Contact us   Feedback   Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (4) TMI 1098 - CESTAT MUMBAI

2015 (4) TMI 1098 - CESTAT MUMBAI - 2016 (42) S.T.R. 382 (Tri. - Mumbai) - Rectification of mistake - Refund claim filed under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 read with Notification No. 5/2006-ST by the appellant but adjudicating authority considered the claim's as per the provisions of Notification No. 41/2007 - Service tax paid on input services received & used in relation to manufacture - Held that:- “that the appellant had filed the claim of refund under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules” be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the several decisions rendered by Tribunal & High Court - Application No. ST/ROM/693/12 In Appeal No. ST/166/10-Mum - Order No. M/4675/2015-WZB/SMB - Dated:- 7-4-2015 - SHRI ANIL CHOUDHARY, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) For the Petitioner : Shri B.K. Iyer, Supdt. (A.R.) For the Respondent : None ORDER PER: ANIL CHOUDHARY: The revenue have filed the present application for rectification of mistake in the final order dated 9/9/2011. The Ground for rectification is that the respondent-assessee had filed claim .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Notification No. 41/2007. The Revenue states that the order of this Tribunal is on a different issue, that is, since exporter is a manufacturer and exporter s final product is exempted, the refund claim has been rejected in the Order-in-Original. This issue has not been taken up for adjudication. The show-cause notice also states that limitation under Section 11B of Central Excise Act read with Notification No. 41/2007. There is no where any mention of Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. W .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The respondent-assessee had contended that without admitting that they are not covered by the provisions of Notification No. 41/2007-ST, they had said that the claim of refund may be considered under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules read with Notification No. 5/2006-CE. 3. From a perusal of the Order-in-Appeal I find that the Commissioner (Appeals) have also considered the liability of refund under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules and have disallowed the same holdin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version