GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (4) TMI 666 - ITAT MUMBAI

2016 (4) TMI 666 - ITAT MUMBAI - TMI - Disallowance of claim of "Provision for Expenses" - Held that:- There appears to be no dispute that a liability is imposed upon the assessee to construct certain premises at free of cost and under normal circumstances, it would form part of the project expenditure and is liable to be deducted against the project revenue. However, the peculiar facts brought on record by the tax authorities show that the liability of the assessee is contingent upon handing ov .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

handing over of the relevant portion of land to the assessee. These facts support of the case of the revenue that there is no clarify as to whether the assessee is required to discharge the said liability or not. In the absence of clarity on this point, coupled with the fact that the assessee has not been handed over the relevant portion of land, we are of the view that the tax authorities are justified in disallowing the claim of provision for expenses made in the accounts of the assessee - Dec .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sion for Expenses". 2. The assessee is engaged in the business of building construction. It undertook a project of construction of a property at Morechiwadi, Opposite to Wadala Teephone Exchange, Dadar (East) under Slum Redevelopment Scheme. The project was sanctioned in the year 2004 and was completed in the year 2010 relevant to the assessment year under consideration. The assessee followed "Percentage completion method" for offering income from this project in the earlier years .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

id buildings at free of cost to M.C.G.M. As on 31.3.2010, the assessee had not constructed the above said built up area. However, since it is liable to construct the above said area and is required to hand over the same at free of cost to M.C.G.M and since it is part of the condition of sanction of the project approved by the Slum Rehabilitation Authority, the assessee provided for a sum of ₹ 1,22,10,000/- towards construction of the above said built up area and claimed the same as deducti .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the accounts. The assessee also submitted that the Accounting Standard 7 issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India mandates making of such provisions. 4. The AO noticed that the assessee is following mercantile system of accounting and it has offered income in the earlier years under percentage completion method. Further, the assessee appears to have taker different stand before the AO, i.e., at one stage, it has claimed that the project was completed 100% and later it was submi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

expenditure incurred by it against the provision made with relevant evidences. Accordingly, the AO did not agree with the claim of "Provision for expenses" and accordingly disallowed the claim of ₹ 1,22,10,000/-. 5. The Ld CIT(A) noticed that the land, where the construction of Municipal staff quarters and Road depot was to be undertaken, was not allotted to the assessee till date. Hence, the Ld CIT(A) took the view that the liability fasted upon the assessee in this regard was .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

heard rival contentions and perused the record. The Ld A.R submitted that the assessee has completed the project during the year under consideration and hence under "Revenue cost matching principle", all the expenses relating to the project have to be provided for. He submitted that the provision made by the assessee represents "provision of expenses towards uncompleted works" and hence the same should have been allowed by the tax authorities. The Ld A.R placed reliance on t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s justified in upholding the order of the AO. 8. We have heard rival contentions and perused the record. The dispute, as we understand, is whether the provision of ₹ 1.22 crores made by the assessee is towards an ascertained liability or towards a contingent liability. The assessee heavily places reliance on the terms and conditions of sanction of Slum Rehabilitation Scheme to show that it is liable to construct Municipal staff quarters & Road depot and hand over the same at free of co .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssee that it has not incurred any expenditure against the provision so made by it. Further, it was noticed that the liability to construct the buildings would accrue to the assessee only if the relevant portion of land was handed over to the assessee. The Ld CIT(A) has specifically noticed that the land was not handed over to the assessee till date and hence held that the liability claimed by the assessee is contingent upon handing over the land. Accordingly he has taken the view that the liabil .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version