Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Indus Finance Corporation Ltd. (Formerly Known as Subuthi Finance Ltd.) Versus Commissioner of Income-Tax and another

Scope of rectification of mistake - Held that:- From a reading of the Circular No. 68, dated November 17, 1971 issued by the Board relating to rectification of mistakes relied on by the assessee, it would be evident that the above circular would be relevant in a proceeding under section 154 only in relation to such issues, which have already been considered in the order and have subsequently been put to rest by the decision of the Supreme Court and, thereafter, it can be a ground for rectificati .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sues, which were decided against the assessee, which was subsequently affirmed by the Supreme Court. Further, an application under section 154 was also pursued simultaneously, which we find is akin to riding two horses at the same time. Unfortunately, the assessee having abandoned the plea before the High Court, the plea, which was raised in the section 154 application would clearly show that it is a new plea, which they want to pursue in terms of the provisions of section 154.

Yet an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

reciation, the income should also be deleted, has no legs to stand. That fact was not the issue in the first round of appeal. At best it may be treated as a finding of the Assessing Officer, accepted by the assessee and abandoned in the course of appeal proceedings but it cannot be said that it is a mistake apparent on record warranting invocation of rectification proceedings under section 154 of the Act. For the reasons abovesaid, this court holds that the provisions of section 154(1A) does not .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

uthorities for the same relief. Therefore, the Tribunal was correct in declining to interfere with its earlier order and dismissing the application, as there was no scope for rectifying any mistake, since there was no mistake apparent from the record, as envisaged under section 154(1A), in view of the findings rendered earlier. For the reasons aforesaid, the substantial question of law is answered in favour of the respondent-Revenue and against the appellant-assessee. - T. C. A. No. 536 of 2005a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

l questions of law for consideration : "TCA No. 536 of 2005 (1) Whether the Tribunal is right in law in holding that section 154(1A) is a bar to the rectification of the errors in question ? (2) Whether the Tribunal is right in its interpretation of the scope of section 154(1A) and in its conclusion that notwithstanding the question of the inclusion of the rental income not being in issue in the appeals before the Tribunal and the High Court, such an issue cannot be covered in the rectifica .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ion under section 254(2) of the Income- tax Act for the exclusion of lease rentals which have been included in the total income in the returns ?" 2. Section 154(2) of the Income-tax Act provides for rectification of mistake. In these appeals, we are now concerned with an application filed by the assessee under section 154(1A). Section 154(1A), clothes the authority, who passed the order, with power to deal with the order, for the purpose of amending the order under sub-section (1) in relati .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ng contained in any law for the time being in force, amend the order under that sub-section in relation to any matter other than the matter which has been so considered and decided." 3. Mr. Sridhar, learned counsel appearing for the appellant, has raised a legal plea that despite the issue being held against the assessee in the assessment order, which has subsequently been confirmed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), the Tribunal, the High Court as well as the Supreme Court, the a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

conducted on August 7, 1996, and consequent to the search, block assessment under section 158BC of the Act was framed by the Assessing Officer for the block period comprising assessment years 1993-94 to 1996-97 on October 29, 1997. Prior to the search, the appellant-assessee had filed regular return of income for the various years. In the original return of income filed for the assessment year 1995-96, prior to the date of search, the transaction relating to purchase and lease of two pusher typ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to 1996-97 in response to the notice issued by the Assessing Officer under section 158BC of the Act. In that, the appellant maintained the original claim of income/lease as well as depreciation. 5. In the course of search proceedings, the transaction of the assessee in respect of the agreement with Duckfin International Pvt. Ltd. relating to leasing of continuous pusher type furnaces on sale and lease back was found to be fictitious. The acts in relation to the said transaction is recorded in pa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

crores on claim of depreciation in the return and to admit it as income. Since he himself agreed for this surrender there is no valid reason for him to take a different stand at this state. The entire transaction is routed as money transaction for non-existing assets and it is a money lending business. The asset has already suffered depreciation. Therefore, the assessee's acceptance before the authorities for surrender of depreciation claimed is correct. For the above reasons, depreciation t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

