Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai Versus M/s. Ramaniyam Homes P. Ltd. (formerly known as Rasi Silk Industries Limited)

Waiver of loan amount - Scope of section 28(iv) - Principal loan amount waived by the bank under the one time settlement scheme - eligibility or non eligibility to tax - whether the waiver of principal amount would constitute income falling under Section 28(iv) of the Income Tax Act being the benefit arising for the business? - Held that:- What is treated as income chargeable to income tax under the head 'profits and gains of business or profession' under Section 28(iv), is "the value of any ben .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hich has a monetary value. If the holder of the voucher is entitled to transfer it to someone else for a monetary consideration, it becomes a perquisite convertible into money. But, irrespective of whether it is convertible into money or not, it should have a monetary value so as to attract Section 28(iv). A monetary transaction, in the true sense of the term, can also have a value. Any number of instances where a monetary transaction confers a benefit or perquisite that would have a value, can .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of waiver of a part of the loan. Therefore, the finding recorded in paragraph 27.1 of the decision in Iskraemeco Regent Limited [2010 (11) TMI 43 - Madras High Court ] that Section 28(iv) has no application to any transaction, which involves money, is a sweeping statement and may not stand in the light of the express language of Section 28(iv). In our considered view, the waiver of a portion of the loan would certainly tantamount to the value of a benefit. This benefit may not arise from "the b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

stalments, the instalment is divided into two components, one relating to interest and another relating to a portion of the principal. To the extent of the principal repaid, the liability as reflected in the balance sheet gets reduced. The interest paid on the principal amount of loan, will be allowed as deduction, in computing the income under the head "profits and gains of business or profession", as per the provisions of the Act. - But, Section 36(1)(iii) makes a distinction. The amount o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cquisition of the asset, till the date on which such asset was put to use, shall not be allowed as deduction. - Therefore, it is clear that the moment the asset is put to use, then the interest paid in respect of the capital borrowed for acquiring the asset, could be allowed as deduction. When the loan amount borrowed for acquiring an asset gets wiped off by repayment, two entries are made in the books of account, one in the profit and loss account where payments are entered and another in t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

uced and the amount shown as Capital Reserves, is increased to the extent of waiver. Alternatively, the amount representing the waived portion of the loan is shown as a capital receipt in the profit and loss account itself. - Decided in favour of revenue - Tax Case (Appeal) No. 278 of 2014 - Dated:- 22-4-2016 - V. Ramasubramanian And T. Mathivanan, JJ. For the Appellant : Mr. T. Ravikumar, Senior Standing Counsel - IT For the Respondent : Mrs. Dr. Anita Sumanth JUDGMENT V. Ramasubramanian, J. Th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ther on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ought to have seen that the waiver of principal amount would constitute income falling under Section 28(iv) of the Income Tax Act being the benefit arising for the business?" 2. Heard Mr.T.Ravikumar, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the Revenue and Mrs.Dr.Anita Sumanth, learned counsel for the respondent/assessee. 3. The assessee filed a Return of income for the assessment year 2006-07 on .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

paid only a sum of ₹ 93,89,000/-. 5. The Assessing Officer was of the view that since the assessee accepted the One Time Settlement Scheme, they should have shown the entire interest waived by the bank as income under Section 41(1) on accrual basis during the relevant assessment year. The Assessing Officer found that the total amount waived was ₹ 10.50 Crores and that as per the assessees accounts, the total interest and principal waived worked out to ₹ 9,29,32,594/-, which lef .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f ₹ 10.50 Crores by 30.4.2006, they paid an amount of ₹ 17.21 lakhs only. Therefore, the One Time Settlement sanctioned, lapsed. However, in the financial year 2006-07 (Assessment Year 2007-08), the appellant complied with the terms of One Time Settlement and obtained a No Due Certificate from the bank. Under such circumstances, the First Appellate Authority held that the merer acceptance of the conditional offer of the Indian Bank under the One Time Settlement Scheme, without comply .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he bank as on 31.3.2006. Thereafter, the first Appellate Authority held that it was wrong on the part of the Assessing Officer to conclude that the payment of ₹ 93,89,844/- was just a book entry. The first Appellate Authority concluded that it was evident from the records that the appellant actually paid ₹ 1,20,26,254/- during the financial year 2005-06. 8. On the issue of addition of ₹ 4,79,45,628/- under Section 28(iv), the first Appellate Authority followed a decision of thi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Officer for a fresh consideration. There is no appeal either by the assessee or by the Revenue, on the order of remand relating to the said issue. 10. On the only remaining issue namely the deletion of the principal portion of the term loan waived by the bank, the Tribunal held in para 12 of its order that the term loan had admittedly been used by the assessee for acquiring capital assets. Therefore, the Tribunal followed the decision of this Court in Iskraemeco Regent Limited and confirmed the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dertaking, they approached the BIFR. Under a Scheme of Rehabilitation sanctioned by the BIFR, a one time settlement was arrived at between the assessee and the Bank. The assessee credited the waiver of principal amount to the capital reserve account in the balance sheet treating it as capital in nature. But, the Assessing Officer treated the amount as income under Section 28(iv) read with Section 2(24). The assessee's appeal was dismissed by the Commissioner, following the judgment of the Su .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

