Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2016 (3) TMI 1076 - ITAT COCHIN

2016 (3) TMI 1076 - ITAT COCHIN - TMI - Entitlement to depreciation - whether the production of readymix concrete amounts to manufacture and hence the assessee would be entitled for deprecation as claimed in respect of the machinery used? - Held that:- It is common knowledge that an uneducated mason does the work of preparation of readymix concrete for construction of houses and it is never treated as manufacturing activity either in the common parlance or in the commercial parlance. The readymi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rticle or thing.

Having regard to the ratio laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of N.C. Budharaja & Co [1993 (9) TMI 6 - SUPREME Court ], bearing in mind the fact that the end product should amount to manufacture or production of an article or thing, the readymix concrete manufactured by the assessee, which is also engaged in the construction activity, cannot be said to be a manufacturing activity.

Therefore, answer the question in the negative and in favour of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ident: On account of difference of opinion between the Ld. Judicial Member and the Ld. Accountant Member with regard to allowability of additional depreciation on the machinery used by the assessee, the following question was framed and forwarded to the Hon ble President u/s. 255(4) of the I.T. Act for nominating Third Member to decide the issue: Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, when the assessee is engaged itself in manufacture and sale of readymix concrete, whether the produ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mix concrete. The case of the Assessing Officer is that they are road transport vehicles and hence, not eligible for additional depreciation. The case of the assessee was that the transit mixer and other vehicles are suitably adopted to mount the mixer and intended for use for a specific purpose and they are defined as construction equipment vehicles under Central Motor Vehicle Rules; Hence they have to be considered as non transport vehicles . The Assessing Officer, however, was of the opinion .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ficer, the assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal. 4. The Ld. Judicial Member observed that the assessee is producing readymix concrete and transporting the same to the construction site to be used by the builders in the construction of buildings etc. An identical issue was considered by the ITAT, Delhi Bench in the case of YFC Projects (P) Ltd. vs. Dy. CIT (2010) 134 TTJ (Del) 167 wherein the Delhi Bench of the ITAT referred to the decision of the Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of N.C.Bu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

test to determine whether a particular activity amounts to manufacture is (a) whether new and different articles or goods emerge with distinctive name, use and character, (b) whether the transformation into a new commodity is commercially known as a distinct and separate commodity having its own character, use and name, (c) whether it is the result of a process or several processes. In the background of ratio laid down by various Courts, including the observations made by the Apex Court in the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssee from the point of an expert, who has laid down BIS standards, then it would indicate that it is a complicated affair. The mixing of four products in prescribed ratio would result in a different identifiable product which cannot be reconverted to its original shape. The Bench, therefore, observed that the activity carried out by the assessee is a manufacturing activity. 5. By placing reliance on the above findings of the ITAT, Delhi Bench, the Ld. Judicial Member observed that the machinery .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

manufacture of an article or thing, the Ld. Judicial Member chose to follow the decision of the ITAT, Delhi Bench in the case of YFC Projects (P) Ltd. (cited supra) to hold that the assessee is entitled for additional depreciation. 7. With regard to the question whether the transit mixer, Tata truck or Ashok Leyland truck are plant and machinery, the Ld. Judicial Member observed that specialized chamber is mounted on the transit mixer, Tata truck or Ashok Leyland truck for transporting readymix .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e are normally associated with movables - articles and goods, but they are never employed to denote the construction activity of the nature involved in the construction of a dam or for that matter a bridge, a road or a building. 9. The Ld. Accountant Member relied upon the decision of the Hon ble Delhi High Court in the case of Bhagat Construction Co. (P) Ltd. 232 ITR 722 wherein the assessee company derived income from construction work including mining work for extracting stones to be used in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

assessee in its building work. 10. Similarly, the Ld. Accountant Member relied on the decision of Hon ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT vs. Minocha Brothers (P) Ltd., 160 ITR 134 wherein the Court observed that the assessee-company while in the process of doing construction work, was engaged in crafting doors, windows, RCC slabs and so on which did not amount to manufacturing activity. 11. The ld. Accountant Member made an observation that the assessee having engaged in construction activi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

