Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Surovi Mansion Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Income Tax Officer

2016 (5) TMI 481 - ITAT KOLKATA

Disallowance u/s 40A(3) - cash payments exceeding the sum of ₹ 20,000 - Held that:- None of the case the payment is exceeding ₹ 20,000 for the purchase of old ornaments. In all the cases where the addition was made by the AO on account of deemed payment of ₹ 20,000 on the purchase of old ornaments, the assessee sold ornaments in exchange thereof. As a result, the net payment was made the party for the purchase of old ornaments. However the assessee in its books of accounts was .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

exceeding ₹ 20,000. However we find that wherever the payment exceeds for purchase more than ₹ 20,000, it has been made through account payee cheque only as evident from the submission of the assessee. In view of the above, we conclude that the assessee has not violated provisions of section 40A(3) of the Act on account of payment exceeding for the purchase of old ornaments exceeding ₹ 20,000 - Decided in favour of assessee

Disallowance u/section 40(a)(ia) - melting .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ned the loss of gold incurred during the course of melting and manufacturing process to the tune of 906.880 grams. Such a loss was not doubted by the AO at the time of assessment but the addition for the loss of gold 166.170 grams was made due to non-availability of reconciliation. In our view merely assessee failed to provide the reconciliation does not mean that the payment has been made in the form of gold. The AO should have brought cogent reasons for treating the loss of gold as payment to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sessee failed to reconcile the gold received from the customers to the tune of 30.100 grams therefore the same was treated as income. However from the submission of the assessee we find that the liability towards the deposit of gold from the customers was very much reflecting in the books of the assessee for the relevant year and no such liability was written back in the year. Now it is really clear that a trading liability can be taxed only if it is written off in the books of accounts. In the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ted:- 13-4-2016 - Shri N. V. Vasusdevan, Judicial Member And Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Member For the Petitioner : Shri A. K. Tibrawal, FCA For the Respondent : Shri Pinaki Mukherjee, JCIT-DR ORDER Per Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Member This appeal by the assessee is arising out of order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-XII, Kolkata dated 22.03.2013. Assessment was framed by ITO Ward-12(1), Kolkata u/s 115WE(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) vide his or .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

20,000 on any date whatsoever. 3. Brief facts as culled out from the record are that assessee is a Private Limited Company and engaged in the business of manufacturing and retailing of gold & silver ornaments and precious and semi precious stones. The assessee filed its return of income on 30-09-2009 declaring total income of ₹ 2,13,930/- under the head business & profession . However, AO framed u/s 143(3) of the Act by assessing the income of assessee at ₹ 34,40,850/-. It wa .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of ornaments in the cash book. However, in the actuality the transaction will only be settled with the customer at the amount of the difference arising between purchase and sale value of ornaments. The AO on examining the cash book found that payment for old gold purchase account exceeds ₹ 20,000/- and as such it violates the provisions of section 40A(3) of the Act. The plea of the assessee that the transaction of purchase and sale of the ornaments should be verified in the context of net .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the total income of the assessee. 4. Aggrieved, assessee preferred an appeal to learned CIT(A) who confirmed the action of AO by observing that the additions was made for the violation of section 40A(3) of the Act on account of the payment for purchase of old ornaments exceeding ₹ 20,000/-. Accordingly the plea of assessee was rejected that the aforesaid disallowance relates to the transactions of purchase of old ornaments in exchange of new ornaments and transaction of purchase of old or .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

amount adjusted with the parties. In none of the case the net payment was exceeding for the purchase of the old ornaments beyond ₹ 20,000/-. Although the assessee on sale of new ornaments in exchange of old ornaments was reflecting the transaction as independent purchase and sale in the books of accounts but in actuality the party account was adjusted with the net amount. For example, Mr. S. Bhattacharjee sold old gold to the assessee and the assessee issued the purchase memo which is pla .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nce amount of ₹ 165.00 (sale price ₹ 20,725/- purchase price ₹ 20,890/-) was paid to the aforesaid party. However, in the cash book both purchase & sale were recorded at the full value. The assessee also submitted that wherever the payment exceeds ₹ 20,000 then the payment was made by way of account payee cheque only. Besides the above, assessee further submitted that the above process of payments are permitted in terms of clause (d) of rule 6DD of Income Tax Rules. O .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

