GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (7) TMI 1090 - ITAT KOLKATA

2015 (7) TMI 1090 - ITAT KOLKATA - TMI - Levy of penalty u/s. 271D - Held that:- The assessee admitted the fact that the assessee had received a sum of ₹ 20,000/- from each of eleven creditors totaling to ₹ 2,20,000/- in cash. The reasonable cause for receipt of this cash loan was that the assessee received cash loan from relatives, who are neither income tax assessee nor having any bank account. Hence, he has no other alternative except to receive loans in cash for an amount of S .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Decided in favour of assessee - I.T.A No.1911/Kol/2012 - Dated:- 8-7-2015 - SHRI P. K. BANSAL, AM & SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JM For the Appellant: Shri Sunil Surana, FCA For the Respondent: Shri Pijush Mukherjee, JCIT-SR-DR ORDER PER SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JM: This appeal by assessee is arising out order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-XXXVI, Kolkata in appeal No.684/CIT(A)-XXXVI/Kol/2009-10/1695 dated 03.12.2012. Assessment was framed by ITO, Wd-4, Krishnagar, Nadia u/s. 143(3) of the Incom .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

travention to provisions of section 269SS of the Act. Briefly stated facts of the case are that Assessing Officer observed during the assessment proceeding that the assessee had accepted loans totaling to ₹ 2,20,000/- in cash from eleven persons for an amount of ₹ 20,000/- in each case. While imposing penalty the JCIT held that the assessee did not deny receiving loans in cash in contravention of the provisions of section 269SS of the Act. Hence, he imposed the penalty u/s. 271D of t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

eceived cash loan from relatives, who are neither income tax assessee nor having any bank account. Hence, he has no other alternative except to receive loans in cash for an amount of ₹ 20,000/- from each of them. These facts are undisputed but before us Ld. Counsel for the assessee relied on CBDT Circular No.572 dated 03.08.1990 reported in (1999) 87 CTR (St.) 1, and stated that this circular has clearly brought out the provision of section 269SS explaining that for taking or accepting any .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

and other consequently would be bound by that circular. In the instant case, CBDT for the purpose of attracting s. 271D has set out that the loan or deposit should be in excess of ₹ 20000/- is true that what CBDT has stated may be contrary to the expressed language of s. 269SS which uses the expression twenty thousand rupees or more . The law and the CBDT circulars can be spelled out from the following judgments of the Supreme Court. In Nãvnit Lal. C. Javeri Vs. K.K. Sen. AAC (1965 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

g on the Revenue and this binding character attaches to the circulars even if they be found not in accordance with the correct interpretation of the section and they depart or deviate from such construction, when they are issued in exercise of the statutory powers under s. 119. It was however clarified that the Board cannot pre-empt a judicial interpretation of the scope and ambit of the provision and further could not impose a burden on the taxpayer higher than what the Act itself, on a true in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version