Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Micro Dynamics Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise

2016 (5) TMI 563 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Validity of Tribunal's order remanding the matter back for re-adjudication - CENVAT credit on common inputs and input services - Appellant contended that the Tribunal was in complete error in remanding the matter and the submission that the Commissioner has become functus officio is based on a communication, copy of which has been placed on file. Held that:- We do not think that the Tribunal has concluded the arguments raised before us of the Commissioner being functus officio in the light of th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e same. - Decided against the appellant - CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 25 OF 2016 - Dated:- 7-3-2016 - S.C. DHARMADHIKARI AND A.A. SAYED, JJ. For The Appellant : Mr. Makarand Joshi i/b M/s. Max Legal For The Respondent : Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly with Mr. Jitendra B. Mishra P.C. : 1. This appeal challenges the order passed by the Tribunal which is of remand. By the impugned order dated 19th March, 2015, the Tribunal set aside both the orders-in-original dated 22nd September, 2006 and the order in appeal .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

boilers. Amongst other type of boilers, they are also manufacturing Agro waste fired boilers. These Agro waste fired boilers are exempt from payment of central excise duty under Notification No.6 of 2002 of the Central Excise dated 1st March, 2006 in terms of Sr. No. 237 of the table to the Notification read with Item No.16 of List 9. It is the case of the appellants that they are regularly complying with the law. They are registered with the department but during an audit conducted in July, 200 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sed confirming the show cause notices and the demand therein. That order-in-original dated 22nd September, 2006, was challenged before the Tribunal, but the Tribunal and from what appears at page 5 of the paper-book did not assist the assessee in any manner. Thereafter, the personal hearing was held in terms of the show cause notice and the reply and an order was passed on 26th November, 2007, with regard to a show-cause notice dated 5th April, 2007. The earlier order was pertaining to show-caus .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

made to section 73 of the Finance Act , 2010 and in pursuance thereof, the proportionate credit was claimed to be reversed as envisaged in the said section. A letter was filed to that effect on 4th November, 2010, with the Commissioner, Pune-I, which was received on 8th November, 2010. However, no communication has been received from the Commissioner and it is, therefore, presumed that the reversal made is as per law and nothing survives thereafter. 6. The Tribunal found that the law relating to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssessee has satisfied the conditions of the provisions or not. It is in order to ascertain this position that the Tribunal allowed the appeal, set aside the orders and remanded the matter back to the Commissioner for a decision on the issue and on taking into consideration the assessee's letter dated 4th November, 2010. 7. After carefully perusing the order of the Tribunal in its entirety, we are unable to agree with the learned counsel that the Tribunal was in complete error in remanding th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tion 73 for acceptance / rejection. The letter is only an intimation of the reversal of CENVAT credit in terms of clause / section 73 of the Finance Act of 2010 as it retrospectively amends Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2003. He has given an explanation why the assessee's letter was not processed by the department. 9. We have seen a copy of that letter which is at page 74 of the paper-book. That letter of 4th November, 2010, to the Commissioner, Central Excise and Customs, Pune-I Commis .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

quot;We are submitting herewith our application along with the following documents for your kind approval certifying the amount of input credit attributable to the inputs used in or in relation to the manufacture of exempted goods. 1. Copies of Statements showing month-wise clearance of dutiable and exempted goods. 2. Copy of relevant pages of CENVAT Register, TR6 Challans and relevant pages of PLA Register evidencing payment / reversal of CENVAT as aforementioned. 3. Chartered Accountant's .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

te that the request of assessee was to consider this letter dated 4th November, 2010, as an application. The further request was to treat the matter as closed as the assessee claimed to have paid an amount equal to the CENVAT credit attributable to input services used in the manufacture of exempted goods after the clearance of the goods along with interest. Surprisingly the bracketed portion of this sentence states "subject to your approval for adjustment of interest liability from the exce .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version