Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Hiraco Jewellery (India) Pvt. Ltd. Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 8 (2) , Mumbai

Addition on account of upward adjustment by imputing Notional Interest on delayed debts - Held that:- It is uncontroverted stand of the assessee that he has not charged interest on delay in realization of debts in non AE situations as well. Once it is not in dispute, as is the case before us, that no interest is charged from the non AEs, i.e. independent transactions, as well, there cannot be any occasion to make an ALP adjustment, for notional interest, on delay in realization of trade debts fr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

here the economic substance of a transaction differs from its form and (ii) where the form and substance of the transaction are the same but arrangements made in relation to the transaction, viewed in their totality, differ from those which would have been adopted by independent enterprises behaving in a commercially rational manner.

None of these conditions is satisfied in the present case. The form and substance of the transactions are the same. The Transfer Pricing Officer has not .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tion, therefore, is not permissible. The very foundation of the Transfer Pricing Officer is thus wholly unsustainable in law. - Decided in favour of assessee - I.T.A. No.7297/Mum/2014 - Dated:- 31-3-2016 - Pramod Kumar AM and Pawan Singh JM For The Appellant : Bharath Janarthanan For The Respondent : Mallikarjun Utture ORDER Per Pramod Kumar, AM: 1. By way of this appeal, the assessee appellant has challenged correctness of the order dated 23.09.2014 passed by the learned CIT(A) in the matter of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

o follow the directions of Hon'ble DRP-II given in appellant's own case in respect of assessment year 2008-09; 1.2 On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) erred on facts in arriving a decision that the appellant itself has offered interest at the rate of 11.96% which has to be taken as basis while working out the amount of adjustment; 1.3 On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) erred by ignoring the case law in the case of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eld that right to receive interest and liability to pay interest arose in respect of the same period and out of the same event i.e. non payment of sale proceeds in time, it afforded sufficient nexus between two to justify applicability of principles of netting; 1.5 The Appellant submits that while giving directions to the AO to follow directions of Hon'ble DRO for this year wherein all objections have been considered, the CIT(A) has ignored the following vital facts as under :- a) that the a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

'AAA' instead of 'BBB'; e) that the payment of interest by the assessee to its AE on the contention that it would reduce the income which is prohibited by the Act; f) that the assessee company has both, purchase and sales, transactions with the AE and AE has not charged interest on delay in payments by assessee company; g) that the assessee company is entitled to nett off each and every transactions of sales and purchase with the AE (in accounting terminology) and if that has bee .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the open position and therefore receivables/debts found to be delayed which has invited the imputation of notional interest; i) that no such upward adjustment has been made in the assessment year 2007-08 (earlier year) and in the assessment year 2010-11 (subsequent year) despite the receivables were delayed and identical facts did existed in those years; 1.6 In view of the above grounds of appeal, the appellant submits that the CIT(A) be directed to delete the upward adjustment of ₹ 1,72,6 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

no such interest is charged from the non AEs was noted and brushed aside. It was also noted that in many cases the assessee has received advance payments from the AEs as well. He also noted that the business prudence or necessity of extending credit to the AE is not relevant for computing arm s length price in unrelated (sic- related) party transactions . It was also noted that lending or borrowing is not the man business of the company and that the assessee has extended the credit facility to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nd of the assessee that he has not charged interest on delay in realization of debts in non AE situations as well. Once it is not in dispute, as is the case before us, that no interest is charged from the non AEs, i.e. independent transactions, as well, there cannot be any occasion to make an ALP adjustment, for notional interest, on delay in realization of trade debts from the AEs. The very purpose of the arm s length price adjustments is to neutralize the impact of intra AE relationship on com .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

are the same but arrangements made in relation to the transaction, viewed in their totality, differ from those which would have been adopted by independent enterprises behaving in a commercially rational manner. None of these conditions is satisfied in the present case. The form and substance of the transactions are the same. The Transfer Pricing Officer has not brought on record any material to demonstrate and establish that the form and substance of transactions are different. It is not, and i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nt, by our order of even date in the case of Rusabh Diamonds Vs ACIT and vice versa (I.T.A. Nos. 2497 and 689/Mum/2010, Assessment year: 2009-10), we have held this issue, in general, in favour of the assessee, by observing as follows: 12. In our considered view, even if we proceed on the basis that Explanation to Section 92B is indeed retrospective in effect and it does cover delay in realization of debts, as long as sale is benchmarked on TNMM basis, as in this situation before us, there canno .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

