Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s D.D. International Pvt. Ltd. Versus CST, Delhi

2016 (4) TMI 1079 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

Waiver of pre-deposit - Violation of the provisions of Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944 - Appellant neither filed stay application nor made pre-deposit - Demand alongwith interest and penalty confirmed on the ground that the appellant was not .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

thin 15 days of the completion of the said six months which is only a procedural requirement. Therefore the benefit of notification should not have been denied.

Held that:- it is evident that the said condition is a condition of exemption .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tís appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals). Therefore, prima facie, we do not find any infirmity in the impugned order and accordingly we order pre-deposit of entire impugned service tax liability along with interest within four weeks. - Waiver not .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Khanna, D.R. ORDER PER R.K. SINGH: Stay application along with appeal has been filed against order-in-appeal dated 30.7.2013 which rejected the appellants appeal against order-in-original dated 29.6.2012 not only on merits but also for violation of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

7; 11,80,057/- along with interest and penalty on the ground that the appellant was not eligible for the benefit of exemption Notification No. 18/2009-ST dated 7.7.2009. 2. The appellant has contended that it satisfied all the conditions of Notificat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

denied. 3. We have considered the contentions of the appellant. We find that condition (c) contained in the proviso to the Notification No. 18/2009 reads as under :- (c) the exporter availing the exemption shall file the return in Form EXP-2 every s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version