GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
What's New Case Laws Highlights Articles News Forum Short Notes Statutory TMI SMS More ...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (4) TMI 596 - CESTAT MUMBAI

2016 (4) TMI 596 - CESTAT MUMBAI - 2016 (45) S.T.R. 440 (Tri. - Mumbai) - Demand of differential tax - Commercial or industrial construction service - non-inclusion of free supplies values in gross receipts before applying abatement of 67% allowed in notification no. 15/2004-ST, dated 10.9.2004. - Held that:- there is no doubt that the value of free supplies has not been included for computing tax liability by the appellant. The logic of essentiality of the material so supplied by the recipi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to say, that the use of 'gross receipts' is intended to enable coverage of non-monetised consideration. Mutually agreed upon compensatory payments that are not reflected in invoices are intended to be captured for computing tax liability. Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 flows from the legislative empowerment in section 67 of Finance Act,1994 and the tax collector does not have the authority to read beyond the Rules and to adapt the provisions of section 67 for devising a formul .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

43/2010 - A/86240/2016-WZB/STB - Dated:- 9-9-2015 - M V Ravindran, Member (J) And C J Mathew, Member (T) For the Appellant : Shri A K Prabhakar, Adv For the Respondent : Shri R K Das, Deputy Commissioner (AR) ORDER Per C J Mathew M/s Jaiswal Builders & Contractors is in appeal before us against Order-in-Original No: 06/2009/ST/C dated 30 th October 2009 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Nagpur in which differential tax of ₹ 1,08,64,788/- inclusive of cess has .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eafter by notification no. 1/2006-ST dated 1 st March 2006. 2. The proceedings against appellant were initiated on the ground that they were in receipt of material from M/s Raymonds Ltd and the value thereof should also have been included in the gross value before availing the abatement specified in the said exemption notifications. Allegedly, the computation of tax liability on the amount of ₹ 13,64,45,944/- received as payment from M/s Raymonds Ltd was not sufficient discharge of tax due .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

1 st March 2005 an explanation was inserted in the notification to ensure that computation of the 'gross amount charged' included 'the value of goods and materials supplied or provided or used by the provider of the construction service for providing such service.' 4. While the said explanation continued to find a place in the successor notification of 2006, the impugned order has extended its applicability to the period prior to 1 st March 2005 by reference to the ratio of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n notification no. 15/2004-ST dated 10 th September 2004 (and its successor notification no. 1/2006 dated 1 st March 2006) was contrary to law. In his elaborate order, the adjudicating authority has also dwelt at length on the indispensability of the supplied materials for the rendering of 'commercial or industrial construction service' and asserts that the value of the free supplies cannot but be a part and parcel of the contract. The adjudicating authority further asserts that the incl .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

at the intent of legislature not to exclude free supplies. To buttress the argument that additional consideration cannot escape the tax net, the impugned order refers to and cites liberally a catena of judicial pronouncements, viz., Free India Dry Accumulators Limited v Union of India [1999 (107) ELT 290 (SC)], Ubique Metamed Pvt Ltd. vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Bolpur [2006(199) ELT 514 (Tri-Kolkatta)], Commissioner of Central Excise,Mumbai - III, v Uniabex Alloy Products Ltd [2009(236) .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dia [2003 (160) ELT 42 (Raj), Burn Standard Co. Ltd v. Union of India [1992 (60) ELT 671 (SC)] and Motherson Sumi Systems Ltd v Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut [2002 (147) ELT 1121 (Tri-Del)]. 8. There is no doubt that the value of free supplies has not been included for computing tax liability by the appellant. The logic of essentiality of the material so supplied by the recipient of service is not comprehensible; the terms of supply are merely matters of commercial agreement between the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

monetised consideration. Mutually agreed upon compensatory payments that are not reflected in invoices are intended to be captured for computing tax liability. Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 flows from the legislative empowerment in section 67 of Finance Act,1994 and the tax collector does not have the authority to read beyond the Rules and to adapt the provisions of section 67 for devising a formula that is, in his mind, compatible with his sense of equity and harmony. 9. Juxt .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ework and it is that framework which portrays legislative intent. Non-articulation of a specific exclusion is not a ground to blind oneself to the legal constraints on inclusion of amounts in 'gross amount' of consideration. 10. We find that the issue is squarely covered by the decision of this Tribunal in Bhayana Builders (P) Ltd v. Commissioner of Service Tax, Delhi [2013 (32) STTR 49 (Tri-LB)] in which that specific question was decided as follows: "15. From the several aids to i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Advanced Search


Latest Notifications:

    Dated      Category

20-7-2017 Cus (NT)

20-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

19-7-2017 IT

19-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 CE (NT)

18-7-2017 CE

18-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

15-7-2017 Kerala SGST

14-7-2017 Andhra Pradesh SGST

14-7-2017 Cus (NT)

14-7-2017 Cus

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 ADD

13-7-2017 ADD

12-7-2017 Jammu & Kashmir SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 CGST Rate

More Notifications


Latest Circulars:

21-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

20-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

20-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

19-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

19-7-2017 Income Tax

18-7-2017 Customs

17-7-2017 Customs

14-7-2017 Income Tax

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

More Circulars



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version