her income , under pre amended as well as post amended schedule VI to the Companies Act, which is duly taken into account into computation of PBIT. In a way PBIT is a misnomer, as while PBIT does not take into account interest expenditure, it does take into account interest incomeappearing in the other income. Once the profitability, as per PBIT, is found to be comparable, there cannot be a separate adjustment for interest income on delayed realization which is an integral part of the PBIT figur .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

id amount of ₹ 2428.26 millions has also been determined/ computed by the assessee having regard to the arm's length price on application of Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM), on aggregation of transactions, as prescribed under section 92C of the Income Tax Act, 1961". In this backdrop, we can usefully refer to the decision of Hon'ble Delhi High Court, in the case of Sony Ericsson Mobile Corporation Pvt Ltd Vs ACIT [(2015) 374 ITR 118(Del)] wherein Their Lordships had, in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

determine or accept the transfer price and still segregate AMP expenses as an international transaction," 8. By way of an example, this aspect of the matter was then explained by Hon'ble Delhi High Court as follows: "An example given below would make it clear: Particulars Case 1 Case 2 Sales 1000 1,000 Purchase Price 600 500 Gross Margin 400 (40%) 500 Marketing Sale promotion 50 150 Overhead expense 300 300 Net profit 50 (5%) 50 (5%) The above illustrations draw a distinction betw .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

: Particulars Case 2 Sales 1,000 Purchase Price 500 Gross Margin 500 (50%) Overhead expenses 300 Marketing expenses 50 Net profit 150 (15%) It is obvious that this would not be the correct way and method to compute the arm's length price. The purchase price adjustments/set off would be mandated to arrive at the arm's length price, if the AMP expenses are segregated as an independent international transaction....." 9. By the same logic, even making an adjustment for interest on exces .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f debtors, being inextricably connected with the sales, is also part of operating income. In the case of Nirma Industries Limited Vs DCIT [(2006) 283 ITR 402 (Guj)], Hon'ble High Court has dealing with the nature of interest on debtors, held it to be integral to business income. The same is the principle for the transfer pricing cases to that extent interest is to be taken as integral to sale proceeds, and, as such, includible in operating income. When such an interest is includible in opera .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tment for delayed realization of debtors and on the facts of this case, is thus devoid of legally sustainable merits. 10. The other aspect of the matter is that a separate adjustment for delayed realization of debtors can, even in a fit case, can only be made only to the extent the credit period allowed to the associated enterprises is more than the credit period allowed to independent enterprise in respect of the same or materially similar transactions. In the present case, it is an undisputed .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hat the credit period allowed to the AEs is comparable with credit period of non AEs in respect of similar goods. To compare credit period in respect of finished goods with the credit period in respect of semi-finished goods, is, therefore, somewhat fallacious in approach and untenable in law. In our considered view, merely because there is a delay in realization of debts cannot be reason enough to make an addition as long as such a delay is peculiar to the transactions with AEs. The adjustment .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ion per se, but is a result of the international transaction as it only reflects that the related payment has not been made by the debtor. As for the learned Departmental Representative's stand that "the supplier is entitled to receipt of payment immediately on delivery irrespective of whether the finished goods is sold in the market, get spoiled in manufacturing or is damaged" would probably be valid in the perfect market conditions which are more of a myth than reality. The only .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f exceptions rather than rule, and more so in a complex case in which the assessee is sole vendor and the very existence of the buyer is to process the semi- finished goods and sell it to the end buyers. Many factors, such normal business practices and the commercial exigencies, influence the fact of payment in respect of a commercial transaction. Whether a payment is made immediately by the AE or is made after six months cannot, therefore, be seen in isolation with what is the position is with .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ns with non- AEs. The comparison has to be based on real transactions of similar nature, if at all such transactions have taken place. When no such transactions have taken place, as is the case before us, there is obviously no occasion of any comparison. The stand taken by the learned Departmental Representative, therefore, is not only quite detached from commercial reality but also wholly untenable in law. In any case, what can be examined on the touchstone of arm's length principles is the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

view of these discussions, and respectfully following the decision of the coordinate bench in assessee's own case for the earlier years, we uphold the grievance of the assessee and direct the Assessing Officer to delete the impugned ALP adjustment of ₹ 2,10,95,346. 14. As regards learned Departmental Representative s contention that Sony Ericsson Mobile Corporation decision (supra) will not apply in the case before us in the context of interest on delayed realization of debts for the s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e of other income which is duly included in the PBIT figure. It is only interest expenditure which is not taken into account in the PBIT computation. There is no warrant for the proposition that interest expenditure taken into account is net of interest income on account of delay in realization of debts. We, therefore, reject this contention of the Departmental Representative. 15. As for learned Departmental Representative s suggestion that it is to be verified whether the comparables include in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

