Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

The DDIT (IT) -2 (2) , Mumbai Versus M/s. Union Investment Luxembourg S.A. A/C Uniasia Pacific

2016 (4) TMI 707 - ITAT MUMBAI

Allowance of STCL on STT paid transactions to be set off against the STCG on non-STT paid transactions - Held that:- Following the aforesaid decision of the co-ordinate bench of this Tribunal in the case of First State Investments (Hong Kong) (2009 (7) TMI 908 - ITAT MUMBAI ), we hold that the set off as proposed by the assessee in the case on hand is to be allowed, and accordingly uphold the order of the Ld. CIT(A) in directing the Assessing Officer to permit the set off of the STCL (STT paid) .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

TT in respect of this transaction. Before us, Revenue has failed to controvert both the evidence placed before us and the finding of the Ld.CIT(A) in this regard. In this factual matrix of the case, we uphold the order of the Ld. CIT(A) on this issue in directing the Assessing Officer to tax this amount of ₹ 7,04,43,724/- @ 10%.- Decided against revenue - ITA No. 4656 /MUM/2013 - Dated:- 29-2-2016 - SHRI JASON P. BOAZ (AM) AND SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (JM) For The Appellant : Shri. Vikash Agarw .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

9, the assessee filed its return of income on 30/09/2008 declaring total income of ₹ 48,90,51,424/-. The case was selected for scrutiny. In the course of assessment proceedings the assessee was provided with copy of AIR and requested to reconcile the entries with the custodian trade report and the bank statements. The assessment was completed u/s 143(3) r.w.s.144C(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the Act ) vide order dt. 02/02/2011, wherein the assessee s income was determined at & .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

umbai. The Ld. CIT(A) allowed the assessee s appeal vide the impugned order dt. 28/03/2013. 3. Aggrieved by the order of the CIT(Appeals)-10, Mumbai dt. 28/03/2013 for Asst. year 2008-09, the revenue has preferred this appeal before the Tribunal raising the following grounds:- 1) "On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, whether the Ld. CIT(A) erred in allowing STCL (on STT paid transactions) to be set-off against the STCG. (on non- STT paid transactions), when the STCG .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssment order that STCG amounting to ₹ 7,04,43,724/- to be taxed @ 30%. 3). The appellant prays that the order of the CIT(A) on the above ground(s) be set aside and that of the Assessing Officer be restored. 4). The appellant craves leave to amend or alter any ground or add a new ground which may be necessary. 4. Ground at Sr. No. 3 and 4 being general in nature, no adjudication is called for thereon. 5. Grounds No. 1 5.1 In this ground, Revenue contends that the Ld.CIT(A) had erred in allo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he impugned order of the Ld. CIT(A) on this issue. It is submitted by the Ld.AR that the assessee has an option to set off its STT paid loss against non-STT paid income even though it has STT paid income available for set off. It was contended that the Ld. CIT(A) in allowing the assessee appeal on this issue correctly followed the decision of the co-ordinate bench of this Tribunal in the case of First State Investments (Hong Kong) vs. ADIT [(2010) 132 TTJ (Mum) 218] wherein on an identical issue .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Kong) vs. ADIT [(2010) 132 TTJ (Mum) 218)] wherein, it has been held at para 11 thereof that the set off as proposed by the assessee cannot be denied, which is extracted hereunder: - 11. In the present appeal, the controversy is still narrower inasmuch as the short-term capital loss which was set-off by the assessee against the short term capital gain, has been accepted and the net figure of short-term capital gain after set-off of short term capital loss continues to remain the same. The disput .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

year of the operation of this provision and cannot crop up in the later years. Here we are concerned with the set-off of short term capital loss from one or more transactions with the short term capital gain from one or more transactions spread over the year, both before and after the cut-off date. Effectively the question is about the setting off of short-term capital loss and such set off is governed by subsection (2) of section 70, which has been reproduced above. Primarily the use of word a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ital gain as the case may be, it is mandatory to determine short-term capital loss or short-term capital gain in respect of each of the 10 transactions. Then the employment, of the expression any other" capital asset in the later part of the sub-section for the purpose of set-off clearly indicates that the short-term capital loss from one transaction has to be considered disjointedly for set-off against the shortterm capital gain of any other transaction Further presume that in the above ex .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

acie there is cue in the language of the sub-section that the option is with the assessee and he will decide as to whether the short-term capital loss from the f irst transaction ought to be set off against the shortterm capital gain of the transaction No. 2 or 3 or 4 etc, as the case may be. Our view about the vesting of the discretion in assessee for the purposes of set-off of short- term capital loss against any short-term capital gain is fortified when the language of sub-section (3) of sect .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t the short-term capital gain of the pre-cut-off date, it would have clearly set out such intention in the language of sub-section (2) itself, as has been done in sub-section(3.) In the absence of an stipulation in this regard in stub-section (2), we are satisfied that the choice has been left over to the assessee in taking decision about the setting off of short-term capital loss from one transaction against any other shortterm capital gain, whether within or outside the cut-off date. If higher .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ng the aforesaid decision of the co-ordinate bench of this Tribunal in the case of First State Investments (Hong Kong)(supra), we hold that the set off as proposed by the assessee in the case on hand is to be allowed, and accordingly uphold the order of the Ld. CIT(A) in directing the Assessing Officer to permit the set off of the STCL (STT paid) against STCG (non STT paid). Consequently, ground no.1 of the revenue appeal is dismissed. 6. Ground No: 2 6.1 In this ground revenue contends that the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version