Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. S. Jogani Exports Pvt. Ltd Versus Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax 5 (3) , Mumbai

MTM losses disallowed - loss in respect of cancellation of forward contracts disallowed being speculative in nature - treatment of forex losses or gains - Held that:- Assessee had recognized a loss of ₹ 2,13,43,725/- on forward foreign exchange contract of $83,45,000/- which were made in order to cover the loss due to fluctuation in exchange rate and were pending for maturity at the close of the year. At the same time the assessee also booked a gain of ₹ 4,48,05,788/- on the outstand .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ort and these days specially the exchange rate is highly volatile.

The special bench decision in case of DCIT Vs Bank of Bahrain and Kuwait (2010 (8) TMI 578 - ITAT, MUMBAI ) the special bench held that MTM losses in respect of forward foreign exchange contract debited to the profit and loss account are allowable and further held (i) a binding obligation is accrued against the assessee the moment it entered into forward foreign exchange contract(ii) consistent accounting method follo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

revenue effect and it is only timing of taxation of loss/profit.

Following the decision of apex court in the case of Woolward Governor India Pvt. Ltd (2009 (4) TMI 4 - SUPREME COURT ) and special bench decision in the case of Bank of Bahrain and Kuwait(supra) , we are of the considered view that case of the assessee is fully covered by the decisions of the coordinate note benches and we therefore respectfully following the same allow the appeal of the assessee on the issue of MTM loss .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nds of appeal: 1. The learned CI.T.(A) erred in upholding the addition made of ₹ 2,13,43,725/- by the learned AO on a mistaken fact that this amount represents loss in respect of cancellation of forward contracts and being speculative in nature is not allowable as per the provisions of Sec.43(5) whereas in reality, this loss is on restatement of outstanding forward contracts (marked to market) as at year end. He has totally misunderstood the facts and proceeded and decided the issue on a w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lusively due to forward contract against which no delivery was made. 3. The learned CI.T.(A), inspite of driving home specifically in writing on the subject, erred in not following various judicial pronouncements squarely on the issue relied upon by the appellant including that of the Hon. Supreme Court in the case of Woodward Governor(312 ITR 254) and of jurisdictional Mumbai ITAT Special Bench in the case of Bank of Baharain & Kuwait (2010) 5 ITR (Trib) 301, subsequently followed on identi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

R submitted that the ground no. 1 was only effective ground and pressed. The facts in brief are that the assessee filed its return of income on 30.09.2009 declaring an income of ₹ 2,37,29,127/-. The assessee was engaged in the business of trading, manufacturing and export of cut and polished diamond for which the assessee had to import the raw diamond. Case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny and statutory notices were issued u/s 143(2) and 142(1) of the Act and served upon the asses .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

gs noticed that the assessee had charged to the profit and loss account, a loss of ₹ 2,13,43,275/- on forward contract for sale re-stating the same at the exchange rate prevalent at the yearend which was not allowable under the Income Tax Act as being contingent and notional in nature on the analogy that the actual loss or profit would materialize only upon when the contract was performed. The ld AO relied upon the instruction no. 3 of 2010 which provided clarification in respect speculati .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y considered the facts and circumstances of the case. It is not disputed that the appellant had claimed in its return of income for assessment year 2008-09, a loss of ₹ 2,13,43,725/- on account of exchange rate fluctuation of outstanding debtors and creditors for sale and purchase of foreign currency considering the exchange rate as on 31.3.2009. It is also not disputed that the appellant has cancelled forward contracts in US dollar which were booked during the during accounting year relev .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

commercial consideration exigencies and / or changes in the forex market the appellant company had to cancel forward contracts which were booked during the accounting year relevant to assessment year 2009-10. 5.2.2 A perusal of the relevant details available before me indicates that the appellant had indeed entered into several forward contracts all of which were cancelled during the year. A forward contract is a an agreement between a buyer and seller wholly getting the seller to deliver a spe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ue to foreign exchange fluctuation. The appellant at the time of agreeing to export took into consideration its cost in rupees and also considered the spot price of rupee against foreign exchange. When the actual export is made, this spot price may be different as against' the spot price on the date on which the appellant expected an export order. On the date or receipt of foreign exchange, if the spot price of rupee against foreign exchange increases then the appellant will be benefited. Fo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

export. Alternatively, he can get the spot price on the date of accepting the export order as the sale price and the difference due to spot price on the date of settlement of forward contract may be credited as profit due to forward contract. However, during the course of assessment proceedings before the AO and during the course of appellate proceedings before me it is not disputed that loss shown is exclusively due to forward contracts against which no actual delivery of foreign exchange was .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