te integral part of the transfer pricing documentation. There is nothing on record to show these exclusions. 16. As regards the contention that normally all interest incomes are excluded in the computation of PBIT as such incomes rarely constitute operational income, we see no need to be guided by such hypothesis and generalities. There is nothing on the records, as we have noted earlier, such exclusions on the facts of this case. In any event, setting off of interest expenditure with interest o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

also see no need to address ourselves to the specific factual arguments advanced by the learned counsel. In effect thus, we uphold the grievance of the assessee, and direct the Assessing Officer to delete the impugned arm s length price adjustment. 18. As we have upheld the grievance of the assessee, and thus deleted the impugned ALP adjustment, grievance raised by the Assessing Officer, which was in respect of the interest rate on the basis of which ALP adjustment was required to be made, is r .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ides as follows: Explanation*: - For the removal of doubts, it is hereby clarified that - (*inserted by the Finance Act 2012, though with retrospective effect from 1st April 2002) (i) the expression "international transaction" shall include - (a) the purchase, sale, transfer, lease or use of tangible property including building, transportation vehicle, machinery, equipment, tools, plant, furniture, commodity or any other article, product or thing; (b) the purchase, sale, transfer, leas .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

le of marketable securities or any type of advance, payments or deferred payment or receivable or any other debt arising during the course of business; (d) provision of services, including provision of market research, market development, marketing management, administration, technical service, repairs, design, consultation, agency, scientific research, legal or accounting service; (e) a transaction of business restructuring or reorganisation, entered into by an enterprise with an associated ent .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rtistic related intangible assets, such as, literary works and copyrights, musical compositions, copyrights, maps , engravings; (d) data processing related intangible assets, such as, proprietary computer software, software copyrights, automated databases, and integrated circuit masks and masters; (e) engineering related intangible assets, such as, industrial design , product patents, trade secrets, engineering drawing and schematics, blueprints, proprietary documentation; (f) customer related i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hts, water rights; (j) goodwill related intangible assets, such as, institutional goodwill, professional practice goodwill, personal goodwill of professional, celebrity goodwill, general business going concern value; (k) methods, programmes, systems, procedures, campaigns, surveys, studies, forecasts, estimates, customer lists, or technical data; (l) any other similar item that derives its value from its intellectual content rather than its physical attributes. . 21. Shortly before the 2012 amen .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

well. That is the only provisions under which ALP adjustments can be made. In other words, therefore, arm's length price adjustments can only be made in respect of an 'international transactions'. The expression 'international transaction', on the other hand, is defined under section 92 B as a transaction between two or more associated enterprises, either or both of them are non-residents, "in the nature of purchase, sale or lease of tangible or intangible property, or .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n per se, but is a result of the international transaction. In plain words, a continuing debit balance only reflects that the payment, even though due, has not been made by the debtor. It is not, however, necessary that a payment is to be made as soon as it becomes due. Many factors, including terms of payment and normal business practices, influence the fact of payment in respect of a commercial transaction. Unlike a loan or borrowing, it is not an independent transaction which can be viewed on .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

siduary clause in the definition of 'international transaction', i.e. any other transaction having a bearing on the profits, incomes, losses or assets of such enterprises, does not apply to a continuing debit balance, on the given facts of the case, for the elementary reason that there is nothing on record to show that as a result of not realizing the debts from associated enterprises, there has been any impact on profits, incomes, losses or assets of the assessee. In view of these discu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ted the learned Departmental Representative s contention that the above decision is no longer good in law since a coordinate bench of this Tribunal, in the case of i-Gate Computer Systems Ltd Vs ACIT and vice versa (ITA No. 2504/PN/2012 has, inter alia, stated that the Hon ble Bombay High Court, in assessee s own case relating to the assessment year 2002-03 in Income Tax Appeal No. 1148/2012, vide judgment dated 28.2.2013, has held that in view of the amendment by the Finance Act 2012 with retro .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ircumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal did not err in holding that the loss suffered by the assessee by allowing excess period of credit to the associated enterprises without charging any interest during such period would not amount to international transaction whereas Section 92B(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, refers to any other transaction having a bearing on the profits, income, losses or assets of such enterprise . Rather than answering this question on merits, and with the cons .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

