TMI Blog2016 (5) TMI 513X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ential order dated 04.04.2016 and it could be seen that the petitioner did not pay the amount in spite of repeated reminders sent by the respondents. - Writ petition dismissed - Decided against the assessee. - W. P. No. 14319 of 2016 & W. M. P. No. 12505 of 2016 - - - Dated:- 15-4-2016 - M. Duraiswamy, J. For the Petitioner : Mr. M. D. Thirunavukkarasu For the Respondents : Mr. T. Cha ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ment of Service Tax, which was also paid by the petitioner. In the meanwhile, the respondents demanded, a sum of ₹ 14,87,115/- stating that the petitioner had collected for the service rendered by him for the period March 2005 to September 2005 and he had not paid Service Tax and Educational Cess of ₹ 1,48,712/- and ₹ 2,974/-. The petitioner is now challenging the consequential o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tly contended by the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents, without challenging the original order dated 28.02.2007, the petitioner cannot challenge the consequential order dated 04.04.2016 and it could be seen that the petitioner did not pay the amount in spite of repeated reminders sent by the respondents. 7. In these circumstances, I do not find any merits in the Writ Petition, which ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
