Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Asst Commissioner of Income-tax Circle 7 (1) , Hyderabad Versus M/s. IVRCL CR 18G Consortium, Hyderabad and Asst Commissioner of Income-tax Circle 7 (1) , Hyderabad Versus M/s. CR 18G IVRCL JV, Hyderabad

2016 (4) TMI 569 - ITAT HYDERABAD

TDS credit to the assessee - CIT(A) allowed the claim - Held that:- CIT(A) by considering Income Tax (8th Amendment) Rules, 2011, observed that in the case of the assessee, the payment for work contract was made to the assessee by Bangalore Metro Railway Corporation(deductee); the assessee recorded the receipts of ₹ 69,97,50,697 in its books as its turnover; that what is relevant for purposes of S.199 and Rule 37B(2)(i) is whether the contract receipts formed part of the income computation .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y the fact that the contract receipts constitute its turnover and the income therefrom was assessable in the hands of the assessee. It is also observed by the learned CIT(A) that it is irrelevant whether the project resulted in a profit for the assessee or whether the assessee chose to sub-contract it to IVRCL on a no-margin basis. With these observations and also by following the decision of the jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT V/s. Bhooratnam & Co.(2013 (1) TMI 478 - ANDHRA PRADESH .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Member : These appeals filed by the Revenue are directed against similar but separate orders of the Commissioner of Incometax( Appeals)-3, Hyderabad, both dated 19.12.2014, for the assessment year 2011-12. Since a common issue is involved in both these appeals concerning two assessees, who are partners of a joint venture, these appeals are being disposed of by this common order for the sake of convenience. 2. The only common issue involved in these appeals relates to disallowance of TDS credit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

participating in two tenders of Bangalore Metro Railway Corporation Ltd. for ₹ 92.5 crores and ₹ 71.52 crores respectively. On being awarded these contracts, the members of the consortium entered into internal MOUs (dated 30.9.2008 and 30.10.2008) under which it was agreed that compensation fee of 2% of the project value could be paid to CR18G and that IVRCL would be fully responsible for execution of the projects and perform and complete the projects. The entire project was awarded .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to IVRCL on back to back basis; that income offered by the assessee was only the compensation fee paid to one of the members of the consortium; and that no income had been offered out of contract receipts, as no work has been executed by the assessee. For these reasons and by relying on Rule 37BA(2)(i) of the IT Rules, the claim of the assessee for TDS credit was rejected by the Assessing Officer. 6. On appeal, the learned CIT(A) directed the Assessing Officer to give credit for the TDS and allo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the purpose of giving credit in respect of tax deducted at source or' paid in terms of the provisions of Chapter XVII of the Act, make such rules as may be necessary, including the rules for the purpose of giving credit to a person other than those referred to in sub section (1) and sub section (2) and also the assessment year for which such credit may be given 8. Rule 37BA of the Rules framed under Section 199(3) of the Act (introduced with effect from 01-04-2009 by Income Tax (Sixth Amend .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

orised by such authority. (2) (i) If the income on which tax has been deducted a source is assessable in the hands of a person other than the deductee, credit for tax deducted at source shall be given to the other person in cases where- (a) the income of the deductee is included in the total income. of another person under the provisions of section 60, section 61, section 64, section 93 or section 94; (b) the income of a deductee being an association of person or a trust is assessable in the han .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n the same proportion as their ownership of the asset: Provided that the deductee files a declaration with the deductor and the deductor reports the tax deduction in the name of the other person in the information relating to deduction of tax referred to in sub-rule (1). (ii) The declaration filed by the deductee under clause (i) shall contain the name, address, permanent account number of the person to whom credit is to be given, payment or credit in relation to which credit is to be given and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and paid to the Central Government and the income is assessable over a number of years, credit for tax deducted at source shall be allowed across those years in the same proportion in which the income is assessable to tax. (4) Credit for tax deducted at source and paid to the account of the Central Government shall be granted on the basis of - (i) the information relating to deduction of tax furnished by the deductor to the income-tax authority or the person authorized by such authority: and (i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s of a person other than the deductee, credit for the whole or any part of the tax deducted at source, as the case may be, shall be given to the other person and not to the deductee" 10. This amendment has done away with the specified four clauses in the pre-amended Rule 37BA which restricted the benefit of the rule only in four specified situations. It has thus widened the scope of the rule 37 BA thereby enabling the credit of taxes to the actual payee in whose hands the income is assessab .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

#8377; 69,97,5O,617 in its books as its turnover. What is relevant for the purpose of sec.199 and rule 37BA is whether the contract receipt formed part of the income computation of the appellant. The fact that the contract receipts were credited to the P&L a/c shows that it was. 13. There is no requirement in the Act that the appellant should execute the works itself. Indeed, it is not possible for any person, leave alone a legal entity like a consortium, to physically execute a mammoth cont .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

IT v Bhooratnam & Co. [2013] 357 ITR 396 (AP). In this case, the assessee had entered into a JV agreement for the purposes of preparing and submitting a tender. The Assessing Officer refused to give credit for TDS on the ground that some of the certificates belonged to the JV and some other certificates were in the names of directors and did not relate to the assessee-firm/company. The ITAT accepted the contention of the assessee that the income included in the TDS certificates had been cons .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. However, the ratio of the above decisions applies to the appellant: credit for TDS has to be given to the appellant since the payments on which TDS had been made had been taken into account while assessing the income of the appellant. 7. Being aggrieved, Revenue carried the matter in appeal before us. 8. But for the amounts involved, factual background involved in the other appeal concerning CR18G IVRCL JV, is the same, and the TDS involved for which credit was claimed by the assessee, but dis .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version