Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Super Multicolor Printers Pvt. Ltd., UT, Chandigarh Versus Union Territory, Chandigarh and another

Validity of assessment order - No opportunity of personal order granted - finalized ex-parte by creating additional demand - Held that:- A Division Bench of this Court on M/s Olam Agro India Ltd's case [2015 (8) TMI 823 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA] had held that Rule 86 of the Rules does not envisage service of a general notice or by publication on the website of the department. It was further held that the service of an individual notice is a sine qua non for invoking power and the absen .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

re, Annexure P-2 is quashed in both the writ petitions. - Petition disposed of - CWP No. 16031 of 2015 - Dated:- 1-3-2016 - MR. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL AND MRS. RAJ RAHUL GARG., JJ. For The Petitioner : Mr. Sandeep Goyal, Advocate For The Respondent : Mr. Vikas Cuccria, Advocate, Mr. Vikram Sharda, Advocate AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. 1. This order shall dispose of two petitions bearing CWP Nos. 16031 and 26000 of 2015 as according to learned counsel for the parties, the questions of law and facts involved .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ent order dated 17.11.2014 (Annexure P-2) whereby tax had been levied upon the petitioner(s) for the assessment year 2007-08 even though the assessment had already become barred by limitation in view of Section 29(4) of the Act as applicable to UT, Chandigarh on 20.11.2011 and for issuance of a writ of mandamus restraining the respondents from enforcing the payment of tax on the basis of demand notice issued in Form No. VAT-56. 2. A few facts necessary for adjudication of the writ petitions as n .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

petitioner had filed its return for the year 2007-08 on quarterly basis in Form VAT-15. On the basis thereof, statement showing a gross turnover of Rs. 13,13,83,980/- was also filed. As per Section 29(4) of the Act, the assessment of the dealer could have been framed only within a period of three years from the last date of filing of the annual statement. Since, in the present case, the annual statement in Form VAT-20 was filed on 20.11.2008 for the assessment year 2007- 08, the assessment, if a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sioner grants any extension of period for framing assessment, then it is imperative on the part of the department to provide an opportunity of hearing before granting any such extension. In the present case, no opportunity of hearing was granted to the petitioner and the assessment was finalized exparte vide order dated 17.11.2014 (Annexure P-2) by creating an additional demand. Similar order passed by the Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Punjab extending the period of limitation had been set a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version