GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
What's New Case Laws Highlights Articles News Forum Short Notes Statutory TMI SMS More ...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (7) TMI 1083 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

2015 (7) TMI 1083 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT - [2016] 380 ITR 462 - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - undisclosed gifts - Held that:- The assessee furnished the details regarding the bank accounts from where she got the gifts, the dates, the details of the bank accounts and the demand drafts of Toronto Dominion Bank, Canada, were furnished to substantiate that the gift was from her brother who was residing at Canada. The concealment, as such, in the facts and circumstances, was missing, as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tting aside the penalty, cannot be said to be perverse or suffering from such illegality which would warrant interference. - Decided in favour of assessee - I. T. A. No. 57 of 2013 (O&M) - Dated:- 31-7-2015 - S. J. Vazifdar (ACJ) And G. S. Sandhawalia, JJ. For the Petitioner : Denesh Goyal For the Respondent : Salil Kapoor, Sanat Kapoor JUDGMENT G. S. Sandhawalia, J. 1. The present appeal, filed by the Revenue is directed against the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Amritsar, which al .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mum penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, by the Assessing Officer at ₹ 46,09,590 ? (ii) On the facts and in the circumstances of the case whether the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was correct to direct the Assessing Officer to cancel the penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, at ₹ 46,09,590 in the case wherein the asses see has totally failed to fulfil the basic ingredients laid down under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

come by invoking Part B of Explanation 1 below section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ?" 3. The respondent, along with the return, had appended a note in the computation of the income that during the relevant year, she had received a gift from her brother to the tune of ₹ 1,33,88,413 and from her sister to the tune of ₹ 1 lakh, through bank drafts which had been credited into her savings bank accounts. On account of explanation sought by the Department, she represented on .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

or concealing/furnishing the incomplete particulars of income, penalty proceedings be not initiated. 4. On August 10, 2011, an explanation was given by the assessee that a sum of ₹ 77,75,37.97 and ₹ 56,14,035.09 were received from her brother by way of demand drafts, drawn on Toronto Dominion Bank, Canada. Further explanation was given that her relationship had got strained with him and she was not able to contact him and he had shifted to some other country. The amount was offered f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

;Income from other sources" and, vide order dated September 26, 2011, initiated proceedings for furnishing inadequate particulars of income. The Assessing Officer, accordingly, came to the conclusion that on account of failure to substantiate her claim and to furnish the documentary evidence, inaccurate particulars had been furnished and levied penalty, vide order dated February 16, 2012. 6. An appeal was preferred unsuccessfully before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Amritsar, by .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d the tax credentials with the Canadian Government. 7. The assessee carried the matter further to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Amritsar (for short, "the Tribunal") successfully, as noticed above, which noticed that the gifts had been declared as note to the computation of income filed with the return of income. The explanation that her relationship had become strained since the tax return had been given 2 years earlier before the assessment proceedings and, therefore, confirmatio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Latest Notifications:

    Dated      Category

20-7-2017 Cus (NT)

18-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 CE (NT)

18-7-2017 CE

18-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

15-7-2017 Kerala SGST

14-7-2017 Andhra Pradesh SGST

14-7-2017 Cus (NT)

14-7-2017 Cus

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 ADD

13-7-2017 ADD

12-7-2017 Jammu & Kashmir SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 CGST Rate

12-7-2017 UTGST Rate

12-7-2017 UTGST Rate

12-7-2017 IGST Rate

More Notifications


Latest Circulars:

19-7-2017 Income Tax

18-7-2017 Customs

17-7-2017 Customs

14-7-2017 Income Tax

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

7-7-2017 Income Tax

7-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

More Circulars



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version