New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (10) TMI 2491 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD

2015 (10) TMI 2491 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD - TMI - Demand of duty on the goods transferred to their sister units/ own units by adopting assessable value under Rule 8 of the Valuation Rules, 2000 on CAS 4 certificate - Held that:- We find from the impugned order that Shri Yadagiri R. Avadhoot, Manager-cum-Authorised Signatory of the appellant Company, in his statement dated 24.02.2014 stated that they have cleared the goods to the independent buyers also they have transferred the goods on payment of d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to be remanded back to the adjudicating authority to decide afresh. At this stage, the learned Advocate submits that the part of the demand is after the amendment of Rule 8 of the Valuation Rules and therefore, they are liable to pay duty after the amendment. As we are remanding the matter to the adjudicating authority, he will consider the submission of the learned Advocate.

In view of the above discussions, we set-aside the impugned order. The matter is remanded to the adjudicating .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ri Alok Srivastava, Authorised Representative JUDGEMENT Per : Mr. P.K. Das; The applicant filed these applications for early hearing of the appeals. The learned Advocate submits that the issue involved in these appeals is covered by the decision of the Tribunal in the appellant s own case. Hence, the appeals are taken up for hearing upon the consent of the parties. 2. After hearing both the sides and on perusal of the records, we find that the appellants were engaged in the manufacture of Polyes .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

yers and therefore, the value would be determined on transaction value as held by the Larger Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Ispat Industries Limited vs. CCE, Raigad 2007 (209) ELT 185 (Tri. LB). The learned Advocate submits that, in the appellants own case, for the earlier period, the Tribunal vide Order No. A/11232/2015 dated 24.08.2015 allowed the appeal. 3. On the other hand, the learned Authorised Representative for the Revenue reiterates the findings of the adjudicating authority. He .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version