Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. Petrochem Middle East India Pvt. Ltd., Dy. CIT-8 (2) , Mumbai Versus Dy. CIT-8 (2) , Mumbai, M/s. Petrochem Middle East India Pvt. Ltd.

Addition on account of undervaluation of equity shares considered as deemed loan and interest computed thereon - Held that:- The issue stands covered in favour of the assessee by the judgment of the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court, delivered in the case of Vodafone India Services Pvt. Ltd. (2014 (11) TMI 881 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT ) held that the issue of shares at a premium by the petitioners to its non -resident holding company does not give rise to any international transaction, that in such a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

chosen by the assessee was more appropriate than the date adopted by the TPO. The DRP itself had held that nearest CUP data should be considered. In the case under consideration the assessee had adopted the data of 30th January which was the nearest date for the transaction in question. Therefore, in our opinion adjustment made by the TPO was not proper.- Decided in favour of assessee - I. T. A. /2255/Mum/2014, I. T. A. /2070/Mum/2014 - Dated:- 27-4-2016 - Sh. Rajendra, Accountant Member And C. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y, engaged in the business of trading of petrochemicals, filed its return of income, declaring income of ₹ 37. 20 crores. The AO completed the assessment, on 28. 02. 2001, u/s. 143(3)r. w. s. 144C(13)of the Act, determining the income of the assessee at ₹ 2, 09, 15, 37, 490/-. 2. First ground of appeal is about addition made on account of undervaluation of equity shares considered as deemed loan and interest computed thereon. At the time of hearing before us, representatives of both .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rise. Respectfully, following the above judgment of the Hon ble Bombay High Court, we decide Ground no. 1 in favour of the assessee. 3. Second ground of appeal as about addition made on account of rejection of Comparable Uncontrolled Price(CUP)in respect of the international transactions entered in to by the assessee with its Associated Enterprises(AEs). During the assessment proceedings, the AO made a reference to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO)to determine the Arm s Length Price(ALP)of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ad used the date of the place from where the goods were imported, that it had entered in to 245 international transactions. Out of the total transactions, the TPO accepted the ALP of 238 cases. For remaining seven transactions, he made adjustments. After receiving the order of the TPO, the AO issued a draft order to the assessee. It filed objections before the DRP for each transactions. The DRP deleted the addition in respect of one transaction. However, adjustment made by the TPO for the remain .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

at on that date rate of Sovesso100 was ₹ 27. 54 per kg, that the transaction was not at arm s length. The DRP held that beyond the nearness of date the assessee had not mentioned as to how the transaction was otherewise comparable in terms of volume or any other details, that in absence of such details the method adopted by the TPO had to be upheld. 3. 1. Before us, the Authorised Representative(AR) argued that the DRP itself had upheld the nearest date approach adopted by the assessee, th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

i. e. ₹ 58. 88 per Kg. , that the volumes picked up by the assessee were comparable to the transaction of 4. 98 Kgs. , that the AO had cherry-picked the lowest rate of ₹ 27. 54 per Kg. for making adjustments, that the comparison of the volume data adopted by the AO and the TPO clearly prove that volume had any impact on the price, that the DRP had heavily relied upon the volume theory. In these circumstances we are of the opinion that the data based on nearness of the date was a jus .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ot be endorsed. 4. Second transaction is of purchase of 19. 54 lakh Kgs. of Toluene @Rs. 47. 86 per Kg. The material was purchased on 05. 06. 2008. As the data for that day was not available the assessee used average rate of CUP data of 29. 05. 2008. However, the TPO took the lowest rates from the data used by the assessee and held that there were six transactions ranging from 75000kg. to 5 lakhs Kgs. , that price range varied from ₹ 44. 18 to ₹ 55. 91, that the assessee had purchase .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

parables. DR supported the order of the DRP. 4. 2. We have considered the material available on record. We find that the assessee had taken the average price of the transactions entered into on 29. 05. 2008, that the TPO had picked up the lowest rate . In our opinion picking up of a convenient or favourable data is not a proper method to determine the ALP. As per the provisions of section 92C(2)of the Act an arithmetic mean of the prices has to be adopted as the ALP when more than one comparable .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ride. The assessee had purchased the goods@ ₹ 76. 55 per Kg. It arrived at the average rate of ₹ 76. 88 per Kg. as the CUP rate. The TPO adopted the rate of ₹ 68. 76 per Kg. which was the lowest rate of all the transactions of 01. 08. 2008. The DRP upheld the order of the TPO holding that the assessee had mentioned that average taken by it considered the volume to transactions also. 5. 1. Before us, the AR stated volume of the product did not impact the rates of the products, t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Rs. per Kg. Similarly, 41, 000Kgs. goods were purchased @Rs. 76. 28 per Kg. We also find that the TPO had accepted the assessee s CUP dt. 30. 7. 2008 while determining the ALP of transaction dt. 29. 7. 08 for a transaction of One lakh Kgs. (pg-92 of the PB). considering these facts we find that the assessee had imported the material at the rate which fits within the ± 5% range of the CUP rate. The transaction is at arm s length. 6. The next transaction pertains to Mosstanol L . The asses .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of ₹ 26. 71 per Kg the TPO took the average of ₹ 21. 74 per Kg based on the data of 23. 1. 2008. The DRP following its order for the earlier transaction upheld the order of the TPO. 7. 1. Before us, the AR contended that the assessee had used CUP dated 30. 1. 2009, that the TPO had used 23. 1. 2009, but the date used by the TPO was further away than the CUP which the assessee had used. The DR supported the order of the DR. 7. 2. We find that the assessee had imported MEL on 27. 1. 20 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

our opinion adjustment made by the TPO was not proper. 8. Now we would take transaction No. 6 . The assessee had purchased 4 lakh Kgs of Toluene @Rs. 26. 38 per Kg. Since the comparable data for 12. 2. 2009 was not available the assessee used the data of 16. 2. 2009 (Rs. 26. 83 per Kg). The TPO chose to use data for 31. 1. 2009 (Rs. 24. 10 per Kg. ). The DRP upheld the order of the TPO referring to the earlier transactions. 8. 1Before us, the AR made same submissions made for the earlier year a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities – Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version