aim of additional depreciation on plant and machinery and tipper was rejected on the ground that the assessee was engaged in road construction contract and manufacture and production of concrete mix. Hence, the Ld. Accountant Member held that the assessee is not entitled to the claim of additional depreciation u/s. 32(1)(iia) on Transmit Mixer, Tata Trucks and Ashok Leyland Trucks. 13. The main issue that arises for my consideration is whether preparation of ready mix concrete amounts to manufac .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the ITAT, Delhi Bench in the case of YFC Projects (P) Ltd. to submit that production of readymix concrete involves a scientific process and hence it amounts to manufacture or production of article or thing. He further submitted that in the instant case, the assessee not only used it for captive consumption but also supplied readymix concrete to others. However, the assessment order passed by the Assessing officer, CIT(A) and the orders passed by the ITAT do not indicate as to whether the assesse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sidered as manufacturing activity and therefore, the Transit Mixer, Tata truck and Ashok Leyland Truck on which mixer is mounted should be treated as plant and machinery utilised for manufacture and hence, they should not be considered as road transport vehicles in which event the assessee would be entitled to additional depreciation. When the assessee was specifically asked to point out what is the specialized scientific process involved for production of ready mix concrete, the Ld. Counsel sub .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t is known as RMC which is distinct from the raw material. The Bench also observed that the raw material once mixed cannot be reconverted into its original shape and also stated that the expression manufacture has to be understood in the common parlance and any change in the article which results in a new and different article would amount to manufacturing activity. RMC of different categories under different grades are made according to the requirement of the buyer and when it is mixed with wat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

igh Court to the file of the Tribunal to ascertain whether RMC was sold to outside parties or not. When the Ld. Counsel submitted that common parlance test has to be applied to understand the expression manufacture , the Bench pointed out that under the common parlance, readymix concrete is ordinarily prepared by a mason who is not a qualified engineer and it is never treated as manufacturing activity; Similarly, the Hon ble Kerala High Court, in the case of CIT vs. Casino (Pvt) Ltd. 91 ITR 289, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

re as to under which section the judgment was rendered. Unless the assessee places before the Bench the phraseology used in the section which was the subject matter of consideration and compares with the section which is under consideration before us, it is not possible to take into consideration any case law under different enactments. When it was pointed out to the Ld. A/R, he did not go into the said case law. However, he referred to the decision of the Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of In .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

(Patna) ( 258 ITR 448) (Mad.) and (281 ITR 297) (Guj.). 16. It deserves to be noticed that the point of difference which was referred to for my consideration is limited i.e., whether the preparation of ready mix concrete amounts to manufacture or production of article or thing . Hence the case law, as to whether the mobile crane is a road transport vehicle or not, is not the subject matter in dispute and hence, it is not necessary to go into that aspect. Thus the case law which is relevant in th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

The word production: or produce when used in juxtaposition with the word manufacture , takes in bringing into existence new goods by a process which may or may not amount to manufacture. It also takes in all the by-products, intermediate products and residual products which emerge in the course of manufacture of goods. The Court approved the observations of the earlier decision of the Apex Court in the case of NC. Budharaja & Co. (cited supra). 17. In the case of N.C. Budharaja & Co., t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

; Co. (cited supra). 18. The Ld. DR submitted that the Hon ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT vs,. Minocha Brothers (P) Ltd., 160 ITR 134 observed that manufacture of doors, windows for a building is not qualified as manufacture of article or thing because the real activity of the assessee was to construct buildings which are not goods. Here also, the RMC is used for the purpose of construction of buildings, dams, roads, canals etc. and since the end product would not be classified as a new .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n the business of construction and repair of buildings (CIT vs. NUC (P) Ltd, 126 ITR 377). He further submitted that the decision in the case of YFC Projects Pvt. Ltd. (cited supra) was rendered on 24.9.2007 and the same was set aside by the Hon ble Delhi High Court and thus, a fresh order came to be passed in 2015 by the ITAT whereas the ITAT, Delhi A Bench, in the case of BSC & CIV vs. ACIT (I.T.A. Nos. 1217/Del/2011 and 1752/Del/2011 dated 15-05-2012), considered the same issue exhaustive .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ee s end product does not amount to production of new article or thing, benefit cannot be extended to any intermediatary product. In other words, when the construction of building, etc. would not amount to manufacture, the intermediate product also cannot be treated as manufacturing activity. 19. The Ld. Departmental Representative submitted that the onus is upon the assessee to prove as to whether if any scientific process is involved in preparing readymix concrete; He contended that it can als .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mber. 20. I have heard the rival submissions and perused the record. It is common knowledge that an uneducated mason does the work of preparation of readymix concrete for construction of houses and it is never treated as manufacturing activity either in the common parlance or in the commercial parlance. The readymix concrete can be produced in huge volume with the help of machines with less manpower but merely because there is increase in volume, it cannot automatically be treated as manufacturi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version