Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

DCIT, Circle-8, Pune Versus Eagle Flask Industries Ltd.

Sundry balances written off - AO disallowed the same on the ground that assessee could not establish the genuineness of the amount written off - CIT(A) allowed the claim relying on the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of TRF Ltd.[2010 (2) TMI 211 - SUPREME COURT ] - Held that:- Held that:- No infirmity in the order of the CIT(A). We find before CIT(A) the assessee had submitted that the amounts were taken into account while computing the profit of earlier year. In the assessment ord .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the preceding assessment order. Since the assessee in the profit and loss account has written off the amount, therefore, in view of the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of TRF Ltd. (Supra) assessee is not required to establish that the debt has become irrecoverable. Therefore, the Ld.CIT(A) is justified in deleting the disallowance. - Decided against revenue - ITA No.896/PN/2014 - Dated:- 7-4-2016 - SHRI R.K. PANDA, AM AND SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JM For The Appellant : Shri M.K. Kulkarn .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld.CIT(A) was justified in allowing the sundry balances written off, when the assessee has not established that the debts written off were offered to tax in earlier years. 3. The appellant craves leave to add, amend or alter any of the above grounds of appeal. 3. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee company is engaged in the business of manufacturing glass refills, vacuum flasks and insulated wares. The assess .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sessee vide letter dated 06-12-2006 submitted the details of sundry balances written off/return back. When asked by the AO to prove the same the assessee only submitted narration of expenses claimed without any documentary evidence. Since the assessee could not establish the genuineness of the amount written off, the AO disallowed the entire amount of ₹ 3,74,58,951/-. 4. Before CIT(A) the assessee submitted that the said amounts were undisputedly taken into account while computing profit o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the assessee, deleted the disallowance made by the AO. 6. Aggrieved with such order of the CIT(A) the revenue is in appeal before us. 7. The Ld. Departmental Representative while supporting the order of the AO submitted that the order of the CIT(A) is erroneous because the assessee has not brought anything on record to prove that the amounts written off were taken into account for computing the profit of earlier years. The assessee has not given any documentary evidence with respect to the effo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

bad. But at the time same, the assessee cannot convert any live amount into a bad debt only on the basis of the technical rule of writing off. 7.2 Referring to the decision of the Hon ble Madras High Court in the case of South India Surgical Company Ltd. Vs. ACIT reported in 287 ITR 62 he submitted that the Hon ble High Court in the said decision has held that for claiming bad debt as an allowable deduction the assessee has to prove that those debtors were not in a position financially to pay th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed that the assessee company has stopped the manufacturing activities since October 2003 due to heavy accumulated losses. Referring to the decision of Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of TRF Ltd. (Supra) he submitted that the Hon ble Supreme Court in the said decision has held that after 01-04-1989 it is not necessary for the assessee to establish that the debt infact has become irrecoverable. It is enough if the bad debt is written off as irrecoverable in the accounts of the assessee. Since th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

td. (Supra). So far as the decision of the Bangalore Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Embassy Classic Pvt. Ltd.(Supra) is concerned the Ld. Counsel for the assessee drew the attention of the Bench to Para 17 of the order which reads as under: 17. Even though writing off a debt as bad and doubtful may be a sufficient mode of discharging the proof, the said format of statutory evidence is not an empty formality. It is not necessary for the assessee to prove that the debt has become bad. But at .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

after on 29.10.2005. Therefore, it is very clear that when the return of income was filed by the assessee, no debt was recoverable from the buyers of the property. We find a lot of force in the argument of the learned Commissioner of Income-tax regarding the non-committal of the assessee company in pursuing the legal remedies available before it for the recovery of the amount. Therefore, in these circumstances, we do not find that the debt has become bad debt. It was only a case of delayed payme .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e assessee had received back the amounts prior to filing of the return. Under these circumstances the Tribunal had held that the bad debt claimed by the assessee is not allowable since it is not a bad debt but a case of delayed payment. However, in the instant case, the assessee has not received any amount even till today. Therefore, the order of the CIT(A) being in accordance with law should be upheld. 11. We have considered the rival arguments made by both the sides, perused the orders of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

preme Court in the case of TRF Ltd. (Supra). We do not find any infirmity in the order of the CIT(A). We find before CIT(A) the assessee had submitted that the amounts were taken into account while computing the profit of earlier year. In the assessment order although the AO has asked the assessee to prove the genuineness of the claim of bad debt, he has never put any question regarding taking of the amounts written off as bad debt as income of earlier years. Therefore, the grounds raised by the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities – Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version