transactions and that therefore, it cannot be termed as income taxable as a receipt. 13. However, drawing our attention to the definition of the expressions "income" and "total income" under Sub-sections (24) and (45) of Section 2 and the provisions of the charging Section 4 as well as the relevant provisions of Sections 28(iv), 41(1) and 59, it is contended by Mr.T.Ravikumar, learned Standing Counsel for the Department that the principal amount of loan waived by the Bank un .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

far as the decision of this Court in Iskraemeco Regent Limited, on the basis of which the Commissioner (Appeals) as well as the Tribunal decided the dispute in favour of the assessee is concerned, it is submitted by Mr.T.Ravikumar, learned Standing Counsel for the Department that the Supreme Court has already granted leave to the Department and the decision of this Court is the subject matter of Civil Appeal No.5751 of 2011 on the file of the Supreme Court. Therefore, the learned Standing Counse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

be of relevance for the case on hand, are as follows: (a) any sum chargeable to income tax under Clauses (ii) and (iii) of Section 28 or Section 41 or Section 59; (b) any sum chargeable to income tax under Clause (iiia) of Section 28; (c) any sum chargeable to income tax under Clause (iiib) of Section 28; (d) any sum chargeable to income tax under Clause (iiic) of Section 28; and (e) any sum chargeable to income tax under Clause (iv) of Section 28. 19. The expression "total income" is .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

g such year. 20. Under Section 4(1), income tax shall be charged in respect of the total income of the previous year of every person. It must be noted at this stage that while the expression "total income" is defined in Section 2(45) to mean what is referred to in Section 5, the expression "income" is defined in Section 2(24) to include the list of things provided in various clauses. In other words, the definition of the expression "income" is inclusive. 21. Keeping .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

liability. Section 41(1) requires to be extracted and hence, it is extracted as follows: "Section 41: (1) Where an allowance or deduction has been made in the assessment for any year in respect of loss, expenditure or trading liability incurred by the assessee (hereinafter referred to as the first-mentioned person) and subsequently during any previous year (a) the first-mentioned person has obtained, whether in cash or in any other manner whatsoever, any amount in respect of such loss or ex .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed, whether in cash or in any other manner whatsoever, any amount in respect of which loss or expenditure was incurred by the first-mentioned person or some benefit in respect of the trading liability referred to in clause (a) by way of remission or cessation thereof, the amount obtained by the successor in business or the value of benefit accruing to the successor in business shall be deemed to be profits and gains of the business or profession, and accordingly chargeable to income-tax as the i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

urposes of this sub-section, "successor in business" means (i) where there has been an amalgamation of a company with another company, the amalgamated company; (ii) where the first-mentioned person is succeeded by any other person in that business or profession, the other person; (iii) where a firm carrying on a business or profession is succeeded by another firm, the other firm; (iv) where there has been a demerger, the resulting company." 23. Keeping in mind the statutory provis .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

se amounts represented surplus that had arisen as a result of trade transactions and that therefore, the amounts had the character of income. Therefore, the Assessing Officer added these amounts as the income of the assessee for the purpose of assessment. The Commissioner (Appeals) deleted these additions and the same was upheld by the Tribunal. On an application under Section 256(2) to the High Court, the High Court held that the issue was already covered by the decision of the High Court in C. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

haracter will not change merely by lapse of time and even when the amount was taken to the profit and loss account of the assessee. The reasoning behind the second view was that the origin of the amount may be the business activity of the assessee, but every receipt need not be an income. 25. The question that was actually taken up for consideration by the Supreme Court in T.V.Sundaram Iyengar & Sons was as to whether the deposits, which were of capital nature, at the point of receipt by the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t noted that this test laid down by Lord Greene formed the basis of several judgments delivered by our courts. 26. After taking note of the principle of law laid down by Lord Greene, the Supreme Court considered a few decisions of different High Courts as well as the Supreme Court, where the Courts distinguished the decision in Morley. Thereafter, the Supreme Court pointed out that the amounts in question were not in the nature of security deposits held by the assessee for the performance of con .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

