Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Income-tax Officer, Ward 6 (2) , Bengaluru Versus M/s. Karnataka State Co-operative Federation Ltd.

Eligibility to exemption exemption u/s.80P and 10(23C) - Held that:- Despite the expiry of more than 18 months, AO did not respond to the remand order of the CIT (A) and therefore the CIT (A) was left with no option but to decide the appeal of the assessee without having the benefit of the remand report of the AO. We find that there is no justification or explanation by the Department as to why the AO has not submitted the remand report or other report of not submitting the remand report. Theref .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

full opportunity to the AO for examination of the claim, then in the absence of any claim of the Revenue that assessee is not entitled for the exemption u/s.80P and 10(23C) of he Act, we do not find any error or reason to interfere with the impugned order of the CIT (A). - Decided against revenue - I.T.A No. 922/Bang/2014 - Dated:- 29-4-2016 - Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Judicial Member And Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Accountant Member For the Petitioner : Shri. Sandeep, CA For the Respondent : Shri. P. Dhiva .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ome and declared "NIL" taxable income in Schedule BP without setting off the above income or claiming any exemption or deduction whatsoever. 3. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case the learned CIT(A) erred in law in holding that all of the additions/ disallowances made by the AO are exempt by placing reliance on her earlier order for AY 2005-06, without appreciating the fact that the assessee has not claimed any exemption u/s 10 or any deduction under Chapter VIA in its Re .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hort), vide intimation dt.10.05.2011. In the said intimation the AO at CPC processed the return and added a sum of ₹ 2,95,98,463/- under the head ' income from business or profession' and raised a demand of ₹ 2,35,69,278/-. 4. Aggrieved by the said addition and consequential demand, assessee filed an appeal before the CIT (A) and contended that the assessee has shown nil income in the return of income. It was pointed out that in the return of income against computation of pro .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to the AO for verification. But despite several reminders over a period of 18 months, AO did not submit its report. CIT (A) has decided the appeal of the assessee by allowing the claim and deleting the addition. 5. We have heard the Ld. DR as well as the Ld. AR and considered the relevant material on record. Ld. DR has submitted that the CIT (A) has allowed the claim of exemption u/s.10 which was not claimed by the assessee in the return of income and further the claim was allowed without examin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ror in the return of income in mentioning the business income and then claiming exemption of the same, cannot be a reason for making such addition by the AO when the income was otherwise not taxable in the hands of the assessee. In support of his contention he has relied upon the decision of Mumbai bench of this Tribunal in the case of Shrikant Real Estates P. Ltd v. ITO [22 ITR (Trib) 266]. Ld. AR pointed out that this is a bonafide mistake in the ereturn filed by the assessee and therefore the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he assessee has not admitted any income in the return of income, then while making the addition / adjustment u/s.143(1) of the Act, the AO cannot consider only one aspect of the matter being the income which was not disclosed by the assessee in a particular column. But the eligibility of the said income for exemption u/s.80P of the Act and further exemption u/s.10 of the Act, as the government grant are exempted u/s.10(23C)(iiib) of the Act, was also required to be examined. We find that when th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hedule BP. The matter was also remanded to the AO for verification but, despite several reminders over a span of 18 months, no reply has been received from the AO. Therefore, on the basis of the materials available on record, appellant's arguments and records and certain files, the case has been decided. 3.2 The AO [in this case the ACIT (CPC)] was, therefore, not justified in making the additions or disallowances. However, no attempt is made here to annul the intimation u/s 143(1) of the Ac .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

herefore the CIT (A) was left with no option but to decide the appeal of the assessee without having the benefit of the remand report of the AO. We find that there is no justification or explanation by the Department as to why the AO has not submitted the remand report or other report of not submitting the remand report. Therefore it is clear that the AO was not having any explanation or reason for not filing the remand report. Even otherwise, it is not the case of the Revenue that the assessee .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ower authorities and the copy of the revised e-return filed by the assessee. In the present system of e-filing of return which is totally dependent upon the usage of software, it is possible that some clerical errors may occur at the time of entering the data in the electronic form. The return is prepared electronically which is converted into an XML file either through the free downloadable software provided by the CBDT or by the software available in the market. In either case, there is every .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version