1,30,38,000 In paragraph 7, 5 per cent. on lease expenses of ₹ 3,61,64,802 has been disallowed 18,08,240 Undisclosed income for the block period 1,48,46,240 Tax calculation Income-tax thereon 89,07,744 Add : Surcharge 13,36,162 Balance payable 1,02,43,906 This should be paid as per demand notice and challan enclosed. 7. Aggrieved by the order passed under section 158BC, the assessee filed an appeal before the Tribunal. The Tribunal, after referring to the factual matrix, recorded a finding .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Bhargava, Director (Finance) of M/s. Duckfin International Ltd., dated August 1, 1996, wherein it is stated that no asset has been provided or installed at any of this factory premises and the suppliers M/s. Paras Inds. are paper concerns only. What do you have to say particularly in view of the fact that the assets leased by you have not been identified by you and you have not taken any machinery number such particulars as mentioned in answer to question No. 8. Moreover, you have also claimed .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the return for the block period and pay the taxes accordingly." 8. The Tribunal, after considering the plea of the assessee that it is a genuine transaction and the challenge to the assessment order under section 158BC on the merits, and taking into consideration the statement recorded from the managing director, on oath, coupled with the documents, which proved that there was a false and bogus claim, came to hold that the assessment order passed under section 158BC was justified and, accor .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ngs are not necessarily the starting point for the framing of the regular assessment. However, these decisions would have no applicability at all in view of the special provisions for search cases having been introduced in the statute. As mentioned earlier, section 158B of the Act while defining the block period refers to the period of search ending with the period in which the search was made under section 132 of the Act. It also draws reference of the undisclosed income for which search is mad .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rsued the matter in appeal, TCA No. 238 of 2001, before this court. It would be useful and relevant to extract the grounds raised by the assessee in the appeal before the Tribunal, which forms part of the papers filed in the appeal before this court : "Aggrieved by the said order the appellant preferred an appeal to the Tribunal wherein the following issues were canvassed in support for quashing the said block assessment order. (a) The investigation reports were not put to the appellant and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ept in the answer to the last question on difference consideration. (d) The disallowance of a claim would not come within the pur view of the definition of 'undisclosed income' as defined in section 158B of the Act so as to make a block assessment. (e) Bona fide nature of the said claim was not considered while framing the assessment inasmuch as the assets were inspected by the officials of M/s. Bank of Madura, Authorities of the insurance company and financial institution of State of Ma .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

not be considered as undis closed income within the definition. (b) All the details were provided to support the expenses. (c) No opportunity was given before the said disputed disallow ance. The appellant had also objected the correctness of the chargeability of surcharge by the respondent." 10. The assessee also challenged the order of the Tribunal by raising the following grounds in its appeal before this court : "(vi) The Tribunal failed to appreciate that the block assessment and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d shown the lease income from the said transaction and further failed to appreciate that surrender of depreciation claim in the sworn statement should be considered in the context of admission of the said lease income in the regular return inasmuch as in any event the difference of the said amount of depreciation claim and the lease income in the regular returns filed for the respective years should alone be assessable under the block assessment. (xxiii) The Tribunal failed to appreciate that in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t on the total claim. (xxv) The Tribunal failed to give any finding on the submissions and arguments with regard to the correctness of chargeability of surcharge while making the computation of undisclosed income in terms of Chapter XIV-B of the Act." 11. Nine substantial questions of law were raised in the appeal, TCA No. 238 of 2001. Though so many questions of law were raised, at the time of hearing of the appeal, the very same counsel represented and argued the matter before the Bench a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

furnished ; and (c) that the depreciation on two continuous push type furnaces that were leased to M/s. Duckfin International Ltd. was not allowed." 12. The Bench, after hearing either side, disposed of the matter on April 19, 2004, rejecting the plea of the assessee on all the three issues. On the first issue, the court held that the Tribunal, on verification of the original records, came to hold that approval was granted by the Commissioner of Income-tax as provided under section 158BC. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sale and lease back transaction. M/s. Paras Industries manufactured the furnace and delivered to M/s. Duckfin International Ltd., which were installed at the cost of ₹ 66 lakhs each. The same is stated to have been entered into by the assessee with M/s. Duckfin International Ltd., on sale and lease back transaction at ₹ 1,30,38,000. When the search was conducted at the business premises of the assessee at Mumbai, no lease agreement was found and only a copy of invoice was located. M .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Industries does not exist and the so- called lease was more paper transaction and the assets mentioned in these leases did not exist. When Mr. Balakrishnan, managing director was confronted, he surrendered on behalf of the company the depreciation claimed to the tune of ₹ 1.30 crores on the assets leased to M/s. Duckfin International Ltd. That being so, the depreciation on two continuous push type furnaces that were leased to M/s. Duckfin International Ltd., was rightly disallowed." 1 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

