Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. IDMC Limited Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Anand Circle, Anand

Disallowance of additional depreciation on plant and machinery - Held that:- The assessee has acquired the plant and machineries before 31.03.2005 but the machineries were installed after 31.03.2005. If the revenue authorities’ view is accepted then the assessee cannot claim additional depreciation as per earlier provision since the machineries were neither acquired nor installed after 31.03.2002. At the same time, the assessee cannot claim the additional depreciation under the new provisions as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t of “ownership” of the asset. There remains no doubt that the assessee is very much entitled for the claim of additional depreciation. - Decided in favour of assessee. - ITA. No: 143/AHD/2013 - Dated:- 5-4-2016 - SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER For The Appellant : Shri Sanjay R. Shah, AR For The Respondent : Shri Narendra Singh, Sr. D.R. PER N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: 1. This appeal by the assessee is preferred against the order of Ld. CIT(A)- .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. counsel for the assessee stated that he is not pressing the ground relating to the challenge of the re-opening of the assessment. Hence, the same is dismissed as not pressed. 4. Coming to the merits of the case, during the course of the assessment proceedings and on verification of the case records, the A.O found that the assessee had claimed depreciation of ₹ 2,18,50,976/- which was @ 20% u/s. 32(1)(iia) of the Act. On further probe, the A.O found that the machinery was purchased before .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tled for additional depreciation. 5. Assessee was asked to justify its claim of additional depreciation. In its reply, the assessee stated that the machineries received were damaged and, therefore, had to be returned/replaced by the vendor which took sometime and, therefore, the installation took place after 31.03.2005. It was strongly contended that the claim of additional depreciation cannot be denied. 6. However, the claim of the assessee did not find favour with the A.O who was of the opinio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ciation is a benefit conferred upon the assessee by the statute, it deserves liberal construction and the benefits cannot be denied on technical reasons. 9. Per contra, the ld. D.R. strongly supported the findings of the revenue authorities. It is the say of the ld. D.R. that the A.O has rightly denied the claim since the assessee has not fulfilled the mandatory conditions for the claim of additional depreciation. 10. We have heard the rival submissions and carefully perused the orders of the au .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nder:- INCENTIVES FOR INVESTMENT AND INDUSTRIAL GROWTH Additional depreciation on new machinery and plant Under the existing provisions contained in sub-section (1) of section 32 of the Income-tax Act, deduction is allowed in respect of depreciation on assets owned wholly or partly by the assessee and used for the purposes of the business or profession at the rates prescribed under the Income-tax Rules, 1962. With a view to give a boost to the manufacturing sector, it is proposed to allow a dedu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

her sum shall be deductible from the written down value of the asset. "Installed capacity" has been defined to mean the capacity of production as existing on the last day of any previous year commencing on or after the 31st March, 2002. The proposed amendment will take effect from 1st April, 2003 and will, accordingly, apply in relation to the assessment year 2003- 2004 and subsequent years. 11. A perusal of the aforementioned object clearly shows that the legislature wanted to give a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t Day of March, 2002 by an assessee engaged in the business of manufacture or production of any article or thing, is allowed as deduction as further depreciation. It is proposed to increase the said sum of further depreciation mentioned in the said clause (iia) from fifteen per cent to twenty percent. It is further proposed to omit the conditions relating to industrial undertaking being new or substantial expansion mentioned in the first proviso to the aforesaid clause (iia) and also to omit the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ls of machinery and plant and report of an Accountant were done away with. Meaning thereby, that these conditions were not necessary for the claim of additional depreciation. 14. Once again, it can be seen that the amendments brought to this section is to encourage new investment in plant and machinery. 15. Coming back to the facts of the present case, as mentioned elsewhere, the assessee has acquired the plant and machineries before 31.03.2005 but the machineries were installed after 31.03.2005 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

making investments in new plant and machineries, the assessee is deprived of additional depreciation. 16. Let us look at the facts from another angle. The revenue has allowed the claim of depreciation admitting that the plant and machineries have been used by the assessee for its business only the claim of additional depreciation has been denied. In our considered opinion and the understanding of the law, the eligibility for the claim of depreciation should be considered from the date of the in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ad over more than a year, the relevant year for the grant of allowance would be the year in which the installation is completed. As in the case of investment allowance, so also in the case of additional depreciation, the material date is the date of installation and not the year of acquisition. The Tribunal categorically found on a perusal of the assessment order for the asst. yrs. 1980-81 and 1981-82 and the relevant balance sheets of the assessee-company that the machines in question were show .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tion and the installation was completed during the year under reference ; and secondly, no depreciation was ever claimed by the assessee prior to this assessment year on these machines. This finding of the Tribunal has not been challenged. The Tribunal also found that the machines, although acquired earlier, could not be installed in view of the change of management twice. The machines were lying idle and were kept for installation and the installation was completed in the year under reference. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

osses another financial year because of the humongous task of installing such machineries. In such a situation, can the assessee be denied the claim of additional depreciation merely because the acquisition and installation have taken place in two different financial years? In our considered opinion, the sine qua non for the claim of depreciation should be the date of installation when it can be said that the plant and machineries are ready for use. Acquisition can at best be related to the owne .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities – Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version