urchase of old ornaments. In all the cases where the addition was made by the AO on account of deemed payment of ₹ 20,000 on the purchase of old ornaments, the assessee sold ornaments in exchange thereof. As a result, the net payment was made the party for the purchase of old ornaments. However the assessee in its books of accounts was showing purchase and sale in full value and the same was also recorded as payment for the purchase and receipt for the sale in the cash book. In our conside .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

heque only as evident from the submission of the assessee which is placed on page number 1 and 2 of the paper book. The Ld DR also failed to bring anything corroborative evidence on record to controvert the arguments of the ld. AR. In addition to the above, we also find that an exception in clause (d) to Rule 6DD of Income Tax Rules 1962 has been provided which reads as under:- (d) where the payment is made by way of adjustment against the amount of any liability incurred by the payee for any go .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

m of ₹ 2,53,243/- under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act considering the melting loss incurred by KARIGARS is nothing but payment made to KARIGARS without deducting TDS. For this, assessee has raised effective ground as under:- 2) That the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in confirming the disallowance of ₹ 2,53,243 made arbitrarily by the Assessing Officer under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on the alleged ground that the melting loss incurred by kariga .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cturing process which is bound to happen and the same loss is also recognized in Foreign Trade Policy to the extent of 3.5% as wastage. Accordingly, the assessee submitted the working of such loss of 906.880 grams with reconciliation but failed to reconcile such loss to the extent of 166.170 grams. Accordingly the AO opined that the loss on making of ornaments to the extent of 166.170 grams represents the payments to KARIGARS in the form of gold as it is excess gold left with them in lieu of mak .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

policy as melting and manufacturing loss. The loss more than 3.5% was disallowed due to non-availability of reconciliation statement. Being aggrieved by this order of Ld CIT(A) assessee is in second appeal before us. 9. We have heard rival contentions and perused the materials available on record. Before us Ld. AR submitted that as per the understanding with the KARIGARS if the loss in the course of melting and manufacturing of gold is beyond the specified agreed percentage then the value of su .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ufacturing process. Such a loss was treated by the AO as payment to the KARIGARS in the form of gold without TDS. However the learned AR submitted this loss does not represent the payment to the KARIGARS in the form of gold but it is actual loss and the deduction for such access loss was also made from the payment of the KARIGARS. Now the question before us is whether such loss represents the payment to the KARIGARS or it is actual loss. In our considered view that there is undoubtedly loss occu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ot doubted by the AO at the time of assessment but the addition for the loss of gold 166.170 grams was made due to non-availability of reconciliation. In our view merely assessee failed to provide the reconciliation does not mean that the payment has been made in the form of gold. The AO should have brought cogent reasons for treating the loss of gold as payment to the KARIGARS. As we find that the loss of 906.880 grams was duly explained which shows that there was the system of making the payme .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lying with the assessee. For this, assessee has raised effective ground as under:-. 3) That the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in confirming the addition of ₹ 45,872 made by the Assessing Officer on the alleged ground that the assessee could not reconcile and file evidences in respect of gold deposits lying with the assessee. 12. The assessee has shown gold deposits from customers for 2173.07 grams. Some of the gold items were lying with the assessee for more than 3 yea .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t relate to the year under appeal and it has not been written off in the books of accounts. Therefore the provisions of section 41(1) of the Act will not be applied in the instant case. The learned CIT(A) disregarded the claim of the assessee and confirmed the action of AO by observing as under:- 7. Appeal on ground no. 4 is against the addition of ₹ 45872/- on account of gold deposits to customers. During the assessment proceedings while examining the closing stock the AO found gold depos .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version