h decision in light on the amendment. Accordingly, this issue is remitted to the file of the Tribunal for fresh decision on merits 25. The observations so made by Hon ble jurisdictional High Court, in our limited understanding, cannot be construed as holding that in view of the amendment by the Finance Act 2012 with retrospective effect from 1st April 2002, the said transaction of charging of interest from the AEs is covered under the amended provision of Section 92B(1) of the Act . As it appear .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s for this reason that the said decision of the Pune bench of the Tribunal, relied upon by the learned Departmental Representative, is per incurium and does not bind the coordinate benches. 28. The question then is as to what is the impact of amendment in section 92B, by the virtue of Finance Act 2012, on the definition of international transaction so far as the interest on delayed realization of debt is concerned. 29. The amendment so made by the Finance Act 2012, stated to be with retrospectiv .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

including by way of deferred payment or receivable or any other debt arising during the course of business will constitute an international transaction under section 92B. Going by this definition any debts arising during the course of business will constitute an international transaction. A trade debt is, accordingly, covered by this definition. However, since the assessment year that we are dealing with is prior to the assessment year 2012-13, the next important question is whether this amendme .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

significance in the light of a new judicial development that we will deal with in a short while now. In the present case, we are dealing with a situation in which the amendment was made with retrospective effect and it covered certain issues which were already subjected to a judicial interpretation in a particular manner. The judicial interpretation so given was certainly not the end of the road. The matter could have been carried in appeal before higher judicial forums. If the decision of a ju .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

icial ruling in taxation, it is the time for, at least on a theoretical note, introspection for the draftsman as to what went so wrong that fundamental intent of law of law could not be conveyed by the words of the statute, or, perhaps for the judicial forums, as to what went so wrong that the interpretation was so off the mark visà- vis fundamental principles of taxation or the sound policy considerations. However, amendment so made are generally prospective, and there is a sound concept .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n "lack of inquiry" and "inadequate inquiry". If there was any inquiry, even inadequate that would not by itself give occasion to the CIT to pass orders under s. 263 of the Act, merely because he has different opinion in the matter. It is only in cases of "lack of inquiry" that such a course of action would be open ], it was reiterated that it was only the lack, not the adequacy, of inquiry which could confer jurisdiction under section 263 on the Commissioner. By in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

thus contribute to greater certainty and congenial business climate. Nothing evidences it better than this subtle, but easily discernible, paradigm shift in the underlying approach to the amendments made in Section 263 in the very first full budget of the present Government. 32. What has, however, been done in the case before us is to amend the law with retrospective effect. Of course, it happened much before the current awareness about the evils of retrospective taxation having been translated .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lip;….. 36. A clarificatory amendment presumes the existence of a provision the language of which is obscure, ambiguous, may have made an obvious omission, or is capable of more than one meaning. In such case, a subsequent provision dealing with the same subject may throw light upon it. Yet, it is not every time that the legislature characterizes an amendment as retrospective that the Court will give such effect to it. This is not in derogation of the express words of the law in question, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hellip;……………. 37. An important question, which arises in this context, is whether a clarificatory amendment remains true to its nature when it purports to annul, or has the undeniable effect of annulling, an interpretation given by the courts to the term sought to be clarified. In other words, does the rule against clarificatory amendments laying down new principles of law extend to situations where law had been judicially interpreted and the legislature seeks .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y [223 F2d 668 (8th Cir 1955)]. It does not mean that the legislature does not have the power to override judicial decisions which in its opinion it deems as incorrect, however to respect the separation of legal powers and to avoid making a legislature a court of last resort, the amendments can be made prospective only [Ref County of Sacramento v State (134 Cal App 3d 428) and In re Marriage of Davies (105 I II App 3d 66)] (Emphasis, by underlining, supplied by us) 34. Quite clearly, in view of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he scope of a charging provision can be enlarged with retrospective effect, but an anti-avoidance measure, that the transfer pricing legislation inherently is, is not primarily a source of revenue as it mainly seeks compliant behaviour from the assessee vis-àvis certain norms, and these norms cannot be given effect from a date earlier than the date norms are being introduced . We may add that right now we are only concerned with the question of retrospective amendment in the transfer pric .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e purpose of such interpretive statute, or clarificatory amendment, is correct a judicial interpretation of prior law, which the legislature considers inaccurate, the effect is prospective and, as in this case, it deals with transfer pricing legislation which essentially seeks a degree of compliant behavior from the assessee vis-à-vis certain norms- the norms the assessee should know at the time of entering into the transactions rather than at the time of scrutiny of his affairs at a much .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

