Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Sri Ramkrishna Industries Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Hyderabad-III

2015 (6) TMI 1021 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Classification - Whether the furnace of the appellant is 'pusher type' or 'batch type' for determination of ACP (annual production capacity) for levying monthly liability - Report of the NISST was given to the assessee in advance. Assessee has not lead any rebuttal evidence in the form of any Chartered Engineer's Certificate - Primary authority has not only taken the report of the NISST, but also examined the annual production based on the declarations filed by the assessee itself and the claim .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the same has been concurred by the appellate Tribunal and on re-appreciation of the entire material on record, we do not find any legal infirmity or irregularity to interfere with the same. - Decided against the appellant - CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 4 OF 2005 - Dated:- 24-6-2015 - G. CHANDRAIAH AND CHALLA KODANDA RAM, JJ. For The Respondent : J. Satya Ram, SC JUDGMENT G. Chandraiah, J. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and Standing Counsel for the Central Excise for the State of Telang .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

er month. Again based on a revised declaration by the assessee dated 10-9-1997, the Commissioner determined the ACP as 3145 MT per annum and liability was imposed at ₹ 78,625/- per month. The case of the assessee is that their furnace was having a screw pusher mechanism by which material is charged and there is no contrived movement of the material by way of conveyor belt or chain in the furnace of the assessee's factory and hence the furnace of the assessee has to be treated only as & .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Engineer's Certificate for redetermination of duty liability. Based on the report of the Range Superintendent dated 19-5-1998, the Commissioner, by order dated 27-10-1998, rejected the claim of the assessee and ordered to treat the furnace of the assessee as 'pusher type' and duty liability as determined in order dated 16-9-1997 was confirmed. Aggrieved by the same, the assessee filed appeal before the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, South Regional Bench Madras .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in-Original No. CEX-29/98, dated 27-10-1998 passed by the Commissioner and remitted the matter back for de novo consideration after giving opportunity to the assessee. The Commissioner was given liberty to cause re-verification/re-inspection of the furnace of the assessee by any technical authority to enable him to apply the aforementioned two tests in the matter and was directed to make available the result of the technical authority to the assessee before considering the matter on de novo basi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f NISST dated 8-11- 1999, the Commissioner concluded that the furnace of the assessee is 'pusher type' and rejected by the claim of the assessee by Order (Original) No. C. Ex. 06/2000 dated 10-2-2000. Challenging the same, the assessee filed appeal on the file of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench at Bengaluru. By the impugned order dated 23-8-2004, the appeal was dismissed. Aggrieved by the same, the present appeal by the assessee. 3. The learned couns .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ial is charged and there is no contrived movement of the material by way of conveyor belt or chain in the furnace of the appellant's factory and hence the furnace of the appellant has to be treated as batch type only and accordingly the unit's ACP has to be determined for imposing monthly duty liability. In other words, he contended that in order to treat a furnace as pusher type, there shall be a mechanism installed inside the furnace for the purpose of automatic operations and whereas .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

installed in the factory and if the mill is slow speed mill, then the furnace cannot be held to be having pusher type furnace as the same cannot be installed for a low speed mill. He stated that the mill of the assessee is low speed mill and this factor has not been taken into consideration by the NISST team. He submitted that the authorities without considering these aspects found that the assessee is having furnace with pusher type mechanism, thereby treating it as high speed mill and fixed h .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

1. Whether the order dated 23-8-2004 passed by the Hon'ble CESTAT upholding respondent order bearing No. CS.06/2000, dated 10-2-2000 determining the duty liability of the appellant under Hot Re-rolling Steel Mills Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997, is proper and correct? 2. Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case the finding of the Hon'ble CESTAT that the furnace installed in the appellant's factory is pusher type furnace (continuous) is proper and correct? 6. From .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

NISST. The conclusions in the said certificate, which are based on technical observations, are extracted as under for better appreciation : 1. The observation No. 12 clearly indicates that there is a pusher mechanism by which the material is charged/fed into the furnace. 2. The observation Nos. 3, 4 and 5 clearly indicate that there is movement of the material inside the furnace while the material is getting heated for rolling from back end of furnace to the front side door towards burner end ( .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Further from the material on record, it could be seen that the primary authority has not only taken the report of the NISST, but also examined the annual production based on the declarations filed by the assessee itself and the claim of the assessee with regard to the nature of mill being run by it. The relevant discussions of the lower authority, which is apposite to meet the contentions of the learned counsel for the appellant, are extracted as under : 28. Average production for last five yea .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the material as well as the movement of hot material inside the furnace and no automatic mechanism to take out the material from the furnace and also states that their furnace is not continuous furnace where an uninterrupted cycle in which the charged material is added constantly. But the assessee does not dispute the observations points Nos. 3, 4 and 5 made by the NISST in their technical report which clearly indicate that there is movement of material inside the furnace while the material is .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ch are box/batch type. But it is a general statement and nowhere it is mentioned that Sri R.P. Bhatia has physically inspected the mill of the assessee to declare their furnace is of batch type. And also the enclosure to Sri R.P. Bhatia's letter is irrelevant in the instant case since we are not entering into any debate also where by installing such pusher mechanism the production output of furnace could be doubled as envisaged in the formula of capacity assessment but we have to decide the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version