assessee filed a petition on March 1, 2002, under section 154 of the Act for rectification before the Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Company Circle VI(4), praying to delete the lease rental of ₹ 86.94 lakhs offered as income. On March 14, 2002, supplementary petition under section 154 was filed before the Assessing Officer praying for deletion of ₹ 18,08,240 being ad hoc disallowance at the rate of 5 per cent. of the lease expenses. However, on March 18, 2002, the Assessing O .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s further submitted that in the light of the said factual position, the entire order of the Tribunal is liable to be recalled for fresh hearing in the interest of justice. To fortify the above submissions, the petitioner is bringing to the notice of the hon'ble Bench the following issues which are originally agitated and not considered while passing the said order : (a) Denial of opportunity to cross-examine Mr. Deepak Bargava of M/s. Duckfin International Ltd. while framing the said assessm .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

income from the said transaction in the regular returns before the date of search would clearly indicate to the effect that the said disallowance of depreciation would not lead to the legal presumption to the effect that there was no undisclosed income to be assessed in terms of Chapter XIV-B of the Act. In the alternative depreciation claim might be considered as undisclosed income subject to the due set off for the lease income admitted in the regular returns. (f) Decision of the Bangalore Be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on record and as a consequence while rejecting the said transaction as sham the loss arising on account of the same should be considered for allowability in terms of section 28 of the Act. (i) Disallowance of lease charges on an estimated basis was wrongly made. (j) Surcharge was levied as against the rate of taxation prescribed for Chapter XIV-B assessment. In the circumstances, it is prayed that the order of the Tribunal dated April 12, 2001, may be recalled and a direction may be issued to th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t of the said transaction." 16. In the petition filed under section 154, the appellant has highlighted the erroneous computation made with regard to the undisclosed income. For better appreciation, the relevant portion of the petition is extracted hereinbelow : "11. In the light of the conclusion by the assessing authority that there was no genuine lease transaction on the ground that there was no existing asset in respect of which the aforesaid lease was entered into and consistent wi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

depreciation amounting to ₹ 1,30,38,000. 12. The petitioner states and submits that the inclusion of the aforesaid lease rental income in the total income for the block period while disallowing the claim for depreciation in respect of the same asset in respect of which the lease transaction was claimed by the petitioner amounts to a patent error, which is liable to be rectified. The error comprises either in including the lease income or in dis allowing the claim for depreciation. Both th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

its that the computation of the undisclosed income for the block period is erro neous in so far as it has included the lease rental amounting ₹ 86,94,000 and the said mistake has to be rectified by excluding the said amount from the total income computed. Accordingly, the petitioner states and submits that as against the undisclosed income for the block period determined at ₹ 1,48,46,240 the lease rental income included thereon amounting to ₹ 86.94 lakhs will have to be exclude .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssessing authority at the rate of 60 per cent. he has added surcharge amounting to ₹ 13,36,162. The petitioner states and submits that surcharge is not leviable in respect of an assessment under Chapter XIV-B. Surcharge is levied under the Finance Act relating to each year. In so far as the block assessment is made for a block period and not for any specific year of assessment, surcharge cannot be levied in respect of such an assessment." 18. This new plea of deletion of income from l .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ome-tax under section 154 of the Act, the following four issues were considered : "(i) Exclusion of lease rentals of ₹ 86.94 lakhs from the undisclosed income computed in the assessment order dated October 29, 1997. (ii) Rectification of calculation mistake in the computation of undisclosed income. (iii) Recomputation of Income-tax on the income arrived at after the above rectification. (iv) Deletion of surcharge." 19. On the plea of deletion of income from lease rentals, the aut .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f the order, for better appreciation of the case, is quoted hereinbelow : "From the facts, it will appear that since the asset did not exist, the transaction was treated as a finance transaction and the claim for depreciation on the non-existing asset was disallowed. It is not the assessee's case that it did not receive the lease rentals. The question whether the money received in the name of lease rentals is the asses see's income or not is obviously not a matter to be decided in a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

