New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (5) TMI 246 - ITAT CHENNAI

2016 (5) TMI 246 - ITAT CHENNAI - TMI - Addition towards inflation of purchase of rice - Held that:- What is to be seen is whether the assessee has purchased the paddy or not. In this case disallowance was made only on the ground that the assessee has not produced the bills and vouchers. The fact remains that the assessee has produced bought note which contains the names of the farmers and their village names. By referring to the village name and name of the farmers, one can easily identify the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

paddy and sell in a later stage is farfetched. Paddy is not a perishable commodity. The paddy harvested by the agriculturists can be stored for a reasonable period of time. At the best, the moisture content may be reduced by passage of time. The paddy is not a perishable commodity. Therefore, merely because the bills were raised during the period when there was no harvest, that cannot be a reason to doubt the purchase itself. Rule 6DD relaxes the rigour of provisions of Section 40A(3) of the Act .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ted the addition - Decided in favour of assessee.

Unexplained cash deposit in bank account - Held that:- The CIT(Appeals), by following his own order in the assessee's own case for assessment year 2007-08, found that the net available cash as on 31.03.2007 was ₹ 5,23,773/-. Therefore, the CIT(Appeals) presumed that the assessee could explain the source for making investment in the bank account. As rightly submitted by the Ld.counsel for the assessee, this fact needs to be verifi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

at:- The Assessing Officer disallowed the claim of the assessee only on the ground that the balance sheet does not reflect the loan/advance said to be given by the assessee to his wife Smt. Punitha Balakrishnan. The fact remains that the loan was given through four cheques on four different dates. This fact is not disputed by the Revenue. When the amount was transferred from the bank by means of cheques, this Tribunal is of the considered opinion that rejection of claim of the assessee only on t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) -VII, dated 30.12.2013, in respect of two independent assessees, for the assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09. Since common issue arises for consideration in these appeals, we heard all these appeals together and disposing of the same by this common order. 2. In I.T.A. Nos.991 & 992/Mds/2014, the admitted tax is less than ₹ 10 lakhs. In view of the circular of CBDT in Circular No. 21/2015 dated 10.12.2015, this Tribunal is of the considered opi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ccount were maintained. The assessee clarified that the deposit of ₹ 33,78,600/- was purported to be in connection with Trading, Profit & Loss account of the assessee. The assessee claimed before the Assessing Officer that he has purchased paddy from farmers for a sum of ₹ 8,07,747/-. The assessee has maintained bought notes wherein the names of the farmers and the dates of purchase were said to be mentioned. According to the Ld. D.R., the bought notes were not produced before th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s not correct to say that bought note was not produced before the Assessing Officer. Referring to the assessment order, more particularly page 5, para 1.3, the Ld.counsel submitted that the Assessing Officer in categorical terms says that the bought note purchase bills examined . However, the Assessing Officer has added that it does not contain complete names and address of the farmers. Referring to the dates mentioned in the bought note, the Assessing Officer observed that the period of yieldin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s proposed by the Assessing Officer, then the gross profit of the ratio would go to 52% which is abnormal. Referring to the export made by the assessee to the extent of ₹ 33,78,600/-, the Ld.counsel submitted that unless purchase was made, the assessee could not have exported the rice. 6. We have considered the rival submissions on either side and perused the relevant material available on record. The Assessing Officer doubted the purchase of paddy to the extent of ₹ 8,07,747/-. It i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

bit of issuing any bills for sale of their agricultural produce. This fact which prevails in this country cannot be ignored by the Income-tax Department, when the agricultural produces are purchased from the agriculturists. What is to be seen is whether the assessee has purchased the paddy or not. In this case disallowance was made only on the ground that the assessee has not produced the bills and vouchers. The fact remains that the assessee has produced bought note which contains the names of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

address of the farmers. 7. The next contention of the Assessing Officer appears to be that the farmers could not preserve their paddy and sell in a later stage. The argument of the Assessing Officer is farfetched. Paddy is not a perishable commodity. The paddy harvested by the agriculturists can be stored for a reasonable period of time. At the best, the moisture content may be reduced by passage of time. The paddy is not a perishable commodity. Therefore, merely because the bills were raised d .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

turists is something which cannot be obtained by the assessee. In those circumstances, this Tribunal is of the considered opinion that the CIT(Appeals) has rightly deleted the addition of ₹ 8,07,747/-. 8. The next ground of appeal is with regard to disallowance of ₹ 4,55,000/-. 9. Dr. B. Nischal, the Ld. Departmental Representative, submitted that the assessee has disclosed opening cash balance of ₹ 5,23,773/- by way of cash deposit in the assessee s bank account. The assessee .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d the addition. 10. On the contrary, Shri G. Baskar, the Ld.counsel for the assessee, submitted that there was an addition of ₹ 4,55,000/- towards unexplained cash deposit in bank account. The Ld.counsel further submitted that the CIT(Appeals) deleted the addition accepting the available funds to the extent of ₹ 5,23,773/- as on 31.03.2007. But, this fact needs to be verified. Further, the Ld.counsel submitted that the matter may be remitted back to the file of the Assessing Officer .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ct needs to be verified. Accordingly, the orders of the lower authorities are set aside and the issue of addition of ₹ 5,23,773/- is remitted back to the file of the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer shall re-examine the issue in the light of availability of funds as on 31.03.2007 and thereafter decide the matter in accordance with law after giving reasonable opportunity to the assessee. 12. The next ground of appeal is with regard to addition of ₹ 21,00,000/- towards unexplai .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y of Smt. Punitha Balakrishnan to repay the loan. Accordingly, made an addition of ₹ 21,00,000/-. On appeal by the assessee, the CIT(Appeals) found that the loan was given by the assessee to his wife by way of cheques. The CIT(Appeals) found that since the loan was advanced through banking channel, merely because the loan was not reflected in the balance sheet that cannot be a reason to disallow the claim of the assessee. According to the Ld. D.R., the fact that the loan said to be given t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version