said opinion, the Supreme Court held that the assessee became richer, by the amount, which it transferred to its profit and loss account and that those monies had arisen out of ordinary trading transactions. The Supreme Court observed that although the amounts received originally were not of income nature, the amounts remained with the assessee for a long period unclaimed by the trade parties and that by lapse of time, the claim became time barred and attained a different quality. In the third .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e amount should be treated as income of the assessee." 28. In Solid Containers Limited Vs. D.C.I.T. [308 ITR 417], a Bench of the Bombay High Court was concerned with a case, in which, a loan obtained by the assessee during the previous year for business purposes was written back as a result of the consent terms between the parties. The assessee claimed that the loan was the capital receipt and was not claimed as deduction from the taxable income as expenses and hence, it did not come under .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sactions, Section 28(iv) was not attracted. But, the Bombay High Court followed the decision in T.V.Sundaram Iyengar & Sons and rejected the claim of the assessee. 29. In Logitronics, the Delhi High Court was concerned with the very same questions that we are called upon to deal with in this case. In the case before the Delhi High Court, the assessee availed a loan from the State Bank of India, but failed to discharge its liability. The loan was categorized as a non performing asset and proc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f the expression 'income' under Section 2(24) and held that the principal amount of loan written off was nothing but gain/income in the hands of the assessee by relying upon Section 28(iv) and 41(1). The assessee's first appeal was allowed by the Commissioner, but his order was reversed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, forcing the assessee to file a tax case appeal before the High Court of Delhi. 30. In Logitronics, two substantial questions of law were taken up for consideratio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ct of changing the nature and character of loan, a capital receipt into a trading receipt and therefore, the ratio of the judgment of the Honourable Supreme Court in CIT Vs. T.V. Sundaram Iyengar & Sons Limited [(1996) 222 ITR 344], wherein unclaimed deposits received in the course of trading transaction were held to be taxable is applicable to waiver of loan?" 31. Before proceeding with the discussion on the substantial questions of law, the Delhi High Court took note of the broad sche .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ram Iyengar & Sons and after analysing the same in great detail, the Delhi High Court took note of the decision of this Court in Iskraemeco Regent Limited, on which, heavy reliance is placed in this case by the assessee. 33. On the basis its analysis of the decision of this Court in Iskraemeco Regent Limited, the Delhi High Court came to the conclusion in paragraph 23 of the report that 'in the context of waiver of loan amount, what follows from the reading of the aforesaid judgment woul .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

where in terms of a corporate debt restructuring package worked out between the assessee and the bank, a portion of the principal and interest were waived. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the waiver of the working capital loan utilised towards the day-to-day business operations resulted in manifest in the revenue field and hence, was taxable in the year of waiver. 35. Finding on facts that the term loans in question were taken for the purchase of capital assets from time to time and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eof may result in the income, more so when it is transferred to the profit and loss account. 37. But, the Delhi High Court, both in Logitronics as well as in Rollatainers, did not take note of one fallacy in the reasoning given in paragraph 27.1 of the decision of this Court in Iskraemeco Regent Limited. In paragraph 27.1 of the decision in Iskraemeco Regent Limited, this Court held that Section 28(iv) speaks only about a benefit or perquisite received in kind and that therefore, it would have n .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ss or profession' under Section 28(iv), is "the value of any benefit or perquisite, whether convertible into money or not, arising from business or the exercise of a profession." 39. Therefore, it is not the actual receipt of money, but the receipt of a benefit or perquisite, which has a monetary value, whether such benefit or perquisite is convertible into money or not, which is what is covered by Section 28(iv). Say for instance, a gift voucher is issued, enabling the holder of t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y transaction confers a benefit or perquisite that would have a value, can be conceived of. There may be cases where an incentive is granted by the supplier, waiving a portion of the sale price or granting a rebate or discount of a portion of the price to be paid, when the payments scheduled over a period of time, are made promptly. It is needless to point out that in such cases, the prompt payment of money itself brings forth a benefit in the form of an incentive or a rebate or a discount in th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s benefit may not arise from "the business" of the assessee. But, it certainly arises from "business". The absence of the prefix "the" to the word "business"makes a world of difference. 40. We shall now turn our attention to the distinction sought to be made between the waiver of a portion of the loan taken for the purpose of acquiring capital assets on the one hand and the the waiver of a portion of the loan taken for the purpose of trading activities on .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the extent of the principal repaid, the liability as reflected in the balance sheet gets reduced. The interest paid on the principal amount of loan, will be allowed as deduction, in computing the income under the head "profits and gains of business or profession", as per the provisions of the Act. 42. But, Section 36(1)(iii) makes a distinction. The amount of interest paid in respect of capital borrowed for the purpose of business or profession is allowed as deduction under Section 36( .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: GST return filing software online | Easy GST compliance management

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Input tax credit

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

Forum: GST on Notional rent

Forum: GST ON SALES PROMOTION

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?

Notification: TDS liability under Section 51 of CGST, 2017 come into force w.e.f. 18-9-2017 - Persons liable to deduct TDS from payment made or credited to the supplier of taxable goods or services specified

Notification: Central Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2017

Notification: Seeks to extend the last date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August to December, 2017

Circular: Filing of Special Leave Petition against Orders of Hon'ble High Courts staying Collection of Tax under GST- reg.

Highlight: Exemption u/s 54F - LTCCG - once entire net consideration is invested, the absence of completion certificate cannot be a ground to deny the benefit of deduction.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version