claimed that the entire receipt on the transfer of the DEPB credit including the face value of the credit as profits under section 28(iiia). The Tribunal in that case held that the entirety of the amount would be covered by section 28(iv). However, the view of the Tribunal was that since Explanation (baa) in section 80HHC did not envisage t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dit which was sought to be included in section 28(iv) was brought in by Parliamentary amendment in the form of an insertion of clause (iiid) in section 28 with retrospective effect. There was no controversy regarding the taxability of the quantum of receipts on the transfer of the DEPB credit. Hence, for these reasons we are of the view that it cannot be inferred from the speech of the Finance Minister that the insertion of clause (iiid) in section 28 was made with a view to tax only the amount .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

st the credit against the customs duty payable on any goods imported into India. However, where an exporter instead of utilizing the credit transfers the credit at a premium, it cannot be said that the exporter has utilized the credit ; (ii) the Legislature considers that the customs duty and excise duty paid on raw materials used in the export product, when repaid or repayable as duty drawback, would not constitute export profit. Similarly, when the DEPB credit is not utilized in the business b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ld be excluded while computing the deduction under section 80HHC ; (iii) Parliament considered that an exporter who instead of utilizing the DEPB credit for paying customs duty on imported goods, makes a profit by transferring the DEPB, would form a separate class and seeks to tax the receipts on the transfer of the DEPB credit as business profits and not export profits. Exporters who transfer the DEPB credit and make a profit cannot be placed on par with those exporters who utilize the credit f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

transfer of the DEPB credit in excess of the face value of the DEPB and the amount received to the extent of the face value of the DEPB would be covered under section 28(iiib). There is no merit in this contention because (a) the DEPB credit was not in existence when section 28(iiib) was inserted by the Finance Act of 1990. DEPB credit was introduced with effect from April 1, 1997 which was after the insertion of clause (iiib) in section 28 ; (b) section 28(iiib) refers to cash assistance (by wh .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

amount received in excess of the face value of the DEPB. 47. Respectfully following the abovesaid ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in Kalaptaru Colours & Chemicals(supra) we find no merit in the stand of the assessee that DEPB credit has a face value and while determining the profits eligible for deduction under section 80HHC of the Act, only the profits arising on the transfer of DEPB credit are to be excluded. As observed by us in para 42 above the DEPB credit being an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version