Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai-II, Toll (India) Logistics Pvt. Ltd. Versus Toll (India) Logistics Pvt. Ltd., Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai-II

2016 (4) TMI 982 - CESTAT MUMBAI

Includability - Whether reimbursable expenses to be included in the gross value - Handling operations of regional mother warehouse - Held that:- the issue is no more res-integra. By referring to the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Intercontinental Consultants & Technocrats Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India [2012 (12) TMI 150 - DELHI HIGH COURT], reimbursable expenses cannot be added to the value for discharge of services tax. - Decided in favour of assessee - Appeal .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

penalties while the assessee is aggrieved by the order on the ground that the first appellate authority has not considered that reimbursable expenses cannot be included in the gross value for discharge of service tax. 3. The appellant assessee is a clearing and forwarding agent for Ms. M/s. Amway India Enterprises handling operations of regional mother warehouse for which, as per contract, the appellant assessee receives fix monthly remuneration, variable charges, kit, assembly charges, sticker .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Forwarding Services, hence services tax liability arises. 4. We find, that there is no dispute that the amounts on which service tax liability is confirmed are nothing but reimbursable expenses. The issue is no more res-integra as Hon'ble High Court of Madras in the case of Commissioner of service tax Chennai vs. Sangamitra agency 2014 (33) S.T.R. 137 (Mad.) held as under: "4. It is seen from the documents placed before this Court that the show cause notice pointed out that the various .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

red by the assessee and reimbursed to them by their principals for the service of clearing and forwarding of excisable goods, the same could not enter into the taxable value under Rule 6(8) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 read with 67 of the Finance Act, 1994. The assessee further contended that the inclusion of such reimbursed expenditure was bad in law. 5. In accepting the case of the respondent/assessee, the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal referred to the decision rendered b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Rule 6(8) of Service Tax Rules, 1994, the value of taxable service in relation to the services provided by the Clearing and Forwarding Agent to the client for rendering services of Clearing and Forwarding operations, in any manner, shall be deemed to be the gross amount of remuneration or commission (by whatever name called) paid to such agent by the client, engaging such agent. He further submitted that considering the charges collected towards freight, labour, electricity, telephone etc., in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version