issue of disallowance of 5 per cent. of lease expenses, it was held that the same cannot be termed as a mistake apparent from the records and the said issue being a legal issue, cannot be agitated in a petition filed under section 154. Further, the assessee has taken up this issue as well in the miscellaneous petition filed before the Tribunal and, for the above reasons, the said contention was rejected. The relevant portion is extracted hereinbelow : "5. The assessee's objection to th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ordingly rejected. On the imposition of surcharge, it was held that the matter having already been taken up before the Tribunal in the miscellaneous petition, the said issue was not gone into. The relevant portion of the order is extracted hereinbelow : "6. It is submitted by the assessee's representative that there is an arithmetical error in the computation of undisclosed income made in the assessment order. I find that the assessee has added the income computed in the regular assessm .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t surcharge is not leviable in a block assessment and reliance is placed in the decision of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench, in the case of Microland Ltd. v. Asst. CIT [1998] 67 ITD 446 (Bang). Under section 113, the total undisclosed income of the block period shall be chargeable to tax at 60 per cent. and the Finance Act of each year provides that the amount of Income-tax computed in accordance with the provisions of section 113 shall be increased by a surcharge as provided .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the adjudicating authority in the following manner : "2. The appellant is aggrieved with the above findings of the Assessing Officer. The grounds and the subsequent written submission filed has been duly considered. I find from these grounds that the appellant is merely arguing on the merits of the issue rather than on the scope of the section 154. It is also important to note that the substantive appeal has already been dismissed by the Tribunal. The issues raised in the petition relat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rmed." 23. Further appeal by the assessee to the Tribunal came to be dismissed on September 15, 2004. The Tribunal was of the view that there was no scope for considering an issue, which has already been considered and decided in the appeal by the hon'ble High Court. The Tribunal further went on to interpret section 154(1A) and held that the scope of section 154(1A) provides that matters which were considered and decided by the appellate authority cannot be rectified and further went on .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e Assessing Officer under section 154 of the Act flow from the provisions of that section only. The language of section 154(1A) of the Act makes it abundantly clear that the matter which is considered and decided by the appellate authority cannot be rectified. The matter means all facts of the matter which come within the scope of the appeal. If the appeal is filed relating to the matter and the same was considered and decided or be treated to have been considered or decided by the appellate aut .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the assessee itself offered the income during search, then it is not open for it to re-agitate through rectification under section 154 of the Act for exclusion of lease rentals which has been declared by itself in the block return. 12. In view of the above, we are of the considered opinion that the issues taken up by the assessee are debatable and these cannot be taken up by way of rectification under section 154 of the Act. Even otherwise, when the matter is considered by the appellate authori .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

st the dismissal of the miscellaneous application by the Tribunal on the ground that the appellant cannot seek rectification under section 254(2) to rectify the mistake apparent on record. 25. The application for rectification under section 254(2), viz., M. P. No. 70 of 2001, has been admittedly filed before the Tribunal after the appeal has been disposed of by the High Court and the Supreme Court. Against the order passed by the Tribunal in dismissing the said application, TCA No. 590 of 2008 i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sed and decided in the appeal or revision and the entire grounds raised in the appeal being in relation to false claim of depreciation, the application under section 154 of the Act to delete the lease income is in order. The application under section 154 actually flows as a consequence of the proceedings culminating before the Supreme Court. The sole object of the order is disallowance of depreciation holding the transaction as bogus or paper transaction. If the income is booked on such a transa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

would be in order, provided the same is filed within the period of limitation. 27. Learned counsel for the assessee also relied upon the decision of this court in the case of CIT v. Lakshmi Vilas Bank [2010] 329 ITR 591 (Mad), to drive home the point that issues, which have not been decided earlier can be raised in an application filed for rectification under section 154. 28. The decision of the Calcutta High Court in the case of CIT v. Karam Chand Thapar and Sons Ltd. [1990] 186 ITR 368 (Cal), .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