trigger the levy of taxes; it only tells you what behavior is acceptable or what is not acceptable. What triggers levy of taxes is non-compliance with the manner in which the anti-abuse regulations require the taxpayers to conduct their affairs. In that sense, all anti abuse legislations seek a certain degree of compliance with the norms set out therein. It is, therefore, only elementary that amendments in the anti-abuse legislations can only be prospective. It does not make sense that someone .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t only clarifies the law, it does not expand the law. 38. Well, if the 2012 amendment does not add anything or expand the scope of international transaction defined under section 92B, assuming that it indeed does not- as learned Departmental Representative contends, this provision has already been judicially interpreted, and the matter rests there unless it is reversed by a higher judicial forum. However, if the 2012 amendment does increase the scope of international transaction under section 92 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t possibly perform. The law itself and its administration is understood to disclaim as it does in its general aphorisms, all intention of compelling impossibilities, and the administration of law must adopt that general exception in the consideration of particular cases. [See : U.P.S.R.T.C. vs. Imtiaz Hussain 2006 (1) SCC 380, Shaikh Salim Haji Abdul Khayumsab vs. Kumar & Ors. 2006 (1) SCC 46, Mohammod Gazi vs. State of M.P. & Ors. 2000 (4) SCC 342 and Gursharan Singh vs. New Delhi Munic .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ns to the issuance of delayed realization of debtors being outside the scope of international transaction , cannot be said to be retrospective in effect. The fact that it is stated to be retrospective, in the light of the aforesaid guidance of Hon ble Delhi High Court, would not alter the situation, and it can only be treated as prospective in effect i.e. with effect from 1st April 2012 onwards. 40. As we deal with this question, it is also relevant to consider whether this Tribunal can, while a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the statute, in accordance with the law laid down by Hon ble Courts above and in the light of binding judicial precedents. When a binding judicial precedent requires us to deviate from the specific words of the provisions of the statute in a particular manner, we have to do so. There is no escape from this call of duty. Of course, whatever we do is, and shall always remain, subject to the approval by Hon ble Courts above. 41. There are a number of decisions in which our so tinkering with the spe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

guidance from Hon ble Delhi High Court, in view of legislative amendments made from time to time, which throw light on what was actually sought to be achieved by this legal provision, and in the light of the above analysis of the scheme of the law, we are of the considered view that section 40(a)(ia) cannot be seen as intended to be a penal provision to punish the lapses of non deduction of tax at source from payments for expenditure- particularly when the recipients have taken into account inco .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sions workable has to be treated as retrospective notwithstanding the fact that the amendment has been given effect prospectively . Revenue, thus, does not derive any advantage from special bench decision in the case Bharti Shipyard (supra). 9. On a conceptual note, primary justification for such a disallowance is that such a denial of deduction is to compensate for the loss of revenue by corresponding income not being taken into account in computation of taxable income in the hands of the recip .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

pse and punishing a lapse are two different things and have distinctly different, and sometimes mutually exclusive, connotations. When we appreciate the object of scheme of section 40(a)(ia), as on the statute, and to examine whether or not, on a fair, just and equitable interpretation of law- as is the guidance from Hon ble Delhi High Court on interpretation of this legal provision, in our humble understanding, it could not be an intended consequence to disallow the expenditure, due to non dedu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

atory deduction restriction for an income going untaxed due to tax withholding lapse. The penalty for tax withholding lapse per se is separately provided for in Section 271 C, and, section 40(a)(ia) does not add to the same. The provisions of Section 40(a)(ia), as they existed prior to insertion of second proviso thereto, went much beyond the obvious intentions of the lawmakers and created undue hardships even in cases in which the assessee s tax withholding lapses did not result in any loss to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rovision was introduced. In view of these discussions, as also for the detailed reasons set out earlier, we cannot subscribe to the view that it could have been an intended consequence to punish the assessee s for non deduction of tax at source by declining the deduction in respect of related payments, even when the corresponding income is duly brought to tax. That will be going much beyond the obvious intention of the section. Accordingly, we hold that the insertion of second proviso to Section .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

view that the above reasoning of the Agra Bench of ITAT as regards the rationale behind the insertion of the second proviso to Section 40(a) (ia) of the Act and its conclusion that the said proviso is declaratory and curative and has retrospective effect from 1st April 2005, merits acceptance. 15. In that view of the matter, the Court is unable to find any legal infirmity in the impugned order of the ITAT in adopting the ratio of the decision of the Agra Bench, ITAT in (Rajiv Kumar Agarwal v. AC .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version