Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

ACIT, Circle-1 (1) , Vijayawada Versus Thatavarthi Chandrasekhara Rao

2016 (5) TMI 14 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM

Inclusion of Agricultural lands for the purpose of wealth tax - A.O. was of the opinion that though, the lands are agricultural lands, they are situated within the 8 kms. from the local limits of the municipality, therefore, liable for wealth tax - contention of the assessee that the lands are classified as agricultural lands and also used for agricultural purpose as per the revenue records of the Government - Held that:- We find force in the arguments of the assessee for the reason that the Fin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t these lands are agricultural lands. The only contention of the A.O. is that these lands are situated within 8 kms. from the local limits of municipality. As per the amended definition of urban land, the distance from the municipality is not a criteria to determine whether the lands are assets or not. Once the lands are classified as agricultural lands, in the revenue records of Government and used for agricultural purpose, then the same are outside the purview of the definition of assets as pe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

#8377; 14,01,000/-, the sub registrar, at the time of registration of the property has collected additional stamp duty and penalty. The sale deed copy was available in the local language of Tamil. Though, English translation copy is available in the file, the details are not clear from the sale deed that whether the market value of the property is at ₹ 14,01,000/- or not. The assessee contends that the market value of the property is at ₹ 14,01,000/-. But, the fact remains that at th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t ₹ 14,01,000/- then the same should be adopted for the purpose of determination of taxable wealth. - Decided in favour of revenue for statistical purposes. - W.T.A.No.2/Vizag/2014 - Dated:- 18-3-2016 - SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER For The Appellant : Shri M.N. Murthy Naik, DR For The Respondent : Shri C. Subrahmanyam, AR ORDER PER G. MANJUNATHA, Accountant Member: This appeal filed by the revenue is directed against the order of CIT(A), Vija .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lth Tax Act is issued calling for return of wealth. The A.O. after considering the relevant information has completed the assessment under Wealth Tax Act and determined the net wealth of ₹ 91,06,951/-. 3. During the course of wealth tax assessment proceedings, the A.O. noticed that the assessee has claimed exemption from wealth tax for two agricultural lands situated at Gollapudi and Ibrahimpatnam. On verification of the details filed by the assessee, the A.O. noticed that the lands are si .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as per the amended provisions of section 2(ea) by the Finance Act, 2013 with retrospective effect from 1.4.1993, any lands classified as agricultural lands in the records of the Government and used for agricultural purposes is not a capital asset within the meaning of section 2(ea) of the Act. 4. Similarly, the Assessing Officer noticed that the assessee owned a residential house property at Tottipalayam, which was valued at ₹ 14,01,000/- for the purpose of wealth tax. To ascertain the co .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of ₹ 39,25,158/- determined, based on the values of sub registrar shall not be adopted for the purpose of wealth tax. In response to show cause notice, the assessee submitted that the value determined by the Inspector of Income Tax, based on the sub registrar value is not correct, as subsequently he has sold the property and as per the registered sale deed, the property is sold for a consideration of ₹ 14,01,000/-, therefore requested to adopt the value as per the sale deed. 5. The .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

regard to property at Tirupur, the Assessing Officer held that the property valued based on the values of sub registrar office is the correct market value of the property. Therefore, adopted the value determined based on the values of sub registrar office and brought to wealth tax. 6. Aggrieved by the assessment order, the assessee preferred an appeal before the CIT(A). Before the CIT(A), the assessee reiterated the submissions made before the A.O. The assessee further submitted that as regards .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

used for agricultural purposes is not a asset within the meaning of section 2(ea) of the Act. Similarly, the assessee submitted that as regards the house property at Tottipalayam, Tirupur, the property was sold for a consideration of ₹ 14,01,000/- on 27.3.2007. Therefore, the value of the property for the previous financial year cannot be more than the market value in the subsequent year. Therefore, the A.O. was erred in adopting the value based on the sub registrar value, ignoring the sa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t liable for wealth tax. Similarly, as regards the property at Tottipalayam, Tirupur, the value of property in the previous period cannot be more than the value on the later date. The CIT(A), further, held that when assessee furnished a document evidencing the market value of the property at ₹ 14,01,000/- in the subsequent financial year, the value of the same property cannot be ₹ 39,25,158/- in the previous financial year. Therefore, directed the A.O. to adopt the value of ₹ 1 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

urn which also evidenced that the land was not used for agricultural purpose and hence, the land situated at Gollapudi and Ibrahimpatnam are urban lands within the meaning of section 2(ea) of the W.T. Act. 9. On the other hand, the Ld. A.R. of the assessee submitted that the lands are agricultural lands and used for agricultural purposes as per the revenue records of the Government, therefore as per the amended provisions of section 2(ea)(v) of the Act, with retrospective effect from 1.4.1993, a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e opinion that though, the lands are agricultural lands, they are situated within the 8 kms. from the local limits of the municipality, therefore, liable for wealth tax. It was the contention of the assessee that the lands are classified as agricultural lands and also used for agricultural purpose as per the revenue records of the Government. We find force in the arguments of the assessee for the reason that the Finance Act, 2013, with retrospective effect from 1.4.1993, has amended the definiti .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

se lands are situated within 8 kms. from the local limits of municipality. As per the amended definition of urban land, the distance from the municipality is not a criteria to determine whether the lands are assets or not. Once the lands are classified as agricultural lands, in the revenue records of Government and used for agricultural purpose, then the same are outside the purview of the definition of assets as per section 2(ea) of the Act. The CIT(A) after considering the explanations furnish .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version