Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (5) TMI 76 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT

2016 (5) TMI 76 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT - TMI - Refund of amount paid to get the goods released - truck not stopped at the checkpost - Held that:- the powers under section 68 of the Act can be exercised at the time when the truck passes through the check-post. The same does not apply to a truck which has already crossed the check-post and has entered the State. Insofar as a truck which has already entered the State is concerned, it is the provisions of section 69 of the GVAT Act which are applicabl .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

no power of authority to detain such truck. Consequently, the recovery of the tax and penalty from the respondent dealer for release of the goods which had been seized in the purported exercise of powers under sub-section (4) of section 68 of the GVAT Act was without any authority of law. - The Tribunal in the impugned order has held that it is the transporterís liability under section 69(1) to obtain a transit pass from the check-post authority at the time of entry of the vehicle in the St .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

:- 1-4-2016 - MS. HARSHA DEVANI AND MR. G.R.UDHWANI, JJ. FOR THE APPELLANT : MR CHINTAN DAVE, ASSISTANT GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR THE OPPONENT : KUNTAL A PARIKH, ADVOCATE COMMON ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI) 1. Since all these appeals arise out of a common order passed by the Tribunal in Second Appeals No.45 to 48 of 2015 and the parties and facts are also common, the same were taken up for hearing together and are decided by this common order. 2. The appellant-State of Guj .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ice to transporter is not sufficient notice to the owner and thereby quashing the order? (3) Whether the Hon ble Tribunal has erred in law and in facts in holding that no tax and penalty can be levied as no tax incidence arose in the State of Gujarat? 3. For the purpose of appreciating the controversy in the present case, it would be germane to cull out the facts from the record of the case. The facts are that the respondent dealer had purchased goods, namely, granite from M/s. Jee Granites and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and brought back to the checkpost. The Commercial Tax Officer at Songadh Check-post, thereafter issued memos No.240 to 243 dated 1.7.2014, to the truck driver and the truck and the goods were seized on the spot. The respondent dealer being the purchaser of the goods in question was in need of the seized goods for its commercial purpose. Under the circumstances, having no other alternative, despite the absence of demand notice and an order confirming the demand under the said Act, the respondent .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ch observed that the only question which arose for consideration before it was whether the liability of the transporter can be fastened upon the dealer under the provisions of section 69 of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the GVAT Act ) and held that it is the liability of the transporter to obtain transit pass and if the transporter has committed any default, the dealer cannot be held liable and, accordingly, set aside the orders passed by the first appellate a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

disputedly the provisions of sections 68 and 69 of the GVAT Act have been violated. Mr. Dave further submitted that the truck driver did not stop the truck at the check-post for verification and that but for the fact that the officers of the Anti Corruption Bureau had intercepted the truck, the respondent would have never disclosed the transaction and would have evaded payment of tax. It was submitted that merely because the respondent resides and has a place of its business at Rajasthan, is not .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of Gujarat is not acceptable. It was submitted that since the respondent had failed to establish that the goods were transit goods, the incidence of tax falls in Gujarat. 4.1 Referring to the provisions of section 68 of the GVAT Act, it was contended that the liability under sub-section (5) thereof is appropriately placed on the owner, as unlike section 69, section 68(5) of the GVAT Act specifically includes the owner. It was, accordingly, urged that the Tribunal has erred in holding that the li .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he court to the provisions of section 69 of the GVAT Act, to submit that the liability to pay penalty under the said provision lies on the driver or the person in-charge of the vehicle and that no penalty can be imposed on the owner thereof. It was submitted that though the order passed by the Commercial Tax Officer is purported to have been passed in exercise of powers under section 68(5) of the GVAT Act, essentially the same is an order under section 69 of the GVAT Act and hence, no tax and pe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

o any question of law so as to warrant interference. It was submitted that the appeals, therefore, deserve to be dismissed. 6. The facts are not in dispute. The trucks in question which were carrying the goods of the respondent had crossed the Songadh Check-Post without stopping there and had been intercepted by the Anti Corruption Bureau. It appears that thereafter, the trucks were brought back to the check-post and in connection therewith the impugned order dated 7.8.2014 had been passed. It w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ablished under section 68 of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and since the conditions of sub-sections (2) and (3) have not been satisfied, the officer-in-charge of the Check Post has formed the opinion that - (1) The vehicle had not stopped at the checkpost, and despite the fact that the goods were being transported to Rajasthan, a transit pass had not been obtained. Hence, for the purpose of further scrutiny thereof. As indicated vide the order at reference (2), the truck together with th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ot obtained the Transit Pass in terms of section 69(1). It is compulsory to produce the bill bilty etc. documents in respect of the goods which are transported and the legal obligation to produce them before the incharge of the check-post in their correct form at the time of transport is cast upon the person in-charge of the vehicle/dealer. And in respect of the goods being transported by way of OUT TO OUT transactions, it is the responsibility of the dealer to obtain a transit pass specified by .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