an by the actual delivery or transfer of the commodity or scrips. It is clear that a transaction is speculative in case the contract is periodical or ultimately settled otherwise than by actual delivery or transfer of the commodity. In the instant case, it has been admitted that the loss debited on account of forward contract is in respect contracts in which there has been no actual delivery. 5.2.4 The Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in the case of V. N. Sarsety V/s CIT(1987) 163 fTR 727 (Kar) .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ulative. In case a dispute arises and the amount is paid as a breach of, the -contract then the matter is to be considered differently. 5.2.5 In order that a transaction may fall within the scope of the expression speculative transaction' it must be a transaction in which a contract for purchase or sale of any commodity, including stocks and shares, periodically or ultimately settled otherwise than by the actual delivery or transfer of the commodity or scrips. What is important to be noticed .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ged by the contract, the promisee, in terms of s. 63 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, accepts instead of it, any satisfaction which he thinks fit and what is really settled by damages is the dispute between the parties' and, therefore, it is quite different from the settlement of the contract. A contract is settled when it is either performed or the promise dispenses with or remis, wholly or in part, the performance of the promose made to him or accepts instead of it any satisfaction which .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

/s CIT (1964) 52 ITR 171 (Cal) had an occasion to consider as to whether the intention to give delivery or not is material to ,decide the transaction as speculative when there is no actual delivery. The Hon'ble High Court held that the definition of speculative transaction as contained in the Act has restricted the meaning of the expression 'speculative transaction' and in a sense simplified it for the purposes of computation of income tax. When there is no delivery under a settlemen .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

) 133 ITR 85 (Mad) had an occasion to consider the meaning of 'speculation business'. In the case before the Hon‟ble High Court, the assessee was dealing in the business of groundnut oil.. The assessee entered into forward contract for supply of groundnut 0il. Forward contract was settled not by actual delivery but by payment of difference. Such loss was held to be loss of speculation business. 5.2.10 The Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of CIT Vs Puttaiah Seshaias .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

peculation loss. 5.2.11 Proviso, to s. 43(5) specifies certain categories of transactions which cannot be treated as speculative transaction. Exclusion is of transaction in respect of contract for actual delivery of goods manufactured or merchandise sold by him. In this case, contract is in respect of foreign exchange which is not goods manufactured by assessee. Hence, it cannot be said that transaction of settlement of foreign exchange contract settled without actual delivery can be covered und .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Court in the case of Sri Ranga Vilas Ginning and Oil Mills (supra) had an occasion to consider as to whether the ward contract for supply of groundnut oil which were settled not by actual delivery is to be considered as a speculation business in view of Expln. to s. 28." The Hon'ble Madras High Court held that if in a business, the assessee is doing regular business in spot dealings in commodity and also indulges in speculative transactions in the same commodity then speculative transac .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

have been taken by the appellant and cancelled. Thus, it is not an isolated transaction. Hence, in view of Expl No.2 to s.28, the profit from the forward contract will have to be assessed as profit from speculation business. 5.2.16 The LAO has relied on the provision of sub-section 5 of Section of 43 the Act and the provision of Section 73 r.w. Instruction NO.3 of 2010 dated 23.3.2010 issued by the CBDT in order to come to a considered conclusion that the disputed loss on account of cancellation .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

