Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Centre For Development Of Imaging Technology (C-DIT) Versus Commissioner Of Central Excise And Customs

2015 (6) TMI 1022 - KERALA HIGH COURT

Waiver of pre-deposit - Issue of limitation - No finding on the issue of limitation raised by the appellant and it was without dealing with that contention that the appellant was ordered to deposit ₹ 1 crore by the Tribunal - Held that:- the or .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

elevance in so far as this 35 crores is concerned. Therefore, appellant is directed to deposit ₹ 35 lakhs within four weeks from today and report compliance before the Tribunal. Subject to deposit, pre deposit of the balance due under the order .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ash, Adv. For the Respondent : Shri Thomas Mathew Nellimoottil, SC JUDGMENT ANTONY DOMINIC, J. Heard the counsel for the appellant and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent. 2. In this appeal, stay order dated 23.3.2015 passed by .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

iod 2006-07 to 2010-2011. In the appeal that was filed before the Tribunal, an application for waiver of pre-deposit and stay was filed. On that application, Tribunal passed order dated 19.8.2013 requiring the appellant to deposit an amount of ₹ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rt. By judgment dated 5.11.2013, that appeal was disposed of setting aside this order. In deference to the judgment of this Court, the Tribunal restored the appeal to file, heard the application afresh and passed the impugned order in which the Tribu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

that the order dated 19.8.2013 was interfered with, primarily for the reason that there was no finding on the issue of limitation raised by the appellant and it was without dealing with that contention that the appellant was ordered to deposit ͅ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hat despite a positive direction by this Court the issue of limitation was not considered. This, therefore, means that the order dated 23.3.2015 passed by the Tribunal is not one in compliance with the binding directions of this Court. For that reaso .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version