l appearing for the respondent-Department, submitted that the assessee having abandoned the plea in the first round of litigation, which has reached finality, cannot now raise a new plea under the guise of rectification of mistake. To buttress this argument, the learned counsel for the Revenue relied upon the decision of the Orissa High Court in Utkal Galvanizers P. Ltd. v. Asst. CIT [2008] 298 ITR 53 (Orissa), wherein the Orissa High Court held that the power vested under section 154(1A) is lim .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the appellant, this court would like to examine the provisions of section 154 of the Act as to the powers vested on the authority in relation to rectification of mistakes apparent on record. 32. Section 154 of the Income-tax Act provides for rectification of mistake. In the present case, this court is concerned with an application filed by the assessee under section 154(1A). For better appreciation of the case, at the risk of repetition, section 154 of the Act is extracted hereinbelow : "1 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force, amend the order under that sub-section in relation to any matter other than the matter which has been so considered and decided. (2) Subject to the other provisions of this section, the authority concerned- (a) may make an amendment under sub-section (1) of its own motion, and (b) shall make such amendment for rectifying any such mistake which has been brought to its notice by the assessee, and where the authority concer .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ng by way of appeal or revision relating to an order referred to under sub-section (1), i.e., the order that is sought to be rectified, the authority passing such order may amend the order under sub-section (1) in relation to any matter other than the matter, which has been considered and decided. A reading of this provision would only mean that the power to rectify the mistake in the order should not be in relation to the issues considered and decided in the said order. What is excluded from re .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tation of the legal provisions and claims based upon such interpretation cannot be a ground to seek rectification of the order already passed. 34. In Utkal Galvanizers P. Ltd. v. Asst. CIT [2008] 298 ITR 53 (Orissa), the Orissa High Court, while dealing with the scope of rectification of mistakes apparent on record in an application filed under section 154 held that the power vested under section 154(1A) is limited to mistakes apparent from the record and the same does not include powers to revi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

absence of any challenge permitting the Assessing Officer to vary or review or revise his own order under a plea of correcting the mistake as contemplated under section 154 is to in effect allow him to override or overreach the order passed by the higher authorities in appeal or revision. This is clearly not the intention of legislation of section 154(1A) of the Income-tax Act. We are of the view that the scope of section 154(1A) remains limited to the 'mistakes apparent from records'. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d only throw light in support of our findings in the present case, as made above (page 598 of 329 ITR) : In the judgment reported in CIT v. Hero Cycles Pvt. Ltd. [1997] 228 ITR 463 (SC), the hon'ble apex court was pleased to hold that a rectification under section 154 can only be made when there is a glaring mistake of fact or law committed by the officer passing the order becomes apparent from the record. In the said case, the issue was the consideration of the granting of weighted deductio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Utkal Galvanizers P. Ltd. v. Asst. CIT [2008] 298 ITR 53 (Orissa) the issue of merger was considered by the Division Bench of the Orissa High Court. In the said case, the issue which was decided earlier before the appellate authority was sought to be raised again before the Assessing Officer by invoking section 154. Therefore, under those circumstances, the Division Bench of the Orissa High Court was pleased to hold that when an issue was already decided then permitting the said issue to be rai .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s also not applicable to the present case on hand . . . In the judgment reported in CIT v. Y. K. Shoji Stone Indo P. Ltd. [2008] 304 ITR 390 (Mad) (in which one of us is a party K. Raviraja Pandian J.) it has been observed as follows (page 393 of 304 ITR) : "It is well recognised law that any erroneous assessment cannot be the subject matter for rectification under section 154 of the Income-tax Act. The erroneous order of assessment can be rectified only under procedure known to law by carr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ably two opinions. A decision on a debatable point of law cannot be regarded as a mistake apparent on the face of the record amenable for rectification under section 154 of the Income-tax Act. Useful reference can be had to the judgments of T. S. Balaram, ITO v. Volkart Brothers reported in [1971] 82 ITR 50 (SC) and CIT v. Hero Cycles Pvt. Ltd. reported in [1997] 228 ITR 463 (SC). Hence, we do not find any question of law, much less, substantial question of law, for entertaining this appeal as t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