.4 (124)6060-TPL) wherein hedging transaction is connected though not the same, commodities not to be treated as speculative transactions provided other conditions of explanation 2 section 24 are satisfied. As per the answer to point No.3 of the CBDT‟s circular No.23 of 1960, it was clarified by the Board that only in the case of bonafide ready delivery contract having been settled by actual delivery the transactions need not be treated as speculative transactions. However in the present c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e asked is whether the liability is crystallized during the previous year. Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of CIT vs Kamani Metal Products Pvt Ltd (1994) 208 ITR 107 BOM has held that where the liability has not crystallized during the previous year, the loss was not allowable. Similar views have been held in the following decisions:- (i) CIT vs Indian Overseas Bank(1985) 151 ITR 446 (Mad) (ii) Indian Molasses Co.Ltd vs CIT (1959) 37 ITR 66 (SC) (iii) CIT vs Nainital Bank Ltd (1966) 62 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r dollar rates stood reduced, the department had taxed the gains and it was only in the year in question when the loss was not allowed. Whereas in the present case, the appellant itself has submitted that whenever 'mark to market' valuation results in loss the same is debited to Profit and Loss Account. However, if such valuation results in profit the same is ignored and not credited to the Profit and Loss Account. 5.2.19 I have also perused the decision relied upon by the LAR. These cas .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ot in respect of specified export or import orders. In the present case all contracts have been cancelled. Therefore the facts of the present case are clearly distinguishable from the facts mentioned in the case of CIT vs Badridas Gauridu Pvt Ltd(supra). The LAO has further distinguished the case of B Vijaykumar & Co. (ITN No.2510/Mum/2002) and facts of Kishorekumar & Co. vs DCIT in ITA No. 3883/Muml.97with the facts of the present case. As far as the LAR's reliance in the case of CI .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ppreciation of facts surrounding the transaction and by not mere application of a principle of law. Therefore the decision of Hon'ble Delhi High Court does not come to the rescue of the appellant. On the other hand there are various decisions as cited below which support the case of the revenue in this case. a) Shree Capital Services Ltd vs Acti (2009) 121 ITD 498; b) ACIT vs K Mohanan Export Pvt Ltd (2011) 7 ITR 507; c) Bengal & Assam Co.Ltd vs CIT(2009)227 CTR 399(Cal); and d) ACT vs A .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ecord does not apply to income-tax proceedings. The fact that in subsequent or earlier assessment year, the LAO has treated the speculation loss as business loss will not estoppel the LAO from giving a finding as to whether the loss arising on account of cancellation of forward exchange contracts without actual delivery was' speculation loss even if it is held otherwise in the subsequent assessment year. Strong reliance is placed on the following decisions:- a) Sir Kikabai Premchand vs CIT ( .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssee was covered in its favor by decisions of the Hon‟ble Supreme court, High court and Tribunals which the AO and CIT(A) failed to appreciate. The effective sole ground as argued by the ld AR was against the disallowance of marked to market loss of ₹ 2,13,43,725/- which has accrued from the revaluation and re-statement of outstanding forward contract at the end of the year as per accounting standard -11 based foreign exchange on the closing date or reporting date. The ld counsel sub .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ing at the end of the year. The ld counsel strongly placed reliance on the following decisions of Tribunal in which the decision of hon‟ble Supreme Court in the case of Woolward Governor India Pvt. Ltd(2009) 312 ITR 254 and Special Bench decision in the case of Bank of Bahrain and Kuwait (41SOT29) were followed:- a) Venus Jewel -ITA No.7328 and 7329/Mum/2013 dated 31.7.2015; b) Rikin Exports-ITA No.3757/Mum/2013 dated 24.6.2015; c) Raj Gems-ITA No.4486/Mum/2012 dated19.5.2015; d) Inter Jew .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

97,3595,8198/Mum/2005 dated 30.1.2013; m) Bhavani Gems -ITA No.2855/Mum/2010 dated 30.3.2011; n) H Dipak and Co-ITA No.7629/M/2011 dated 30.4.20; o) Kumbh Gems-ITA No.6600/M/2012 dated 2.1.2014; and p) Raj Gems-ITA No.4486/M/2012 dated 28.10.2013. 6. The ld DR on the other hand relied heavily on the orders of authority below. 7. We have considered the rival submissions and perused the materials on records and also after going through the decisions relied upon by the ld.AR find that assessee had .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lly realized but a likely gain if the value of receivables are realized at the yearend .The same practice was being followed in the earlier year and was also accepted by the Revenue. The need to hedge is a commercial expediency and necessity which is practically followed in all the business houses engaged in import/export and these days specially the exchange rate is highly volatile. The special bench decision in case of DCIT Vs Bank of Bahrain and Kuwait (2010)132 TTJ Mumbai (SB) 505 the specia .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

bligation on the date of balance sheet is determinable with reasonable certainty(iv) as per AS-11 when the transaction is not settled in the same accounting year as that in which it occurred , the exchange difference arises over more than one accounting period (v)in the ultimate analysis , there is no revenue effect and it is only timing of taxation of loss/profit. The Tribunal in the case of Venus Jewel (supra) has vide para 10 observed and held as under : 10. The issue arising in the present a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of Rikin Exports (supra) has vide para 6 held as under : 6. Having regard to the circumstances of the case and in the light of the decision cited (supra), we uphold the order passed by CIT(A) and dismiss the appeal filed by Revenue The Tribunal in the case of Inter Jewl Private Limited (supra) vide para 10 has observed and held as under : 10. We have carefully perused the order of Ld. CIT(A) and the decisions brought to our notice. In our considered opinion and the understanding of the facts we .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector reg.

Forum: transfer of shares

Forum: Input tax credit

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

Forum: GST return filing software online | Easy GST compliance management

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version