Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Shri Manoj Vithaldas Meswani Versus Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-19 (2) , Mumbai

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee claiming benefit u/s 54 - Held that:- In the present case, in our opinion the assessee has neither concealed his income nor has furnished inaccurate particulars of income. The assessee had disclosed all and furnished the particulars with regard to the said sale of property in the return of income and also declared capital gain after claiming benefit u/s 54 of the Act in respect of flat at Rameshwar Co-Op.Hsg Soc, Santa Cruz (W), Mumbai besides claiming the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e Act cannot be sustained - Decided in favour of assessee - I.T.A. No.7967/Mum/2010 - Dated:- 9-3-2016 - SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JM AND SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, AM For The Appellant : Shri Kantilal B Parekh For The Respondent : Shri Navin Guptra ORDER PER RAJESH KUMAR, AM : This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order dated 28.06.2010 passed by the ld.CIT(A)-30, Mumbai and it relates to the assessment year 1995-96. 2. Sole ground raised in this appeal is against the confirmation of penalty levi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nd in 1970. The property consisted of land of about 1003 sq.yards and building comprising ground, first and 2nd floor. During the financial year the assessee entered into an agreement dated 11.9.1993 with M/s Lake End Constructions Pvt Ltd for transfer of the said building for a consideration of ₹ 1,30,00,000/- for development, however retained the first floor of the said building admeasuring about 1800 sq. ft. Subsequently, the assessee made another agreement with the said company dated 2 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

is constructed and it handed over 1800 sq.ft area on the first floor to the assessee. The assessee declared the sale of property in the return of income by showing sale consideration of ₹ 1,30,00,000 and cost of acquisition after indexation at ₹ 64,86,946/- which was calculated on the basis of register valuar s report, valuing the property at ₹ 21,05,573/- and from the capital gain so calculated the assessee claimed deduction of ₹ 40,27,575/- u/s 54 in respect of the prop .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on the sale of the property and also that the expenses on brokerage charges was claimed at ₹ 4,50,000/- as against ₹ 2.6 lakhs being 2 per cent on the sale consideration of ₹ 1,30,00,000/-. The assessment u/s 147 r.w. section 143(3) of the Act was completed on 27.3.2002 by taking sale consideration for sale of property known as Madhu Sadan to be ₹ 2,25,00,000/- instead of ₹ 1,30,00,000/- shown by the assessee. The AO determined the sale consideration of the propert .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

059/- after allowing deduction of ₹ 40,27,575/- u/s 54 of the Act qua new flat purchased. 4. The matter travelled up to the Tribunal, however the assessee despite taking the ground against taking of sale considerations at ₹ 2,25,00,000/- did not press the same and pressed only for allowing relief under section 54 in respect of ₹ 95,00,000/-. The Tribunal allowed the second ground of appeal in favour of the assessee as the assessee did not press the first ground of the appeal. T .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

0/- on the ground that the assessee furnished in accurate particulars of income and suppressed her income. Aggrieved by the order of the AO, the assessee preferred an appeal before the ld.CIT(A) who confirmed the action of the AO by holding as under : For the above reasons, I am inclined to hold that the value of the flat will constitute part of the consideration for sale of the property by the assessee. The value of the flat has been taken by the AO at ₹ 95 Lacs on the basis of the value .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ere only transaction was sought to be executed. It is only to seek the deduction twice that two agreements were entered into. When appeal was filed by the appellant against this order of CIT(A) Supra before ITAT, the appellant did not dispute the determination of the sale consideration of ₹ 2.25 Crore even though in the grounds of appeal filed, it has duly raised this issue. It is evident from the perusal of details especially the order of the ITAT in the appellant's own case Supra tha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

posed with the provision of sec.271 (1)(c) of Income Tax Act, 1961 it is evident that the appellant is caught by the mischief of Explanation 1 to sec.271 (1 )(c). The explanation offered by the appellant is found to be false and the falsity of the claim of the appellant has to be appreciated in the background of incorrect claim made by the appellant. It's claim that there were two agreements and two different transactions - one by agreement dt.11.09.1993 and another by agreement dt.20.07.199 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ntered into by the appellant by executing two deeds which has been held as 'Sham' clearly attracts penalty, as held by Mumbai IT AT in the case of M/s Ultramarine & Pigments Ltd v. ACIT reported in (2010), 38 DTR 42. The crux of the observation of the Mumbai ITAT in the case of Ultramarine (Supra) is that where the assessee has entered into an artificial arrangement of purchase and lease back transactions to evade tax liability and the transactions having found to be bogus, penalty u .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ter development to the assessee which was also condition in the old agreement dated 11.9.1993. The ld. Counsel submitted that the contention of assessee that interest free security deposit of ₹ 95 lakhs was to be refunded when the builder handed over the possession of the area of 1800 sq. Ft on the first floor of the property and in the event the builder backing out its commitments under the said agreement at-least the assessee would forfeit the security and thus the assessee was placed in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

assessee did not press ground before the Tribunal relating to sales consideration of ₹ 2,25,00,000/- which do not mean that the assessee concealed any income or furnished in accurate particulars of her income. The Co-ordinate Bench directed that the benefit u/s 54 of the Act be allowed in respect of ₹ 95 lakhs. The ld. Counsel, prayed that in view of the above facts, which proved unequivocally that no transfer of 1800 Sq Fts on the first floor of the new property had been taken place .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: GST return filing software online | Easy GST compliance management

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Input tax credit

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

Forum: GST on Notional rent

Forum: GST ON SALES PROMOTION

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?

Notification: TDS liability under Section 51 of CGST, 2017 come into force w.e.f. 18-9-2017 - Persons liable to deduct TDS from payment made or credited to the supplier of taxable goods or services specified

Notification: Central Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2017

Notification: Seeks to extend the last date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August to December, 2017

Circular: Filing of Special Leave Petition against Orders of Hon'ble High Courts staying Collection of Tax under GST- reg.

Highlight: Exemption u/s 54F - LTCCG - once entire net consideration is invested, the absence of completion certificate cannot be a ground to deny the benefit of deduction.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version