a result of sub sequent interpretation of law by the Supreme Court would constitute 'a mistake apparent from the records' and rectificatory action under section 35/154 of the 1922 Act or the 1961 Act would be in order. It has, therefore, been decided that where an assessee moves an application under section 154 pointing out that in the light of a later decision of the Supreme Court pronouncing the correct legal position, a mistake has occurred in any of the completed assessments in his c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eading of the above circular, relied on by the assessee, it would be evident that the above circular would be relevant in a proceeding under section 154 only in relation to such issues, which have already been considered in the order and have subsequently been put to rest by the decision of the Supreme Court and, thereafter, it can be a ground for rectification. If, in the original order, there is no such issue, a new plea, based on a decision of the Supreme Court, cannot be raised in an applica .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n under section 154 was also pursued simultaneously, which we find is akin to riding two horses at the same time. Unfortunately, the assessee having abandoned the plea before the High Court, the plea, which was raised in the section 154 application would clearly show that it is a new plea, which they want to pursue in terms of the provisions of section 154. 39. Yet another factor, which goes against the assessee in the original order itself relates to the plea of income from lease equipment, whi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

At best it may be treated as a finding of the Assessing Officer, accepted by the assessee and abandoned in the course of appeal proceedings but it cannot be said that it is a mistake apparent on record warranting invocation of rectification proceedings under section 154 of the Act. For the reasons abovesaid, this court holds that the provisions of section 154(1A) does not provide for rectification in the manner, which the appellant now pleads before this court. The case of the appellant-assessee .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Forum: GST on RCM on rent in a unregistered state

Forum: COMPOSITION SCHEME

Forum: Input Tax Credit - Reg

Forum: GST Invoice

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Highlight: Levy of additions tax u/s 115O on distribution of dividend - shares of its profits declared as distributable among the shareholders is not impressed with the character of the profit from which it reaches the hands of the shareholder - not to be bifurcated as agriculture and non-agriculture dividend - SC

Highlight: Rate of GST on old and scrap buses - 28% or 18% - at such initial tender process initiated by the Respondents-KSRTC, the present petitions filed by the petitioners are premature and misconceived and do not require any interference by this Court at this stage. - HC

Forum: Rent a cab operator

Highlight: In view of amendment made u/s 132A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by Finance Act of 2017, the 'reason to believe' or 'reason to suspect', as the case may be, shall not be disclosed to any person or any authority or the Appellate Tribunal, SC dismissed the appeal of the assessee

Highlight: Validity of Assessment Order - period of limitation u/s 153 (2A) is applicable even if the entire order was not set aside but matter was remanded back for for limited aspects with directions - HC

News: Note ban was a shake-up, achieved its main objectives

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Highlight: Levying interest u/s 234C - interest is to be charged on the returned income and not on assessed income.

Highlight: Accrual of income - sale of right to develop and sell incentive FSI under LOI - till the conditions of LOI are fulfilled transfer is not complete and income does not accrue to the assessee

Highlight: TPA - determination of ALP - TP adjustment by applying Bright Line Test (BLT) is not sustainable on protective basis having no statutory mandate.

Highlight: Safeguard Duty - Advance License Scheme - as there is no exemption from safeguard duty leviable under Section 8C, which is imposed on the goods imported from China, the importer has to pay safeguard duty

Highlight: Manufacture - process of cutting of waste plastic container - Such plastic containers before and after cutting are nothing but waste / scrap - Not a manufacturing activity as no new product emerges.

News: NITI Aayog and Govt. of Assam organizes workshop on health sector reforms in Guwahati; launches SATH- Sustainable Action for Transforming Human Capital

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Forum: GSTR 3B Rectification

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

Highlight: Classification printed computer stationary/manifold Business Forms - to be classified under Chapter Heading 4820.00 or under Chapter Heading 4901.90 - items like A4 sheets, advertisement and job card to be classified under Chapter 49

Article: RCM Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version