challan shall be produced here. 7. These, in sum and substance, are the contents of the order dated 7.8.2014 passed by the Commercial Tax Officer, which has given rise to the present proceedings. 8. As is evident on a plain reading of the impugned order, it has been passed in the exercise of powers under sub-section (5) of section 68 of the GVAT Act. Reference may, therefore, be made to the provisions of section 68 of the Act, which provides for inspection of goods in transit. Sub-section (2) t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

his name and address and the names and addresses of the owner of the vehicle as well as of the consignor and consignee of such goods; and where any of the consignors or consignee is a dealer registered under the Act or the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, the driver or any other person in-charge of the vehicle shall also give the number and place of issue of the certificate of registration, if any, of such dealer. Sub-section (3) provides for further documents which the driver or person in-charge i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eized. Sub-section (5) provides for imposition of penalty in addition to tax payable under the Act after giving an opportunity of being heard to the owner, driver or person-incharge of the goods. Thus, section 68 of the GVAT Act provides for action to be taken at the time when a truck passes through the check-post or barrier set up under sub-section (1) of section 68. It is at that stage that the officer-in-charge of the check-post or barrier would call upon the driver to produce the documents w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Officer. However, after the truck had passed the check-post, the same was intercepted by the Anti Corruption authorities and was brought back to the check-post. In the opinion of this court, the powers under section 68 of the Act can be exercised at the time when the truck passes through the check-post. The same does not apply to a truck which has already crossed the check-post and has entered the State. Insofar as a truck which has already entered the State is concerned, it is the provisions o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

st or barrier before his exit from the State. Sub-section (2) of section 69 provides that if the driver or person-in-charge of such vehicle fails to deliver such transit pass throughout the State, he shall be liable to pay such penalty not exceeding one and a half times the amount of tax on goods carried by him as may be determined, after giving a reasonable opportunity of being heard. Thus, under subsection (1A) of section 69 of the GVAT Act, it is the liability of the driver or the person in-c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he Songadh Check-post; however, undisputedly in the facts of the present case the trucks in question have entered into the State without stopping at such check-post. Therefore, the authorities under the GVAT Act would have been justified in invoking the provisions of section 69 of the GVAT Act and taking action thereunder. However, curiously, the concerned authorities have adopted a novel course of action, inasmuch as, trucks which had already crossed the check post without obtaining transit pas .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he State, for the reason that if the truck is intercepted at such check-post, the same can be detained and the goods can be seized under section 68(4) of the Act, but ultimately, it is at that check-post that a transit pass is required to be issued and hence, it follows as a necessary corollary that there cannot be a breach of section 69 at the stage where the truck is stopped at the first check-post after its entry into the State. Besides, for breach of the provisions of section 69 of the GVAT .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rities did not directly invoke the provisions of section 69 of the GVAT Act but chose to resort to the provisions of section 68 thereof. The reason is not far to seek. Under sub-section (2) of section 69 of the GVAT Act, it is the driver or the person-in-charge of the vehicle who is liable to pay penalty as prescribed thereunder. Moreover, section 69 does not empower the authorities under the GVAT Act to seize the goods or detain the truck in case the driver or person-incharge of the vehicle fai .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s the authorities cannot seize the goods and detain the truck, the authorities would not be in a position to coerce the owner of the goods to pay the penalty levied thereunder. Therefore, it appears that the authorities under the GVAT Act with a view to circumvent the provisions of section 69 of the GVAT Act which does not permit them to seize the goods and detain the vehicle have in the purported exercise of powers under section 68(4), seized the goods and detained the trucks for breach of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

prejudicially affected, a dealer succumbs to pressure and pays the tax and penalty demanded by the authorities under the GVAT Act despite there being no liability on his part to pay the amounts demanded. In the opinion of this court, the action taken by the authorities under the GVAT Act of seizing the goods and detaining the vehicles for breach of the provisions of section 69 of the GVAT Act in the manner described hereinabove, which is not backed by any statutory power is required to be deprec .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version